Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (32): 4065-4071.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0418
• Article·Focus on Special Population·Adolescents • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-02-20
Revised:
2022-07-18
Published:
2022-11-15
Online:
2022-08-25
Contact:
WANG Liancheng
About author:
通讯作者:
王连成
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0418
组别 | 例数 | 主弯Cobb角 | CBD(mm) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 20.11°±0.94° | 16.69°±1.34° | 2.088 | 0.044 | 5.31±2.70 | 4.81±3.81 | 0.107 | 0.915 |
结合组 | 20 | 18.58°±0.69° | 12.05°±1.30°a | 4.434 | <0.001 | 8.74±2.88 | 7.53±3.23 | 0.281 | 0.781 |
线下组 | 20 | 18.12°±0.95° | 14.91°±1.21°b | 2.077 | 0.045 | 7.93±2.52 | 6.94±3.03 | 0.250 | 0.804 |
F值 | 1.399 | 3.520 | 0.425 | 0.177 | |||||
P值 | 0.255 | 0.036 | 0.656 | 0.838 |
Table 1 Comparison of coronal indices among three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 主弯Cobb角 | CBD(mm) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 20.11°±0.94° | 16.69°±1.34° | 2.088 | 0.044 | 5.31±2.70 | 4.81±3.81 | 0.107 | 0.915 |
结合组 | 20 | 18.58°±0.69° | 12.05°±1.30°a | 4.434 | <0.001 | 8.74±2.88 | 7.53±3.23 | 0.281 | 0.781 |
线下组 | 20 | 18.12°±0.95° | 14.91°±1.21°b | 2.077 | 0.045 | 7.93±2.52 | 6.94±3.03 | 0.250 | 0.804 |
F值 | 1.399 | 3.520 | 0.425 | 0.177 | |||||
P值 | 0.255 | 0.036 | 0.656 | 0.838 |
组别 | 例数 | TK | LL | SVA(mm) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 23.67°±3.21° | 32.14°±2.63° | -2.045 | 0.049 | 49.89°±2.11° | 45.77°±3.59° | 0.993 | 0.328 | 25.54°±6.43° | 15.17°±4.73° | 5.512 | <0.001 |
结合组 | 20 | 22.78°±2.50° | 30.69°±2.37° | -2.294 | 0.027 | 52.75°±2.48° | 52.27°±2.80° | 0.128 | 0.899 | 27.48°±6.20° | 16.15°±7.90° | 5.043 | <0.001 |
线下组 | 20 | 24.44°±3.22° | 33.81°±13.68° | -2.109 | 0.042 | 53.86°±2.42° | 50.04°±2.93° | 1.004 | 0.322 | 25.82°±5.90° | 12.00°±5.97° | 7.369 | <0.001 |
F值 | 0.080 | 0.343 | 0.714 | 1.106 | 0.560 | 2.296 | |||||||
P值 | 0.923 | 0.711 | 0.494 | 0.338 | 0.574 | 0.110 |
Table 2 Comparison of sagittal plane indices among three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | TK | LL | SVA(mm) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 23.67°±3.21° | 32.14°±2.63° | -2.045 | 0.049 | 49.89°±2.11° | 45.77°±3.59° | 0.993 | 0.328 | 25.54°±6.43° | 15.17°±4.73° | 5.512 | <0.001 |
结合组 | 20 | 22.78°±2.50° | 30.69°±2.37° | -2.294 | 0.027 | 52.75°±2.48° | 52.27°±2.80° | 0.128 | 0.899 | 27.48°±6.20° | 16.15°±7.90° | 5.043 | <0.001 |
线下组 | 20 | 24.44°±3.22° | 33.81°±13.68° | -2.109 | 0.042 | 53.86°±2.42° | 50.04°±2.93° | 1.004 | 0.322 | 25.82°±5.90° | 12.00°±5.97° | 7.369 | <0.001 |
