Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (24): 3050-3060.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0056
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-12-20
Revised:
2023-03-10
Published:
2023-08-20
Online:
2023-03-28
Contact:
HAN Wei
通讯作者:
韩为
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0056
基因名称 | 扩增长度(bp) | 上游引物(5'→3') | 下游引物(5'→3') |
---|---|---|---|
β-actin | 150 | CCCATCTATGAGGGTTACGC | TTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC |
U6 | 94 | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
Cyp-D | 101 | ATCCTTAGCAAGTGTCTCGG | CTGGTCAAGGAAAAAGGCAG |
GSK-3β | 113 | ACTTTGGAAGTGCAAAGCAG | ACTAGACGTGTAATCGGTGG |
Cyt-C | 86 | TAAGACTGGACCAAACCTCC | TGTTCTTGTTGGCATCTGTG |
Caspase-3 | 138 | ATGTCGATGCAGCTAACCTC | AACTGCTCCTTTTGCTGTGA |
miR-124-3p | 64 | ACACTCCAGCTGGGTAAGGCACGCGGTG | TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG |
miR-124-3p-RT | CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGGGCATT |
Table 1 Primer sequence of target gene and internal reference gene
基因名称 | 扩增长度(bp) | 上游引物(5'→3') | 下游引物(5'→3') |
---|---|---|---|
β-actin | 150 | CCCATCTATGAGGGTTACGC | TTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC |
U6 | 94 | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
Cyp-D | 101 | ATCCTTAGCAAGTGTCTCGG | CTGGTCAAGGAAAAAGGCAG |
GSK-3β | 113 | ACTTTGGAAGTGCAAAGCAG | ACTAGACGTGTAATCGGTGG |
Cyt-C | 86 | TAAGACTGGACCAAACCTCC | TGTTCTTGTTGGCATCTGTG |
Caspase-3 | 138 | ATGTCGATGCAGCTAACCTC | AACTGCTCCTTTTGCTGTGA |
miR-124-3p | 64 | ACACTCCAGCTGGGTAAGGCACGCGGTG | TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG |
miR-124-3p-RT | CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGGGCATT |
组别 | 只数 | mNSS评分〔M(P25,P75),分〕 | 只数 | 相对脑梗死体积( |
---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 20 | 0(0,0) | 5 | 0 |
模型组 | 20 | 10(10,11)a | 5 | 34.95±3.80a |
电针组 | 20 | 6(6,7)b | 5 | 22.37±3.73b |
抑制剂组 | 20 | 6(5,7)b | 5 | 17.88±1.90b |
电针+激动剂组 | 20 | 10(9,10)c | 5 | 30.85±1.56c |
F(H)值 | 86.638 | 135.041e | ||
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of mNSS score and infarct volume of brain tissue of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | mNSS评分〔M(P25,P75),分〕 | 只数 | 相对脑梗死体积( |
---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 20 | 0(0,0) | 5 | 0 |
模型组 | 20 | 10(10,11)a | 5 | 34.95±3.80a |
电针组 | 20 | 6(6,7)b | 5 | 22.37±3.73b |
抑制剂组 | 20 | 6(5,7)b | 5 | 17.88±1.90b |
电针+激动剂组 | 20 | 10(9,10)c | 5 | 30.85±1.56c |
F(H)值 | 86.638 | 135.041e | ||
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 只数 | AI(%) | GSK-3β | p-GSK-3β | Cyp-D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 5 | 15.68±2.07 | 0.59±0.02 | 0.61±0.03 | 0.14±0.01 |
模型组 | 5 | 60.14±2.70a | 0.60±0.04 | 0.16±0.02a | 0.61±0.04a |
