
Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (23): 2848-2853.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0148
Special Issue: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合辑; 衰弱最新文章合辑; 胰腺炎最新文章合辑; 老年问题最新文章合辑; 老年人群健康最新文章合辑
• Original Research·Elderly Frailty Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2023-03-22
Revised:2023-04-06
Published:2023-08-15
Online:2023-04-20
Contact:
WANG Xiaoyun
通讯作者:
王晓云
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0148
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别〔n(%)〕 | 年龄(岁) | 文化程度〔n(%)〕 | 婚姻状况〔n(%)〕 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | 小学及以下 | 初中 | 中专/高中 | 大专 | 本科及以上 | 非在婚 | 在婚 | |||
| 对照组 | 39 | 18(46.2) | 21(53.8) | 67.4±2.8 | 12(30.8) | 8(20.5) | 10(25.6) | 6(15.4) | 3(7.7) | 10(25.6) | 29(74.4) |
| 试验组 | 40 | 13(32.5) | 27(67.5) | 67.5±3.1 | 9(22.5) | 10(25.0) | 15(37.5) | 4(10.0) | 2(5.0) | 7(17.5) | 33(82.5) |
| 检验统计量值 | 1.544 | 0.212a | -0.162b | 0.775 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.214 | 0.832 | 0.871 | 0.379 | |||||||
| 组别 | 居住状况〔n(%)〕 | 个人月收入〔n(%)〕 | 医保类型〔n(%)〕 | 合并慢性病数量〔M(P25,P75),种〕 | |||||||
| 非独居 | 独居 | <1 000元 | 1 000~2 999元 | 3 000~5 000元 | >5 000元 | 医保 | 新农合 | ||||
| 对照组 | 28(71.8) | 11(28.2) | 9(23.1) | 11(28.2) | 10(25.6) | 9(23.1) | 22(56.4) | 17(43.6) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | ||
| 试验组 | 32(80.0) | 8(20.0) | 5(12.5) | 10(25.0) | 11(27.5) | 14(35.0) | 25(62.5) | 15(37.5) | 2.0(1.0,3.0) | ||
| 检验统计量值 | 0.728 | -1.478b | 0.304 | -1.292b | |||||||
| P值 | 0.394 | 0.140 | 0.581 | 0.196 | |||||||
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别〔n(%)〕 | 年龄(岁) | 文化程度〔n(%)〕 | 婚姻状况〔n(%)〕 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | 小学及以下 | 初中 | 中专/高中 | 大专 | 本科及以上 | 非在婚 | 在婚 | |||
| 对照组 | 39 | 18(46.2) | 21(53.8) | 67.4±2.8 | 12(30.8) | 8(20.5) | 10(25.6) | 6(15.4) | 3(7.7) | 10(25.6) | 29(74.4) |
| 试验组 | 40 | 13(32.5) | 27(67.5) | 67.5±3.1 | 9(22.5) | 10(25.0) | 15(37.5) | 4(10.0) | 2(5.0) | 7(17.5) | 33(82.5) |
| 检验统计量值 | 1.544 | 0.212a | -0.162b | 0.775 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.214 | 0.832 | 0.871 | 0.379 | |||||||
| 组别 | 居住状况〔n(%)〕 | 个人月收入〔n(%)〕 | 医保类型〔n(%)〕 | 合并慢性病数量〔M(P25,P75),种〕 | |||||||
| 非独居 | 独居 | <1 000元 | 1 000~2 999元 | 3 000~5 000元 | >5 000元 | 医保 | 新农合 | ||||
| 对照组 | 28(71.8) | 11(28.2) | 9(23.1) | 11(28.2) | 10(25.6) | 9(23.1) | 22(56.4) | 17(43.6) | 2.0(2.0,3.0) | ||
| 试验组 | 32(80.0) | 8(20.0) | 5(12.5) | 10(25.0) | 11(27.5) | 14(35.0) | 25(62.5) | 15(37.5) | 2.0(1.0,3.0) | ||
| 检验统计量值 | 0.728 | -1.478b | 0.304 | -1.292b | |||||||
| P值 | 0.394 | 0.140 | 0.581 | 0.196 | |||||||
| 组别 | 例数 | 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Wald χ2值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 39 | 22(20,23) | 22(21,23)a | 21(21,22)ab | 24.078 | <0.001 |
| 试验组 | 40 | 22(22,23) | 23(22,23) | 24(23,25)ab | 150.179 | <0.001 |
| Wald χ2值 | 0.608 | 2.471 | 47.410 | |||
| P值 | 0.435 | 0.116 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of MoCA score between the two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Wald χ2值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 39 | 22(20,23) | 22(21,23)a | 21(21,22)ab | 24.078 | <0.001 |
| 试验组 | 40 | 22(22,23) | 23(22,23) | 24(23,25)ab | 150.179 | <0.001 |
| Wald χ2值 | 0.608 | 2.471 | 47.410 | |||
| P值 | 0.435 | 0.116 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 例数 | FP评分(分) | 步速(m/s) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 39 | 3(2,3) | 3(3,3) | 3(3,4)ab | 18.759 | <0.001 | 0.71(0.62,0.77) | 0.70(0.59,0.73)a | 0.67(0.56,0.71)ab | 184.445 | <0.001 |
