Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (23): 2848-2853.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0148
Special Issue: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合集; 老年人群健康最新文章合集; 衰弱最新文章合集; 胰腺炎最新文章合集; 老年问题最新文章合集
• Original Research·Elderly Frailty Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-03-22
Revised:
2023-04-06
Published:
2023-08-15
Online:
2023-04-20
Contact:
WANG Xiaoyun
通讯作者:
王晓云
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0148
组别 | 例数 | 性别〔n(%)〕 | 年龄(岁) | 文化程度〔n(%)〕 | 婚姻状况〔n(%)〕 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 | 女 | 小学及以下 | 初中 | 中专/高中 | 大专 | 本科及以上 | 非在婚 | 在婚 | |||
对照组 | 39 | 18(46.2) | 21(53.8) | 67.4±2.8 | 12(30.8) | 8(20.5) | 10(25.6) | 6(15.4) | 3(7.7) | 10(25.6) | 29(74.4) |
试验组 | 40 | 13(32.5) | 27(67.5) | 67.5±3.1 | 9(22.5) | 10(25.0) | 15(37.5) | 4(10.0) | 2(5.0) | 7(17.5) | 33(82.5) |
检验统计量值 | 1.544 | 0.212a | -0.162b | 0.775 | |||||||
P值 | 0.214 | 0.832 | 0.871 | 0.379 | |||||||
组别 | 居住状况〔n(%)〕 | 个人月收入〔n(%)〕 | 医保类型〔n(%)〕 | 合并慢性病数量〔M(P25,P75),种〕 | |||||||
非独居 | 独居 | <1 000元 | 1 000~2 999元 | 3 000~5 000元 | >5 000元 | 医保 | 新农合 | ||||
对照组 | 28(71.8) | 11(28.2) | 9(23.1) | 11(28.2) | 10(25.6) | 9(23.1) | 22(56.4) | 17(43.6) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | ||
试验组 | 32(80.0) | 8(20.0) | 5(12.5) | 10(25.0) | 11(27.5) | 14(35.0) | 25(62.5) | 15(37.5) | 2.0(1.0,3.0) | ||
检验统计量值 | 0.728 | -1.478b | 0.304 | -1.292b | |||||||
P值 | 0.394 | 0.140 | 0.581 | 0.196 |
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups
组别 | 例数 | 性别〔n(%)〕 | 年龄(岁) | 文化程度〔n(%)〕 | 婚姻状况〔n(%)〕 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 | 女 | 小学及以下 | 初中 | 中专/高中 | 大专 | 本科及以上 | 非在婚 | 在婚 | |||
对照组 | 39 | 18(46.2) | 21(53.8) | 67.4±2.8 | 12(30.8) | 8(20.5) | 10(25.6) | 6(15.4) | 3(7.7) | 10(25.6) | 29(74.4) |
试验组 | 40 | 13(32.5) | 27(67.5) | 67.5±3.1 | 9(22.5) | 10(25.0) | 15(37.5) | 4(10.0) | 2(5.0) | 7(17.5) | 33(82.5) |
检验统计量值 | 1.544 | 0.212a | -0.162b | 0.775 | |||||||
P值 | 0.214 | 0.832 | 0.871 | 0.379 | |||||||
组别 | 居住状况〔n(%)〕 | 个人月收入〔n(%)〕 | 医保类型〔n(%)〕 | 合并慢性病数量〔M(P25,P75),种〕 | |||||||
非独居 | 独居 | <1 000元 | 1 000~2 999元 | 3 000~5 000元 | >5 000元 | 医保 | 新农合 | ||||
对照组 | 28(71.8) | 11(28.2) | 9(23.1) | 11(28.2) | 10(25.6) | 9(23.1) | 22(56.4) | 17(43.6) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | ||
试验组 | 32(80.0) | 8(20.0) | 5(12.5) | 10(25.0) | 11(27.5) | 14(35.0) | 25(62.5) | 15(37.5) | 2.0(1.0,3.0) | ||
检验统计量值 | 0.728 | -1.478b | 0.304 | -1.292b | |||||||
P值 | 0.394 | 0.140 | 0.581 | 0.196 |
组别 | 例数 | 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Wald χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 39 | 22(20,23) | 22(21,23)a | 21(21,22)ab | 24.078 | <0.001 |
试验组 | 40 | 22(22,23) | 23(22,23) | 24(23,25)ab | 150.179 | <0.001 |
Wald χ2值 | 0.608 | 2.471 | 47.410 | |||
P值 | 0.435 | 0.116 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of MoCA score between the two groups
