Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12): 1472-1478.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0803
Special Issue: 女性健康最新文章合集; 肥胖最新文章合集
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-10-05
Revised:
2022-12-26
Published:
2023-04-20
Online:
2022-12-29
Contact:
HU Jingyun
通讯作者:
胡静芸
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0803
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 身高(cm) |
---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 13 | 20.2±0.4 | 160.9±1.1 |
HIIT干预组 | 17 | 19.2±1.1 | 163.8±1.0 |
t值 | 3.366 | -1.959 | |
P值 | 0.057 | 0.060 |
Table 1 Comparison of the average age and height between two groups
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 身高(cm) |
---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 13 | 20.2±0.4 | 160.9±1.1 |
HIIT干预组 | 17 | 19.2±1.1 | 163.8±1.0 |
t值 | 3.366 | -1.959 | |
P值 | 0.057 | 0.060 |
组别 | 例数 | 体质量(kg) | BMI(kg/m2) | BF% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 13 | 58.3±1.2 | 59.8±1.2a | 22.1±0.3 | 23.2±0.5a | 33.93±0.72 | 35.55±0.56a |
HIIT干预组 | 17 | 58.6±1.0 | 57.6±1.1a | 21.9±0.3 | 21.0±0.4ab | 33.52±0.62 | 28.34±0.49ab |
F值 | F交互=21.348,F时间=0.673,F组间=0.407 | F交互=11.249,F时间=0.076,F组间=7.533 | F交互=46.558,F时间=12.819,F组间=30.014 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.001,P时间=0.419,P组间=0.529 | P交互=0.002,P时间=0.784,P组间=0.010 | P交互<0.001,P时间=0.001,P组间<0.001 | ||||
组别 | VFA(cm2) | VFL | 腰围(cm) | ||||
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 104.36±4.22 | 93.28±3.56a | 9.92±0.42 | 8.85±0.37a | 81.63±1.10 | 80.16±0.94 | |
HIIT干预组 | 95.07±3.69 | 66.40±3.12ab | 8.94±0.37 | 6.18±0.32ab | 79.31±0.96 | 75.59±0.82ab | |
F值 | F交互=15.575,F时间=79.592,F组间=14.893 | F交互=16.330,F时间=84.601,F组间=14.319 | F交互=3.107,F时间=16.582,F组间=8.270 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间=0.001 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间=0.001 | P交互=0.089,P时间<0.001,P组间=0.008 |
Table 2 Comparison of the average body weight,BMI,body fat percentage,visceral fat area,visceral fat level,and waist circumference between two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 体质量(kg) | BMI(kg/m2) | BF% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 13 | 58.3±1.2 | 59.8±1.2a | 22.1±0.3 | 23.2±0.5a | 33.93±0.72 | 35.55±0.56a |
HIIT干预组 | 17 | 58.6±1.0 | 57.6±1.1a | 21.9±0.3 | 21.0±0.4ab | 33.52±0.62 | 28.34±0.49ab |
F值 | F交互=21.348,F时间=0.673,F组间=0.407 | F交互=11.249,F时间=0.076,F组间=7.533 | F交互=46.558,F时间=12.819,F组间=30.014 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.001,P时间=0.419,P组间=0.529 | P交互=0.002,P时间=0.784,P组间=0.010 | P交互<0.001,P时间=0.001,P组间<0.001 | ||||
组别 | VFA(cm2) | VFL | 腰围(cm) | ||||
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 104.36±4.22 | 93.28±3.56a | 9.92±0.42 | 8.85±0.37a | 81.63±1.10 | 80.16±0.94 | |
HIIT干预组 | 95.07±3.69 | 66.40±3.12ab | 8.94±0.37 | 6.18±0.32ab | 79.31±0.96 | 75.59±0.82ab | |
F值 | F交互=15.575,F时间=79.592,F组间=14.893 | F交互=16.330,F时间=84.601,F组间=14.319 | F交互=3.107,F时间=16.582,F组间=8.270 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间=0.001 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间=0.001 | P交互=0.089,P时间<0.001,P组间=0.008 |
组别 | 例数 | TC/HDL | LDL/HDL | TG/HDL | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 13 | 6.52±0.42 | 6.89±0.28 | 4.36±0.29 | 4.66±0.19 | 2.51±0.19 | 2.75±0.12 |
HIIT干预组 | 17 | 6.29±0.37 | 3.36±0.25ab | 4.12±0.25 | 1.93±0.17b | 2.33±0.16 | 1.08±0.10ab |
F值 | F交互=81.708,F时间=49.284,F组间=18.129 | F交互=90.098,F时间=51.426,F组间=25.342 | F交互=70.763,F时间=32.466,F组间=23.667 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间=<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间<0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of the average levels of four blood lipids between two groups before and after intervention before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | TC/HDL | LDL/HDL | TG/HDL | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 13 | 6.52±0.42 | 6.89±0.28 | 4.36±0.29 | 4.66±0.19 | 2.51±0.19 | 2.75±0.12 |
HIIT干预组 | 17 | 6.29±0.37 | 3.36±0.25ab | 4.12±0.25 | 1.93±0.17b | 2.33±0.16 | 1.08±0.10ab |
F值 | F交互=81.708,F时间=49.284,F组间=18.129 | F交互=90.098,F时间=51.426,F组间=25.342 | F交互=70.763,F时间=32.466,F组间=23.667 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间=<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间<0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | AGEs | 空腹血糖(mmol/L) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 13 | 1.71±0.07 | 1.59±0.06 | 6.22±0.22 | 6.71±0.22a |
HIIT干预组 | 17 | 1.82±0.05 | 1.11±0.05ab | 6.11±0.20 | 5.08±0.19ab |
F值 | F交互=47.929,F时间=17.840,F组间=33.995 | F交互=33.614,F时间=4.412,F组间=10.952 | |||
P值 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P时间=0.045,P组间=0.003 |
Table 4 Comparison of the average levels of AGEs and fasting blood glucose between two groups before and after intervention
组别 | 例数 | AGEs | 空腹血糖(mmol/L) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 13 | 1.71±0.07 | 1.59±0.06 | 6.22±0.22 | 6.71±0.22a |
HIIT干预组 | 17 | 1.82±0.05 | 1.11±0.05ab | 6.11±0.20 | 5.08±0.19ab |
F值 | F交互=47.929,F时间=17.840,F组间=33.995 | F交互=33.614,F时间=4.412,F组间=10.952 | |||
P值 | P交互<0.001,P时间<0.001,P组间<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P时间=0.045,P组间=0.003 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
中国心血管病风险评估和管理指南编写联合委员会. 中国心血管病风险评估和管理指南[J]. 中华预防医学杂志,2019,53(1):13-35. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.01.004.