| 试验组 | 40 | 3(2,3) | 2(2,3)a | 2(1,2)ab | 241.397 | <0.001 | 0.67(0.57,0.78) | 0.71(0.62,0.82)a | 0.78(0.69,0.87)ab | 384.314 | <0.001 |
| Waldχ2值 | 0.025 | 15.041 | 66.476 | 0.408 | 3.469 | 32.143 | |||||
| P值 | 0.874 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.523 | 0.063 | <0.001 | |||||
| 组别 | 握力(kg) | ||||||||||
| 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | |||||||
| 对照组 | 20.20(17.20,27.00) | 19.40(16.20,26.20)a | 19.30(16.00,26.00)ab | 2 463.486 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 试验组 | 18.50(16.30,27.75) | 19.75(17.53,28.85)a | 20.70(18.28,29.88)ab | 6 003.341 | <0.001 | ||||||
| Waldχ2值 | 0.185 | 1.474 | 4.735 | ||||||||
| P值 | 0.667 | 0.225 | 0.030 | ||||||||
Table 3 Comparison of frailty indicators between the two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | FP评分(分) | 步速(m/s) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 39 | 3(2,3) | 3(3,3) | 3(3,4)ab | 18.759 | <0.001 | 0.71(0.62,0.77) | 0.70(0.59,0.73)a | 0.67(0.56,0.71)ab | 184.445 | <0.001 |
| 试验组 | 40 | 3(2,3) | 2(2,3)a | 2(1,2)ab | 241.397 | <0.001 | 0.67(0.57,0.78) | 0.71(0.62,0.82)a | 0.78(0.69,0.87)ab | 384.314 | <0.001 |
| Waldχ2值 | 0.025 | 15.041 | 66.476 | 0.408 | 3.469 | 32.143 | |||||
| P值 | 0.874 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.523 | 0.063 | <0.001 | |||||
| 组别 | 握力(kg) | ||||||||||
| 基线 | 干预6周 | 干预12周 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | |||||||
| 对照组 | 20.20(17.20,27.00) | 19.40(16.20,26.20)a | 19.30(16.00,26.00)ab | 2 463.486 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 试验组 | 18.50(16.30,27.75) | 19.75(17.53,28.85)a | 20.70(18.28,29.88)ab | 6 003.341 | <0.001 | ||||||
| Waldχ2值 | 0.185 | 1.474 | 4.735 | ||||||||
| P值 | 0.667 | 0.225 | 0.030 | ||||||||
| 组别 | 例数 | 基线 | 干预12周 | t配对值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 39 | 8.89±1.48 | 8.76±1.50 | 4.951 | <0.001 |
| 试验组 | 40 | 8.57±1.41 | 8.07±1.36 | 17.865 | <0.001 |
| t值 | 0.975 | 2.139 | |||
| P值 | 0.332 | 0.036 |
Table 4 Comparison of HbA1c level between the two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | 基线 | 干预12周 | t配对值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 39 | 8.89±1.48 | 8.76±1.50 | 4.951 | <0.001 |
| 试验组 | 40 | 8.57±1.41 | 8.07±1.36 | 17.865 | <0.001 |
| t值 | 0.975 | 2.139 | |||
| P值 | 0.332 | 0.036 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
孔令磷,赵慧敏,刘玥婷,等. 社区老年2型糖尿病患者认知衰弱现状及影响因素[J]. 护理学杂志,2020,35(7):89-92. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.07.089.
|
| [3] |
张爽,陈影,姜宗良,等. 社区老年糖尿病患者认知衰弱现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国护理管理,2020,20(3):383-388. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.03.014.
|
| [4] |
刘泳秀,韩婷,余莉,等. 老年2型糖尿病患者认知衰弱现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制,2021,29(6):426-431. DOI:10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2021.06.006.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] | |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
葛均波,徐永健,王辰. 内科学[M]. 9版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:733.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
湾明月. 基于海马亚区体积探索八段锦改善认知衰弱症的机制[D]. 福州:福建中医药大学,2021.
|
| [13] |
国家体育总局健身气功管理中心. 健身气功·八段锦[M]. 北京:人民体育出版社,2003.
|
| [14] |
葛守萍. 中老年保健操(手指操)[EB/OL]. (2019-10-24)[2022-12-31].
|
| [15] |
范静波,卢国华,张莹莹,等. 团体认知干预对社区MCI老人认知功能的影响[J]. 中国护理管理,2013,13(11):70-72. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2013.011.022.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
虎子颖,赵志刚,张会峰,等. 2型糖尿病患者轻度认知功能障碍与海马体积及血清抵抗素的相关性研究[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志,2015,23(4):331-333. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6187.2015.04.013.