组别 | 例数 | 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Wald χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 39 | 22(20,23) | 22(21,23)a | 21(21,22)ab | 24.078 | <0.001 |
试验组 | 40 | 22(22,23) | 23(22,23) | 24(23,25)ab | 150.179 | <0.001 |
Wald χ2值 | 0.608 | 2.471 | 47.410 | |||
P值 | 0.435 | 0.116 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | FP评分(分) | 步速(m/s) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 39 | 3(2,3) | 3(3,3) | 3(3,4)ab | 18.759 | <0.001 | 0.71(0.62,0.77) | 0.70(0.59,0.73)a | 0.67(0.56,0.71)ab | 184.445 | <0.001 |
试验组 | 40 | 3(2,3) | 2(2,3)a | 2(1,2)ab | 241.397 | <0.001 | 0.67(0.57,0.78) | 0.71(0.62,0.82)a | 0.78(0.69,0.87)ab | 384.314 | <0.001 |
Waldχ2值 | 0.025 | 15.041 | 66.476 | 0.408 | 3.469 | 32.143 | |||||
P值 | 0.874 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.523 | 0.063 | <0.001 | |||||
组别 | 握力(kg) | ||||||||||
基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | |||||||
对照组 | 20.20(17.20,27.00) | 19.40(16.20,26.20)a | 19.30(16.00,26.00)ab | 2 463.486 | <0.001 | ||||||
试验组 | 18.50(16.30,27.75) | 19.75(17.53,28.85)a | 20.70(18.28,29.88)ab | 6 003.341 | <0.001 | ||||||
Waldχ2值 | 0.185 | 1.474 | 4.735 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.667 | 0.225 | 0.030 |
Table 3 Comparison of frailty indicators between the two groups
组别 | 例数 | FP评分(分) | 步速(m/s) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 39 | 3(2,3) | 3(3,3) | 3(3,4)ab | 18.759 | <0.001 | 0.71(0.62,0.77) | 0.70(0.59,0.73)a | 0.67(0.56,0.71)ab | 184.445 | <0.001 |
试验组 | 40 | 3(2,3) | 2(2,3)a | 2(1,2)ab | 241.397 | <0.001 | 0.67(0.57,0.78) | 0.71(0.62,0.82)a | 0.78(0.69,0.87)ab | 384.314 | <0.001 |
Waldχ2值 | 0.025 | 15.041 | 66.476 | 0.408 | 3.469 | 32.143 | |||||
P值 | 0.874 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.523 | 0.063 | <0.001 | |||||
组别 | 握力(kg) | ||||||||||
基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | |||||||
对照组 | 20.20(17.20,27.00) | 19.40(16.20,26.20)a | 19.30(16.00,26.00)ab | 2 463.486 | <0.001 | ||||||
试验组 | 18.50(16.30,27.75) | 19.75(17.53,28.85)a | 20.70(18.28,29.88)ab | 6 003.341 | <0.001 | ||||||
Waldχ2值 | 0.185 | 1.474 | 4.735 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.667 | 0.225 | 0.030 |
组别 | 例数 | 基线 | 干预12周 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 39 | 8.89±1.48 | 8.76±1.50 | 4.951 | <0.001 |
试验组 | 40 | 8.57±1.41 | 8.07±1.36 | 17.865 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.975 | 2.139 | |||
P值 | 0.332 | 0.036 |
Table 4 Comparison of HbA1c level between the two groups
组别 | 例数 | 基线 | 干预12周 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 39 | 8.89±1.48 | 8.76±1.50 | 4.951 | <0.001 |
试验组 | 40 | 8.57±1.41 | 8.07±1.36 | 17.865 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.975 | 2.139 | |||
P值 | 0.332 | 0.036 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
孔令磷,赵慧敏,刘玥婷,等. 社区老年2型糖尿病患者认知衰弱现状及影响因素[J]. 护理学杂志,2020,35(7):89-92. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.07.089.