|
[21] |
心脑血管病风险评估[EB/OL].[2022-08-01].
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[1] | ZHANG Di, LI Hongpeng, MA Jiang, NIE Qian, SUN Jianfeng, WU Zhipeng, ZHANG Hongcai, ZHAO Jue. Effect of Ocular Acupuncture and Exercise Combination Therapy on Postoperative Heart Rate Variability and Prognosis of Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(36): 4535-4544. |
[2] | YU Xinyan, ZHAO Jun, ZHAO Xiaoye, JIANG Qingru, CHEN Yatian, WANG Yan, ZHANG Haicheng. Application of Mobile Smart Healthcare in the Prevention and Control of Cardiovascular Diseases in Elderly Patients with Chronic Diseases in Primary Care [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4167-4172. |
[3] | MA Liyuan, WANG Zengwu, FAN Jing, HU Shengshou. Interpretation of Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2022 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 3975-3994. |
[4] | HE Jingyi, WANG Fang, SHUI Xiaoling, LI Ling, LIANG Qian. Efficacy of Non-pharmacological Interventions to Improve Perimenopausal Insomnia Symptoms: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(31): 3963-3974. |
[5] | QU Hui, LI Huan, TANG Ruohan, DU Yuzheng, ZHAO Qi. Outcome Indicators Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome in the Past Decade [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(30): 3734-3739. |
[6] | PAN Yaojia, WANG Weiqiang, YI Weizhuo, GAO Bing, FU Fanglin, HAN Zheng, SUN Meng, DONG Yaqin, GU Huaicong. Relationship between Triglyceride-glucose Index and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in Middle-aged Obese Residents of Different Genders [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3628-3635. |
[7] | WANG Qianqian, WANG Xiaohang, ZHOU Xiaoying, QIU Shanhu, SUN Zilin. Exercise is the Foundation of Weight Loss [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(28): 3471-3476. |
[8] | HE Rong, ZHANG Li, LI Peng, ZHANG Xiaoling, ZHANG Guo, ZANG Yiran, WU Shouling, SUN Lixia. Immediate Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Arterial Stiffness in a Male Population with Different Blood Glucose Levels [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 2997-3004. |
[9] | LIU Jian, ZHANG Tianyi, AILIZHATI ·Aizezi, CHANG Ruijing, ZHANG Jianli, WANG Wan, JIANG Peng. Cardiopulmonary Physiology Effects of Wearing a Surgical Mask Versus an N95 Respirator in Patients with COPD during Walking: a Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 3028-3032. |
[10] | XUE Shan, LI Laiyou, LIANG Junli, JIN Yinghui, WEI Shuyan. The Efficacy and Safety of Home Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2540-2547. |
[11] | ZHOU Min, ZHENG Ziguang, YOU Hongyu, GUO Miao, YU Wei, YANG Xu. Effects of Reducing Indoor Air Particles on Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiological Indexes in the Elderly: a Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(17): 2114-2119. |
[12] | CHEN Ruimin, LIU Fang, TAN Hong, HAN Shufang, CHEN Yingjian, SU Congcong. Effects of Dapagliflozin on the Expression of MicroRNA-423-5p and Cardiac Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Heart Failure [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(14): 1733-1738. |
[13] | YUE Bocheng, HOU Qiqi, HAN Quanle, YANG Bo, WU Zheng, WU Jianmei, CHEN Shuohua, WU Shouling, LI Kangbo. Effect of Atrial Fibrillation on the Risk of New-onset Myocardial Infarction in Hypertensive Population [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(14): 1739-1744. |
[14] | PENG Siyang, LI Shaohong, TIAN Yukun, MENG Linghao, FANG Ruiying, ZHU Wenzeng. Current Status of the Selection of Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(11): 1340-1347. |
[15] | LI Lingling, HUANG Hailiang, YU Ying, JIA Yuqi, LIU Zhiyao, SHI Xin, WANG Fangqi, LIU Xinyue. Effect of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(11): 1389-1397. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||