Background Demoralization syndrome is a kind of psychological pain caused by a series of negative life events. It is a new psychiatric diagnosis, and closely related to suicidal ideation. It has a high incidence in cancer patients, but relevant effective evaluation may be an early warning indicator for intervention. However, there is a lack of assessment tools for demoralization syndrome in China.
Objective To develop a Chinese version of the Demoralization Scale- Ⅱ (DS- Ⅱ) and test its reliability and validity.
Methods From August 2019 to January 2020, 410 cancer inpatients from Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan Province were recruited and investigated with a self-compiled questionnaire named Socio-demographic and Disease-related Information (Cronbach's α=0.87), Chinese version of the DS- Ⅱ (formed by forward and backward translation, expert review and pre-testing research), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Item scores of the DS- Ⅱ were compared between high and low score groups (the top-ranked and bottom-ranked 27% of patients). The content validity, construct validity, convergence validity, discrimination validity and internal consistency of the Chinese version of DS- Ⅱ were evaluated.
Results Two groups showed significant differences in the score of each of the 16 items of the DS- Ⅱ (P<0.05). The item-total correlation coefficients of the DS- Ⅱ ranged from 0.532 to 0.663 (P<0.05). The items of the scale had adequate content validity (I-CVI=0.83-1.00, S-CVI=0.94). Exploratory factor analysis showed that KMO value was 0.887, Bartlett spherical test χ2=4 018.126, P<0.001. Two common factors with an eigenvalue greater than 1 were extracted by varimax rotation, which could explain 61.342% of the total variation. The load value of each item was more than 0.400, without double load. Both factors 1 and 2 contain 8 items, and the factor attribution of the item is consistent with the original scale. The item-domain correlation coefficients ranged from 0.60 to 0.86, and the inter-domain correlation coefficient was 0.15. The total score of the Chinese version of DS- Ⅱ was positively correlated with the total score (r=0.581), and the anxiety (r=0.443) and depression (r=0.655) subscales scores of the HADS, and also positively correlated with the total score of the ESAS (r=0.512) and its items including pain (r=0.393), tiredness (r=0.266), depression (r=0.497) and anxiety (r=0.418), but was negatively correlated with the score of KPS (r=-0.249, P<0.05). The Cronbach's coefficient of the Chinese version of DS- Ⅱ was 0.877.
Conclusion The Chinese version of DS- Ⅱ has good psychometric properties, which may be a reliable tool for evaluating demoralization syndrome in Chinese cancer patients.