|
[3] |
张爽,陈影,姜宗良,等. 社区老年糖尿病患者认知衰弱现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国护理管理,2020,20(3):383-388. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.03.014.
|
[4] |
刘泳秀,韩婷,余莉,等. 老年2型糖尿病患者认知衰弱现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制,2021,29(6):426-431. DOI:10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2021.06.006.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] | |
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
葛均波,徐永健,王辰. 内科学[M]. 9版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:733.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
湾明月. 基于海马亚区体积探索八段锦改善认知衰弱症的机制[D]. 福州:福建中医药大学,2021.
|
[13] |
国家体育总局健身气功管理中心. 健身气功·八段锦[M]. 北京:人民体育出版社,2003.
|
[14] |
葛守萍. 中老年保健操(手指操)[EB/OL]. (2019-10-24)[2022-12-31].
|
[15] |
范静波,卢国华,张莹莹,等. 团体认知干预对社区MCI老人认知功能的影响[J]. 中国护理管理,2013,13(11):70-72. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2013.011.022.
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
虎子颖,赵志刚,张会峰,等. 2型糖尿病患者轻度认知功能障碍与海马体积及血清抵抗素的相关性研究[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志,2015,23(4):331-333. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6187.2015.04.013.
|
[18] |
陈婉君. 2型糖尿病患者认知功能的流行病学特点及筛查工具研究[D]. 重庆:重庆医科大学,2012.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
应巧燕,刘华平,郭欣颖,等. 老年人衰弱筛查和评估的证据总结[J]. 护理学杂志,2017,32(1):95-98. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.01.095.
|
[21] |
张爽,陈影,孙娜雅,等. 综合运动训练对老年糖尿病患者衰弱和躯体功能的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志,2020,55(10):1445-1451. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.10.001.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
认知训练中国专家共识写作组,中国医师协会神经内科医师分会认知障碍疾病专业委员会. 认知训练中国专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志,2019,99(1):4-8. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.01.002.
|
[28] |
|
[29] | |
[30] | |
[31] |
王梅杰,廖春满,张正媚,等. 八段锦对2型糖尿病患者血糖血脂水平等辅助治疗效果影响的Meta分析[J]. 北京中医药,2021,40(2):179-184. DOI:10.16025/j.1674-1307.2021.02.019.
|
[32] |
高志鹏. 八段锦对衰弱前期老年人衰弱状态及下肢运动功能的康复效果[D]. 唐山:华北理工大学,2020.
|
[33] |
韩君,王君俏,高键,等. 弹力带运动联合认知训练对社区老年人认知衰弱的干预效果[J]. 护理研究,2022,36(4):624-629. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2022.04.010.
|
[34] |
魏璐璐,朱泓吉,朱琳,等. 八段锦对2型糖尿病患者血糖影响的meta分析[J]. 湘南学院学报,2021,42(5):71-75,95. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-8173.2021.05.013.