电针组 | 5 | 37.14±1.91b | 0.59±0.02 | 0.37±0.04b | 0.37±0.02b |
抑制剂组 | 5 | 28.98±1.96bc | 0.59±0.01 | 0.50±0.03bc | 0.28±0.02bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 5 | 41.28±2.75bc | 0.60±0.05 | 0.27±0.03bc | 0.46±0.04bc |
F值 | 251.206 | 0.205 | 157.005 | 193.968 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.932 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of AI,GSK-3β,p-GSK-3β,Cyp-D protein positive expression in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | AI(%) | GSK-3β | p-GSK-3β | Cyp-D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 5 | 15.68±2.07 | 0.59±0.02 | 0.61±0.03 | 0.14±0.01 |
模型组 | 5 | 60.14±2.70a | 0.60±0.04 | 0.16±0.02a | 0.61±0.04a |
电针组 | 5 | 37.14±1.91b | 0.59±0.02 | 0.37±0.04b | 0.37±0.02b |
抑制剂组 | 5 | 28.98±1.96bc | 0.59±0.01 | 0.50±0.03bc | 0.28±0.02bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 5 | 41.28±2.75bc | 0.60±0.05 | 0.27±0.03bc | 0.46±0.04bc |
F值 | 251.206 | 0.205 | 157.005 | 193.968 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.932 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 只数 | miR-124-3p | GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 6 | 1.00±0.05 | 1.02±0.03 | 0.91±0.14 | 0.97±0.08 | 0.98±0.05 |
模型组 | 6 | 1.94±0.10a | 0.48±0.11a | 2.32±0.11a | 2.78±0.04a | 1.92±0.11a |
电针组 | 6 | 1.32±0.05b | 0.79±0.08b | 1.88±0.24b | 2.09±0.14b | 1.38±0.03b |
抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.16±0.01bc | 0.94±0.05bc | 1.40±0.16bc | 1.59±0.05bc | 1.24±0.05bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 1.46±0.06bc | 0.68±0.05c | 2.06±0.08b | 2.42±0.05bc | 1.59±0.08bc |
F值 | 664.668 | 57.980 | 78.919 | 487.748 | 162.193 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of miR-124-3p,GSK-3β,Cyp-D,Cyt-C,Caspase-3 mRNA expressions in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | miR-124-3p | GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 6 | 1.00±0.05 | 1.02±0.03 | 0.91±0.14 | 0.97±0.08 | 0.98±0.05 |
模型组 | 6 | 1.94±0.10a | 0.48±0.11a | 2.32±0.11a | 2.78±0.04a | 1.92±0.11a |
电针组 | 6 | 1.32±0.05b | 0.79±0.08b | 1.88±0.24b | 2.09±0.14b | 1.38±0.03b |
抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.16±0.01bc | 0.94±0.05bc | 1.40±0.16bc | 1.59±0.05bc | 1.24±0.05bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 1.46±0.06bc | 0.68±0.05c | 2.06±0.08b | 2.42±0.05bc | 1.59±0.08bc |
F值 | 664.668 | 57.980 | 78.919 | 487.748 | 162.193 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 5 Comparison of p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β protein expression ratio and GSK-3β,Cyp-D,Cyt-C,Caspase-3 protein expressions in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 6 | 0.95±0.18 | 0.25±0.06 | 0.08±0.05 | 0.10±0.02 |
模型组 | 6 | 0.37±0.13a | 0.95±0.12a | 0.82±0.10a | 0.79±0.14a |
