Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (08): 963-971.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0714
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-08-29
Revised:
2022-11-26
Published:
2023-03-15
Online:
2022-12-29
Contact:
WANG Chong
通讯作者:
王翀
作者简介:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0714
Figure 2 A 57-year-old man with L4/5 brucellosis spondylitis underwent UBE decompression,debridement,interbody fusion,combined with percutaneous screw fixation
时点 | 腰背部VAS(分) | 腿部VAS(分) | JOA评分(分) | ODI(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
术前 | 5.85±1.28 | 3.69±2.02 | 13.46±3.18 | 55.57±10.99 |
术后次日 | 3.15±0.80a | 1.92±1.19a | — | — |
术后1个月 | 1.92±0.64a | 1.31±0.75a | 20.85±2.91a | 37.09±9.99a |
术后3个月 | 1.38±0.51a | 1.08±0.64a | 24.92±1.55a | 26.54±6.96a |
术后6个月 | 0.85±0.80a | 0.69±0.48a | 25.92±1.04a | 10.71±2.89a |
术后1年 | 0.38±0.51a | 0.31±0.48a | 27.08±0.95a | 6.14±3.38a |
F值 | 27.616 | 6.669 | 107.727 | 113.225 |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1 The VAS scores of low back and leg,JOA score,and ODI were compared between preoperative and postoperative
时点 | 腰背部VAS(分) | 腿部VAS(分) | JOA评分(分) | ODI(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
术前 | 5.85±1.28 | 3.69±2.02 | 13.46±3.18 | 55.57±10.99 |
术后次日 | 3.15±0.80a | 1.92±1.19a | — | — |
术后1个月 | 1.92±0.64a | 1.31±0.75a | 20.85±2.91a | 37.09±9.99a |
术后3个月 | 1.38±0.51a | 1.08±0.64a | 24.92±1.55a | 26.54±6.96a |
术后6个月 | 0.85±0.80a | 0.69±0.48a | 25.92±1.04a | 10.71±2.89a |
术后1年 | 0.38±0.51a | 0.31±0.48a | 27.08±0.95a | 6.14±3.38a |
F值 | 27.616 | 6.669 | 107.727 | 113.225 |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
时点 | ESR(mm/1 h) | CRP(mg/L) |
---|---|---|
术前 | 38.69±18.98 | 24.51±12.98 |
出院前 | 36.23±11.39 | 29.56±14.32 |
术后1个月 | 24.85±9.17 | 13.72±6.03 |
术后3个月 | 8.77±3.72a | 5.45±1.84a |
术后6个月 | 8.46±2.73a | 5.13±1.75a |
术后1年 | 5.92±2.81a | 4.25±1.91a |
F值 | 15.862 | 19.723 |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Compared of ESR and CRP between preoperative and postoperative
时点 | ESR(mm/1 h) | CRP(mg/L) |
---|---|---|
术前 | 38.69±18.98 | 24.51±12.98 |
出院前 | 36.23±11.39 | 29.56±14.32 |
术后1个月 | 24.85±9.17 | 13.72±6.03 |
术后3个月 | 8.77±3.72a | 5.45±1.84a |
术后6个月 | 8.46±2.73a | 5.13±1.75a |
术后1年 | 5.92±2.81a | 4.25±1.91a |
F值 | 15.862 | 19.723 |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
田大胜,朱斌,刘建军,等. 单边双通道内镜技术治疗脱出游离型腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(12):1083-1087.
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
国家卫生健康委员会. 布鲁氏菌病诊断:WS 269—2019[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
孙兵,车晓明. 视觉模拟评分法(VAS)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2012(6):645.
|
[20] |
孙兵,车晓明. 日本骨科协会评估治疗(JOA评分)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2019(9):969.
|
[21] |
许斌,王与荣,赵建宁,等. ODI在腰椎间盘突出症手术疗效评价中的应用[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2004,25(1):31-34. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2004.01.011.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
杨利斌,杨素敏. 一期前后联合入路治疗腰椎布鲁杆菌性脊柱炎的效果[J]. 中国医药导报,2015,12(12):97-101.
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
田大胜,刘建军,朱斌,等. 单边双通道内镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症和腰椎椎管狭窄症[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2020(17):1155-1164.
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
买尔旦·买买提,白凤周,木拉德·买尔旦,等. 单侧与双侧后路开窗、病灶清除、植骨融合术治疗腰骶椎布鲁杆菌性脊柱炎[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2021,41(20):1459-1466. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20190203-00046.
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[1] | ZHANG Yisheng, TANG Fubo, SUN Yaru, ZHONG Yuanming, LI Zhifei. Clinical Efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Tranforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Height Adjustable Titanium Fusion Cage in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4464-4471. |
[2] | MIAO Guangxin,GAO Jian,ZHANG Kexin,WANG Lina,LIU Jinxia. Human brucellosis in Chengde District from 2010 to 2018:clinical analysis of 340 cases [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(20): 2536-2540. |
[3] | LI Lin,XU Wenti,SU Cheng,ZHANG Ying. Reasons for Delay in Visit and Initial Diagnosis of Brucellosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(32): 3921-3925. |
[4] | LUO Zhun,WANG Wen,CUI Wei. Brucellosis with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury:a Case Report [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(21): 2638-2641. |
[5] | ZHONG Yuan-ming1*,ZHANG Yi-sheng2,LIANG Zi-yang2,LI Jia-lang2,CHEN Zhen2. Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Extreme Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2018, 21(15): 1813-1817. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||