|
[35] |
|
[1] | ZHAO Hongbo, WU Xiaojing, YANG Yun, GE Zhiming, FAN Xianxian, ZHAO Lan, WANG Hongwei. Analysis of the Efficacy of Tiaozhong Yiqi Soup on Elderly Qi Deficiency Type Slow Transit Constipation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(12): 1487-1492. |
[2] | JIN Menglong, QIN Xiaoying, MALIYA Amiti, JIAZINI Nuerbai, LI Jianxin, CAO Jie, LUO Sifu, LIU Cheng, ZHANG Yuchen, GAI Mintao, LI Yanpeng, LU Xiangfeng, FU Zhenyan. Status and Influencing Factors of Dyslipidemia, Hypertension and Diabetes Comorbidities among Kazakhs in Xinjiang [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(12): 1438-1444. |
[3] | LIU Ying, JIANG Juncheng, JING Huiquan. Correlation of Regional Differences in the Prevalence and Types of Chronic Diseases among Middle-aged and Elderly People with Health Resources Allocation in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(12): 1452-1459. |
[4] | KANG Jing, ZHANG Ci, ZHANG Zhengyi. Distribution and Influencing Factors of Chronic Comorbidities among Middle-aged Inpatients in General Practice Department of Tertiary General Hospitals [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(11): 1310-1315. |
[5] | LIANG Dong, YANG Chenglin, LIN Xiaoru, ZHAO Yang, OUYANG Jiang, LIN Xiuquan. Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Attributable to Diabetes among Chinese Adults from 1990 to 2019 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(11): 1380-1386. |
[6] | XIE Yi, XU Junma, XU Fangqin, LI Chao, CHEN Chen, SHAO Chan. Predictive Value of Sarcopenia Index for Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(11): 1326-1330. |
[7] | WANG Wenjuan, WANG Rui, ZENG Hongji, LIU Yahui, WEI Shufan, TIAN Qingfeng. Relationship between Serum Liver Transaminase and Metabolic Syndrome in the Aged Based on Restrictive Cubic Spline Model [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(11): 1337-1342. |
[8] | SHI Yushuang, WANG Huihua, LI Yan, LU Ping, SONG Wei, PAN Guijun. Analysis of the Effectiveness of Different Atrial Fibrillation Screening Methods in the Community-based Elderly Population [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(11): 1316-1319. |
[9] | XU Li, GE Jing, YU Peng, YU Ying. Shifts in Chronic Disease and Comorbidity Patterns among Chinese Older Adults: an Analysis Based on the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(11): 1296-1302. |
[10] | ZHANG Shengnan, XU Shihua, HUANG Rongchao, CHEN Jian, ZHAO Chunru, MENG Minglyu, MA Yingjiao. Trend and Forecast Analysis of Premature Mortality Probability by Four Major Non-communicable Diseases in Baise from 2015 to 2021 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(11): 1387-1394. |
[11] | DAI Zhenwei, ZHANG Ling, ZHANG Haoran, XIAO Weijun, WANG Hao, HUANG Yiman, JING Shu, CHEN Xu, FU Jiaqi, WU Yijin, GAO Lei, SU Xiaoyou. Influencing Factors of Blood Glucose Monitoring in Middle-aged and Elderly Patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus in Rural Areas [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(10): 1194-1200. |
[12] | YU Xinyan, SU Peng, YUAN Xiaojing, JIANG Qingru, YANG Jianyun, ZHAO Xudong, WANG Yifan, ZHANG Haicheng. A Study on the Factors Influencing the Comprehensive Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Elderly Patients with Chronic Disease in Primary Care [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(10): 1186-1193. |
[13] | ZHU Chenli, ZHANG Tiancheng, LI Hui, FENG Zhengwen, CHEN Xiaolei, SHAO Shuang, DU Juan. The Development of Quality Indicator System for the Home Care Services for the Disabled Elderly in Beijing [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(10): 1215-1220. |
[14] | GAO Chuan, LI Qingyin, KE Dandan, ZHOU Yuyu, ZHANG Yuyang, HE Zhong. The Utilization of Health Checkup Services among People Aged 45 and above in China: a National Cross-sectional Survey Based on CHARLS 2018 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(10): 1179-1185. |
[15] | LI Ziyue, FANG Jiawen, LIN Kaicheng. Analysis and Prediction of the Disease Burden of Type 2 Diabetes Attributable to High Body Mass Index in China from 1990 to 2019 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(09): 1126-1133. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||