Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (03): 293-298.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0763
Special Issue: 泌尿系统疾病最新文章合辑
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-09-11
Revised:
2024-04-22
Published:
2025-01-20
Online:
2024-10-28
Contact:
WANG Linna
通讯作者:
王林娜
作者简介:
作者贡献:
王林娜设计研究方案,实施研究过程,论文撰写,实施研究过程,分析试验数据;张靖辉实施研究过程,资料搜集整理,论文修改,进行统计学分析。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0763
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | BMI(kg/m2) | 感染部位[例(%)] | 呼吸(次/min) | 心率(次/min) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肺部感染 | 泌尿系感染 | 胆系感染 | 其他 | |||||||
对照组 | 80 | 42/38 | 6.6±1.5 | 15.7±1.5 | 41(51.3) | 22(27.5) | 12(15.0) | 5(6.2) | 25.0±2.4 | 116.9±7.1 |
观察组 | 100 | 49/51 | 6.9±1.6 | 15.9±1.3 | 46(46.0) | 29(29.0) | 17(17.0) | 8(8.0) | 24.6±2.2 | 115.7±6.7 |
t(χ2)值 | 0.218 | 1.285 | 0.958 | 0.588a | 1.164 | 1.163 | ||||
P值 | 0.641 | 0.200 | 0.340 | 0.899 | 0.246 | 0.246 |
Table 1 General situation of the two groups of children
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | BMI(kg/m2) | 感染部位[例(%)] | 呼吸(次/min) | 心率(次/min) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
肺部感染 | 泌尿系感染 | 胆系感染 | 其他 | |||||||
对照组 | 80 | 42/38 | 6.6±1.5 | 15.7±1.5 | 41(51.3) | 22(27.5) | 12(15.0) | 5(6.2) | 25.0±2.4 | 116.9±7.1 |
观察组 | 100 | 49/51 | 6.9±1.6 | 15.9±1.3 | 46(46.0) | 29(29.0) | 17(17.0) | 8(8.0) | 24.6±2.2 | 115.7±6.7 |
t(χ2)值 | 0.218 | 1.285 | 0.958 | 0.588a | 1.164 | 1.163 | ||||
P值 | 0.641 | 0.200 | 0.340 | 0.899 | 0.246 | 0.246 |
组别 | 例数 | SOFA评分 | APACHE Ⅱ评分 |
---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 80 | 4.22±1.39 | 15.06±4.07 |
观察组 | 100 | 5.64±1.71 | 17.09±5.03 |
t值 | 6.007 | 2.924 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
Table 2 Comparison of SOFA scores and APACHE Ⅱ scores between the two groups
组别 | 例数 | SOFA评分 | APACHE Ⅱ评分 |
---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 80 | 4.22±1.39 | 15.06±4.07 |
观察组 | 100 | 5.64±1.71 | 17.09±5.03 |
t值 | 6.007 | 2.924 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
组别 | 例数 | SAA(mg/L) | IL-6(ng/L) | TNF-α(μg/L) | miR-21-3p | miR-182-5p | miR-128-3p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 80 | 176.73±27.83 | 106.89±8.36 | 114.57±20.08 | 0.89±0.08 | 0.36±0.06 | 0.54±0.18 |
观察组 | 100 | 202.82±42.35 | 132.47±11.63 | 136.99±34.51 | 2.61±0.41 | 1.55±0.34 | 0.88±0.23 |
t值 | 4.749 | 16.545 | 5.153 | 36.944 | 30.906 | 10.830 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of serum levels of SAA,IL-6,TNF-α and miR between the two groups
组别 | 例数 | SAA(mg/L) | IL-6(ng/L) | TNF-α(μg/L) | miR-21-3p | miR-182-5p | miR-128-3p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 80 | 176.73±27.83 | 106.89±8.36 | 114.57±20.08 | 0.89±0.08 | 0.36±0.06 | 0.54±0.18 |
观察组 | 100 | 202.82±42.35 | 132.47±11.63 | 136.99±34.51 | 2.61±0.41 | 1.55±0.34 | 0.88±0.23 |
t值 | 4.749 | 16.545 | 5.153 | 36.944 | 30.906 | 10.830 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
指标 | SOFA评分 | APACHE Ⅱ评分 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