电针组 | 6 | 0.62±0.13b | 0.51±0.09b | 0.43±0.12b | 0.46±0.13bc |
抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.73±0.10b | 0.36±0.03bc | 0.10±0.06bc | 0.31±0.08b |
电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 0.47±0.11bc | 0.75±0.11bc | 0.60±0.09bc | 0.62±0.09bc |
F值 | 17.343 | 65.481 | 80.363 | 41.303 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β protein expression ratio and GSK-3β,Cyp-D,Cyt-C,Caspase-3 protein expressions in cerebral cortex of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | p-GSK-3β/ GSK-3β | Cyp-D | Cyt-C | Caspase-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
假手术组 | 6 | 0.95±0.18 | 0.25±0.06 | 0.08±0.05 | 0.10±0.02 |
模型组 | 6 | 0.37±0.13a | 0.95±0.12a | 0.82±0.10a | 0.79±0.14a |
电针组 | 6 | 0.62±0.13b | 0.51±0.09b | 0.43±0.12b | 0.46±0.13bc |
抑制剂组 | 6 | 0.73±0.10b | 0.36±0.03bc | 0.10±0.06bc | 0.31±0.08b |
电针+激动剂组 | 6 | 0.47±0.11bc | 0.75±0.11bc | 0.60±0.09bc | 0.62±0.09bc |
F值 | 17.343 | 65.481 | 80.363 | 41.303 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 只数 | MPTP阳性细胞率(%) |
---|---|---|
假手术组 | 4 | 20.575±2.085 |
模型组 | 4 | 0.865±0.207a |
电针组 | 4 | 6.753±0.076b |
抑制剂组 | 4 | 16.350±0.493bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 4 | 2.690±0.338bc |
F值 | 313.385 | |
P值 | <0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of openness degree of MPTP in cerebral cortex neurons of rats in each group
组别 | 只数 | MPTP阳性细胞率(%) |
---|---|---|
假手术组 | 4 | 20.575±2.085 |
模型组 | 4 | 0.865±0.207a |
电针组 | 4 | 6.753±0.076b |
抑制剂组 | 4 | 16.350±0.493bc |
电针+激动剂组 | 4 | 2.690±0.338bc |
F值 | 313.385 | |
P值 | <0.001 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
余曙光,徐斌. 实验针灸学[M]. 3版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2021.
|
[18] |
包新杰,赵浩,魏俊吉,等. 线栓法建立大鼠局灶性脑缺血模型的改进[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2011,8(5):248-252. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2011.05.006.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
郑仕平,韩为,储浩然,等. 通督调神针灸预处理对脑缺血再灌注大鼠相关微小RNA调控机制的研究[J]. 针刺研究,2015,40(2):99-103. DOI:10.13702/j.1000-0607.2015.02.003.
|
[22] |
彭静,陈曦. "补肾通督,醒脑益智"法电针治疗血管性痴呆80例[J]. 中国针灸,2022,42(6):623-624. DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20210413-0005.
|
[23] |
刘燕,王陈妮,兰崴,等. 通督调神针刺对脑缺血再灌注损伤大鼠神经功能及VEGF、NGF、MBP表达的影响[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志,2022,28(2):218-223. DOI:10.19945/j.cnki.issn.1006-3250.2022.02.020.
|
[24] |
谷诗浓,刘毓佳,王振杰,等. 基于细胞自噬探讨通督调神针法对缺血再灌注大鼠神经功能及Beclin-1蛋白表达的影响[J]. 针灸临床杂志,2020,36(10):64-68.
|
[25] |
黄亚光,杨松柏,杜利鹏,等. 电针预处理通过调控皮层区自噬改善大鼠脑缺血再灌注损伤[J]. 针刺研究,2019,44(12):867-872. DOI:10.13702/j.1000-0607.190307.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
李杰,马跃文,康楠,等. 体外放散式冲击波促进脑梗死大鼠海马区神经干细胞增殖并抑制miR-124的表达[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2021,25(31):4981-4987.