|
| [18] |
陈婉君. 2型糖尿病患者认知功能的流行病学特点及筛查工具研究[D]. 重庆:重庆医科大学,2012.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
应巧燕,刘华平,郭欣颖,等. 老年人衰弱筛查和评估的证据总结[J]. 护理学杂志,2017,32(1):95-98. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.01.095.
|
| [21] |
张爽,陈影,孙娜雅,等. 综合运动训练对老年糖尿病患者衰弱和躯体功能的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志,2020,55(10):1445-1451. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.10.001.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
认知训练中国专家共识写作组,中国医师协会神经内科医师分会认知障碍疾病专业委员会. 认知训练中国专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志,2019,99(1):4-8. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.01.002.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] | |
| [30] | |
| [31] |
王梅杰,廖春满,张正媚,等. 八段锦对2型糖尿病患者血糖血脂水平等辅助治疗效果影响的Meta分析[J]. 北京中医药,2021,40(2):179-184. DOI:10.16025/j.1674-1307.2021.02.019.
|
| [32] |
高志鹏. 八段锦对衰弱前期老年人衰弱状态及下肢运动功能的康复效果[D]. 唐山:华北理工大学,2020.
|
| [33] |
韩君,王君俏,高键,等. 弹力带运动联合认知训练对社区老年人认知衰弱的干预效果[J]. 护理研究,2022,36(4):624-629. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2022.04.010.
|
| [34] |
魏璐璐,朱泓吉,朱琳,等. 八段锦对2型糖尿病患者血糖影响的meta分析[J]. 湘南学院学报,2021,42(5):71-75,95. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-8173.2021.05.013.
|
| [35] |
|
| [1] | LI Jiawei, GAO Xinyi, GE Aoqi, LI Juanjuan, YUAN Beibei. Demand and Associated Factors for Integrated Medical Care and Preventive Services among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 3028-3039. |
| [2] | LI Wenping, CHEN Jianhua, XU Jiapei, JIN Xue, PAN Zihan, CHI Chunhua. A Scoping Review on the Empowerment of Community Elderly Health Services by Digital-Intelligent Health Management Platforms [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2938-2949. |
| [3] | WANG Yang, ZHAO Shiting, CHEN Yingying, SUN Zilin, QIU Shanhu. Key Points of Exercise Intervention and Implementation for People with Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2989-2994. |
| [4] | CHAI Zhihao, ZHANG Weisen, LUO Jiaoling, ZHU Feng, ZHU Tong, JIN Yali, PAN Jing, LU Yingjun, JIANG Chaoqiang. The Mediation Effect of Socioeconomic Status in Childhood Parental Literacy and Cognitive Function in Middle-aged and Older People: Based on Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2959-2966. |
| [5] | PAN Ziyun, YIN Hao, LIN Zhirou, MAO Jingyi, HUANG Yan, LUO Yanhua, XIAO Jiafu, HU Yin. From Mechanism to Therapy: Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2982-2988. |
| [6] | AN Yanhong, WANG Shidong, LI Xiaoran, GUO Jiayang, WANG Zhe, SHA Peilin, MENG Yijun, LI Xiaoxuan, SHI Xue, YU Zexing, XIAO Yonghua. Study on Risk Factors and Nomogram Prediction Model for Diabetic Kidney Disease: Based on Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Technology [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2995-3003. |
| [7] | LI Feng, HU Changhao, LUO Xu. Progress in the Study of Influencing Factors and Intervention Strategies of Mental Health in Elderly Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2816-2828. |
| [8] | GE Dan, WANG Zhi, DING Qun, GUO Tonglan, XU Tongdao. Relationship between Remnant Cholesterol and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease as well as Progressive Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2854-2859. |
| [9] | ZHANG Xiaojuan, LIU Yang, PENG Bo, YE Yuan, ZHU Kun. Study on the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus in Community Hospital [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2614-2620. |
| [10] | PANG Shu, SUN ying, JIANG Chunyan. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Fried's Frailty Phenotype and the FRAIL Scale in Assessing Pre-frailty among Community-dwelling Older Adults Undergoing Health Examinations [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2664-2670. |
| [11] | JIAN Yingchun, ZENG Yongqin, ZHANG Haiping, WANG Zhengdi, AN Ke, YAN Rui. Recent Advances in Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Chronic Metabolic Diseases [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(18): 2577-2584. |
| [12] | LI Yachan, YANG Yang, XU Qianting, KE Tingyu. Association between the Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index and Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(18): 2482-2488. |
| [13] | LI Menglin, DING Fang, QIAN Yu, PU Dong, DU Qianqian, GUAN Tianhang, HE Yilin. Study on Glycemic Control Status and Influencing Factors among Community Diabetic Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2334-2339. |
| [14] | LI Simin, ZHANG Tingting, WANG Kunbo, YANG Jianzhou, PING Weiwei. Effects of Exercise Dosage on Elderly Patients with Sarcopenia: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2400-2409. |
| [15] | FU Mingyuan, YU Xiaoyi, GE Caiying, KONG Min. Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia: Prevalence and Determinants among Community-based Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2252-2258. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||