SAA | 0.638 | <0.05 | 0.572 | <0.05 |
IL-6 | 0.743 | <0.05 | 0.624 | <0.05 |
TNF-α | 0.624 | <0.05 | 0.617 | <0.05 |
miR-21-3p | 0.755 | <0.05 | 0.746 | <0.05 |
miR-182-5p | 0.801 | <0.05 | 0.741 | <0.05 |
miR-128-3p | 0.763 | <0.05 | 0.724 | <0.05 |
Table 4 Correlation analysis of serum levels of SAA,IL-6,TNF-α and miR with SOFA and APACHEⅡ scores
指标 | SOFA评分 | APACHE Ⅱ评分 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
SAA | 0.638 | <0.05 | 0.572 | <0.05 |
IL-6 | 0.743 | <0.05 | 0.624 | <0.05 |
TNF-α | 0.624 | <0.05 | 0.617 | <0.05 |
miR-21-3p | 0.755 | <0.05 | 0.746 | <0.05 |
miR-182-5p | 0.801 | <0.05 | 0.741 | <0.05 |
miR-128-3p | 0.763 | <0.05 | 0.724 | <0.05 |
分类 | 例数 | SAA(mg/L) | IL-6(ng/L) | TNF-α(μg/L) | miR-21-3p | miR-182-5p | miR-128-3p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生存 | 74 | 183.49±32.92 | 119.85±10.82 | 119.63±18.85 | 2.33±0.24 | 1.17±0.17 | 0.70±0.18 |
死亡 | 26 | 257.83±40.57 | 168.39±11.23 | 186.39±31.24 | 3.41±0.30 | 2.63±0.28 | 1.39±0.21 |
t值 | 9.308 | 19.487 | 12.921 | 18.459 | 31.426 | 16.090 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of serum levels of SAA,IL-6,TNF-α and miR in children with different prognosis survival states in the observation group
分类 | 例数 | SAA(mg/L) | IL-6(ng/L) | TNF-α(μg/L) | miR-21-3p | miR-182-5p | miR-128-3p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生存 | 74 | 183.49±32.92 | 119.85±10.82 | 119.63±18.85 | 2.33±0.24 | 1.17±0.17 | 0.70±0.18 |
死亡 | 26 | 257.83±40.57 | 168.39±11.23 | 186.39±31.24 | 3.41±0.30 | 2.63±0.28 | 1.39±0.21 |
t值 | 9.308 | 19.487 | 12.921 | 18.459 | 31.426 | 16.090 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
指标 | AUC | 95%CI | P值 | 截断值 | 灵敏度 | 特异度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA | 0.806 | 0.714~0.878 | <0.001 | 273.31 mg/L | 0.500 | 0.973 |
IL-6 | 0.749 | 0.652~0.830 | <0.001 | 158.95 ng/L | 0.762 | 0.689 |
TNF-α | 0.794 | 0.702~0.869 | <0.001 | 182.39 μg/L | 0.771 | 0.770 |
miR-21-3p | 0.743 | 0.646~0.825 | <0.001 | 3.34 | 0.692 | 0.757 |
miR-182-5p | 0.821 | 0.731~0.890 | <0.001 | 2.72 | 0.615 | 0.946 |
miR-128-3p | 0.838 | 0.751~0.904 | <0.001 | 1.34 | 0.846 | 0.811 |
联合预测 | 0.926 | 0.856~0.969 | <0.001 | 13.38 | 0.885 | 0.851 |
Table 6 The predictive value of serum levels of SAA,IL-6,TNF-α and miR in sepsis complicated with AKI death
指标 | AUC | 95%CI | P值 | 截断值 | 灵敏度 | 特异度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA | 0.806 | 0.714~0.878 | <0.001 | 273.31 mg/L | 0.500 | 0.973 |
IL-6 | 0.749 | 0.652~0.830 | <0.001 | 158.95 ng/L | 0.762 | 0.689 |
TNF-α | 0.794 | 0.702~0.869 | <0.001 | 182.39 μg/L | 0.771 | 0.770 |
miR-21-3p | 0.743 | 0.646~0.825 | <0.001 | 3.34 | 0.692 | 0.757 |
miR-182-5p | 0.821 | 0.731~0.890 | <0.001 | 2.72 | 0.615 | 0.946 |
miR-128-3p | 0.838 | 0.751~0.904 | <0.001 | 1.34 | 0.846 | 0.811 |
联合预测 | 0.926 | 0.856~0.969 | <0.001 | 13.38 | 0.885 | 0.851 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
王玉华,张国秀,胡莹莹,等. 血浆淀粉样蛋白A和硫化氢水平对脓毒症休克病人诊断及预后价值[J]. 安徽医药,2020,24(6):1101-1105. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2020.06.010.
