Background With the change of modern lifestyle and the aggravation of social aging, the incidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is increasing year by year, which has become a major problem threatening the health of middle-aged and elderly men. At present, western medicine is mainly based on surgery and oral drugs treatment, which has certain adverse reactions and complications. However, the clinical application of filiform acupuncture in the treatment of BPH has a significant effect, but there is a lack of evidence-based evidence.
Objective To systematically review the clinical efficacy of acupuncture therapy in treating BPH.
Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupuncture for BPH were retrieved from CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, SinoMed, PubMed and Cochrane Library by computer from inception to October1, 2021, including the experimental group treated by acupuncture, with or without the drugs used in the control group and the control group treated by conventional western medicine. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature was extracted and evaluated by using RevMan 5.3 software.
Results A total of 17 articles and 1 547 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that the clinical effective rate and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group〔OR=3.21, 95%CI (2.25, 4.57) , P<0.000 01; MD=2.48, 95%CI (1.26, 3.70) , P<0.000 1〕. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS) , residual urine volume (PVR) , prostate volume (PV) , and quality of life (QOL) score in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group〔MD=-2.39, 95%CI (-3.84, -0.94) , P=0.001; MD=-10.59, 95%CI (-15.20, -5.98) , P<0.000 01; MD=-3.50, 95%CI (-5.07, -1.93) , P<0.000 1; MD=-0.68, 95%CI (-0.99, -0.37) , P<0.000 1〕. The clinical effective rate and Qmax of acupuncture alone in treating BPH were higher than those of western medicine〔OR=3.53, 95%CI (2.20, 5.68) , P<0.000 01; MD=2.75, 95%CI (1.62, 3.88) , P<0.000 01〕. The PVR, PV and QOL of acupuncture alone in treating BPH were lower than those of western medicine〔MD=-9.41, 95%CI (-15.87, -2.94) , P=0.004; MD=-2.99, 95%CI (-4.86, -1.12) , P=0.002; MD=-0.74, 95%CI (-1.33, -0.15) , P=0.01〕. The clinical effective rate of acupuncture+western medicine for BPH was higher than that of western medicine〔OR=2.84, 95%CI (1.67, 4.82) , P=0.000 1〕; IPSS, PVR, PV and QOL of acupuncture+western medicine for BPH were lower than that of western medicine〔MD=-2.88, 95%CI (-3.43, -2.32) , P<0.000 01; MD=-12.25, 95%CI (-16.92, -7.57) , P<0.000 01; MD=-4.41, 95%CI (-8.03, -0.79) , P=0.02; MD=-0.59, 95%CI (-1.03, -0.15) , P=0.008〕. There were no obvious adverse reactions in both groups. The sensitivity analysis of IPSS, Qmax, PVR, PV and QOL results showed that the change effect model had no significant effect on the combined results. Funnel plot analysis was performed on RCTs of clinical response rate, IPSS, Qmax, PVR, and QOL, and the results showed that the funnel diagram of clinical response rate was basically symmetrical on both sides. The funnel plots of IPSS, Qmax, PVR, and QOL were scattered, and there was publication bias.
Conclusion Based on the current clinical evidence, the clinical efficacy and Qmax of acupuncture therapy for BPH were higher than those of the control group, and the IPSS, PVR, PV, and QOL were lower than those of the control group. Since funnel plots of IPSS, Qmax, PVR and QOL are scattered and have publication bias, the results of this study need further verification.