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
张利达,韩为,高志波,等. "通督调神"法针刺联合颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄:随机对照研究[J]. 中国针灸,2022,42(2):121-125. DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20210202-k0007.
|
[41] |
罗佛赐,韩为,张利达,等. 通督调神针刺联合西药对短暂性脑缺血发作合并高尿酸血症患者颈动脉斑块的影响[J]. 上海针灸杂志,2021,40(7):789-794. DOI:10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2021.07.0789.
|
[1] | BAI Haiwei, MI Xiaokun, LIU Qingrui, ZHU Lin, WANG Yingnan, LIU Junyan, HAN Ying. Predictive Value of Serum Uric Acid in Perioperative Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(36): 4545-4551. |
[2] | LUO Weigang, YIN Yuanyuan, LIU Wanhu, XU Yuzhu, CAO Xiaoyun, BU Wei, ZHANG Lingyan, REN Huiling. Correlation of Triglyceride Glucose Index with Early Neurological Deterioration in Patients with Single Subcortical Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4419-4424. |
[3] | QIN Fengyin, ZHANG Qishan, LAI Jinjia, HUANG Yimin, HAN Guoyin, SUN Xinglan, WANG Fen, TAN Yibing. Current Status and Influencing Factors of the Intention to Screen for High-risk Stroke among Community Residents in Guangdong [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4283-4289. |
[4] | SU Kaiqi, LYU Zhuan, WU Mingli, LUO Meng, GAO Jing, NIE Chenchen, LIU Hao, FENG Xiaodong. Effect of Electroacupuncture on BDNF/TrkB/PI3K/Akt Pathway and Hippocampal Neuronal Protection in Rats with Learning and Memory Impairment after Ischemia Reperfusion [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4187-4193. |
[5] | YIN Miaomiao, CUI Liling, LI Yaqing, WANG Liqun, ZHANG Yue, WU Jialing. Effect of Dual Task on Walking Ability in Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke Patients with Vestibular Symptoms [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4207-4212. |
[6] | JIAN Qiufeng, XU Ronghua, YAO Qian, ZHOU Yuanyuan. A Meta-analysis of the Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Chinese Elderly Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4070-4079. |
[7] | YANG Yuxuan, ZHANG Han, DU Juan, WANG Lingling, XIE Yulei, YIN Kaiming, ZHANG Bo. Value of an Dynamic Eye-tracking Task in Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect after Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4020-4025. |
[8] | ZHU Lin, GUO Yankui, GAO Chen, CHEN Xuezhi, WANG Fashuai. Efficacy of Western Medicine, Chinese Patent Medicine and Their Combination on Post-stroke Insomnia: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(30): 3823-3832. |
[9] | XIAO Yuqian, BAI Yanjie, WANG Yan, CHEN Shuying, CHEN Limin, SUN Kexin, WAN Jun. Research Progress of Mitochondrial Transfer in Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(30): 3833-3840. |
[10] | LIU Yue, LIU Qi, DONG Hui, LIU Yaling. Neuropsychological Changes of Cognitive Reverters after Stroke Based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) with a Double Threshold [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3417-3422. |
[11] | CHEN Xi, LUO Jianyu, KUANG Zaoyuan, XU Qin. Effect of Paeonol on Improving Behavioral Dysfunction in a Mouse Model of Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3441-3449. |
[12] | ZHENG Siting, HE Chunyu, ZHOU Jun, KONG Ye, YANG Xinyao, ZHOU Haiying, WEI Xiaofei. Summary of Best Evidence for Self-Management of Patients with Motor Dysfunction after Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3230-3237. |
[13] | Expert group of expert consensus on the application of ulinastatin in common clinical critical illness. Expert Consensus on the Application of Ulinastatin in Common Clinical Critical Illness [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3207-3219. |
[14] | WANG Xiaowen, XIAO Tongling, WANG Yi, YANG Ying, XIA Xiaoshuang, LI Xin. Relationship between Homocysteine Level and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3290-3296. |
[15] | DU Yuying, WANG Cailing, CUI Senlin, LEI lei, WANG Yanping, SONG Xueqin, HAN Shuqin, ZHANG Yanmei, WANG Baolan, HUANG Haixia, CHEN Mi, YAN Huirong, LI Dong, ZHANG Jingjing, REN Yu. Analysis of Appropriate Technology Promotion for Stroke Rehabilitation in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(25): 3178-3184. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||