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
艾晨牧,雷小保,李桂成,等. GLP-1受体通过SIRT3减轻脓毒症急性肾损伤炎症反应及细胞凋亡[J]. 热带医学杂志,2020,20(7):870-874. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3619.2020.07.004.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
中华医学会儿科学分会急救学组,中华医学会急诊医学分会儿科学组,中国医师协会儿童重症医师分会. 儿童脓毒性休克(感染性休克)诊治专家共识(2015版)[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2015,30(22):1687-1691. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2015.22.003.
|
[8] |
郭锦洲. 改善全球肾脏病预后组织(KDIGO)临床实践指南:急性肾损伤[J]. 肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2013,22(1):57-60. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-298X.2013.01.014.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
牛凯旋,吴淑璐,刘成,等. 血清淀粉样蛋白A和白细胞介素-6对脓毒症诊断及病情严重程度评估的临床价值[J]. 中华全科医学,2022,20(9):1484-1487. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002629.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
刘向龙,陈剑明,杨玲,等. 血清TNF-α、SAA在脓毒症休克预后评估中的价值分析[J]. 重庆医学,2023,52(3):374-378. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2023.03.012.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
左爽,周丽娟,袭雷鸣. 脓毒症并发急性肾损伤患儿血清miR-128-3p和miR-22-3p的表达变化及其诊断价值[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志,2021,21(7):540-545. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.w20-248.
|
[22] |
宋微,李虹怡,吕洪波. 血清miR-21-3p、IL-18水平对重症急性胰腺炎患者急性肾损伤的预测价值[J]. 山东医药,2022,62(1):20-24. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2022.01.005.
|
[23] |
郭艳梅,李君娥,孙慧,等. 脓毒症并发急性肾损伤患儿的血清miR-182-5p、miR-21-3p表达变化及其临床意义[J]. 山东医药,2021,61(30):29-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2021.30.007.
|
[24] |
王仁媛,许莉,李超,等. 血清miR-128-3p在脓毒症并发急性肾损伤患儿中的表达及其判断预后的价值[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志,2022,42(4):687-690. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn431460-20201026-00184.
|
[1] | ZHANG Lianfang, ZHENG Yabin, LIN Xuefeng, XIE Rongcheng, MA Jiefei. Clinical Predictive Value of Immature Platelet Fraction Combined with Other Biomarkers for the Severity and Prognosis of Sepsis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(35): 4417-4425. |
[2] | XIE Liying, MAI Tong, ZHOU Gengbiao, LAI Fang, HAN Yun. Analysis and Reflection on the Outcome Indicators in Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Sepsis-induced Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(27): 3418-3427. |
[3] | TILAKEZI Tuersun, WEI Haiyan, NUERBAHAER Remutula, YANG Heyin. Diagnostic Value of Serum NLRP3 Levels and Contrast Agent Dosage in Contrast-induced Nephropathy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(27): 3378-3382. |
[4] | LIU Xiaogang, YANG Shicheng, FU Naikuan, SHAO Dujing, ZHANG Peng. The Impact of Dapagliflozin on the Incidence of Contrast-induced Nephropathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(24): 2994-2999. |
[5] | CHEN Wensheng, LIU Wenming. Research Progress on the Role of Gut Microbiota in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Sepsis-associated Liver Injury [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(21): 2665-2671. |
[6] | PEI Xuejing, SHEN Huaiyun, XU Qianqian, LIU Binbin, WANG Huihui. Risk Factors and Short-term Prognosis of Severe Neonatal Asphyxia Complicated with Acute Kidney Injury [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(15): 1861-1866. |
[7] | HE Yufu, TONG Wenying, WANG Fang, LI Lixia, HE Junbing, SHAO Yiming. Effects of Pre-hospital Metformin Use on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes and Sepsis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1034-1041. |
[8] | LIN Xiaomei, ZUMURETI Abudukiyimu, MA Chunhui, XU Mengge, MA Juxing, LI Xia. Study on the Correlation of Serum Interleukin-6 and Fasting Blood Glucose with Coronary Heart Disease and Adverse Cardiovascular Events [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(03): 286-292. |
[9] | WANG Zhen, SHEN Guoqi, LI Yanan, ZHU Yinghua, QIU Hang, ZHENG Di, XU Tongda, LI Wenhua. Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Contrast-induced Acute Kidney Injury after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3650-3656. |
[10] | WANG Xiaowen, XIAO Tongling, WANG Yi, YANG Ying, XIA Xiaoshuang, LI Xin. Relationship between Homocysteine Level and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3290-3296. |
[11] | Expert group of expert consensus on the application of ulinastatin in common clinical critical illness. Expert Consensus on the Application of Ulinastatin in Common Clinical Critical Illness [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3207-3219. |
[12] | ZUMURETI ·Abudukeyimu, MA Yanlin, ZHU Kairui, LIU Fang, LI Xia. Correlation of Early Growth Response 3 and Interleukin 6 Expression Levels with Coronary Heart Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 3016-3021. |
[13] | YAN Peng, SONG Jianling, FANG Xiangdong. Recent Developments in Parathyroid Hormone Type 1 Receptor and Kidney Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(11): 1398-1403. |
[14] | XU Wei, XU Jiyuan, LI Maoqin, LU Fei, CHENG Shuli. Predictive Value of Color Doppler Ultrasound for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Septic Shock [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1104-1111. |
[15] | Meiying CHEN, Muxin CHEN, Mingxin WANG, Chanmei ZHENG, Wanzhu CAI, Aixin LIANG, Chunjiao ZHOU. Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(30): 3834-3842. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||