F值 | 0.080 | 0.343 | 0.714 | 1.106 | 0.560 | 2.296 | |||||||
P值 | 0.923 | 0.711 | 0.494 | 0.338 | 0.574 | 0.110 |
组别 | 例数 | ATR | Raimondi值 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 7.94°±0.37° | 4.94°±0.26° | 6.566 | <0.001 | 16.44°±1.54° | 10.33°±0.48° | 2.967 | 0.007 |
结合组 | 20 | 7.65°±0.24° | 3.85°±0.22°a | 11.555 | <0.001 | 13.90°±1.17° | 8.20°±0.84° | 3.941 | <0.001 |
线下组 | 20 | 7.80°±0.26° | 5.55°±1.90°b | 8.621 | <0.001 | 15.70°±1.61° | 11.30°±1.50° | 2.407 | 0.021 |
F值 | 0.249 | 7.224 | 0.852 | 1.537 | |||||
P值 | 0.780 | 0.002 | 0.432 | 0.224 |
Table 3 Comparison of horizontal indices among three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | ATR | Raimondi值 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 7.94°±0.37° | 4.94°±0.26° | 6.566 | <0.001 | 16.44°±1.54° | 10.33°±0.48° | 2.967 | 0.007 |
结合组 | 20 | 7.65°±0.24° | 3.85°±0.22°a | 11.555 | <0.001 | 13.90°±1.17° | 8.20°±0.84° | 3.941 | <0.001 |
线下组 | 20 | 7.80°±0.26° | 5.55°±1.90°b | 8.621 | <0.001 | 15.70°±1.61° | 11.30°±1.50° | 2.407 | 0.021 |
F值 | 0.249 | 7.224 | 0.852 | 1.537 | |||||
P值 | 0.780 | 0.002 | 0.432 | 0.224 |
组别 | 例数 | PI | PT | SS | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 42.53°±2.43° | 38.91°±9.39° | 1.101 | 0.279 | 5.13°±1.42° | 7.70°±6.15° | -0.677 | 0.503 | 37.40°±2.07° | 30.59°±2.14° | 2.284 | 0.029 |
结合组 | 20 | 39.43°±10.33° | 38.20°±7.95° | 0.515 | 0.610 | 2.37°±1.85° | 6.15°±2.04° | -1.375 | 0.177 | 37.36°±1.24° | 31.53°±1.93° | 2.097 | 0.043 |
线下组 | 20 | 45.68°±10.17° | 44.39°±10.92° | 0.387 | 0.701 | 5.65°±1.75° | 10.23°±2.13° | -1.664 | 0.104 | 40.03°±1.51° | 34.15°±1.55° | 2.718 | 0.010 |
F值 | 2.261 | 2.513 | 1.101 | 2.096 | 0.921 | 0.889 | |||||||
P值 | 0.114 | 0.090 | 0.340 | 0.113 | 0.404 | 0.417 |
Table 4 Comparison of pelvic parameters among three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | PI | PT | SS | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 42.53°±2.43° | 38.91°±9.39° | 1.101 | 0.279 | 5.13°±1.42° | 7.70°±6.15° | -0.677 | 0.503 | 37.40°±2.07° | 30.59°±2.14° | 2.284 | 0.029 |
结合组 | 20 | 39.43°±10.33° | 38.20°±7.95° | 0.515 | 0.610 | 2.37°±1.85° | 6.15°±2.04° | -1.375 | 0.177 | 37.36°±1.24° | 31.53°±1.93° | 2.097 | 0.043 |
线下组 | 20 | 45.68°±10.17° | 44.39°±10.92° | 0.387 | 0.701 | 5.65°±1.75° | 10.23°±2.13° | -1.664 | 0.104 | 40.03°±1.51° | 34.15°±1.55° | 2.718 | 0.010 |
F值 | 2.261 | 2.513 | 1.101 | 2.096 | 0.921 | 0.889 | |||||||
P值 | 0.114 | 0.090 | 0.340 | 0.113 | 0.404 | 0.417 |
组别 | 例数 | 凸侧MAR | 凹侧MAR | 双侧RMSR(100%MVIC) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 6.08±0.46 | 6.48±0.37 | -0.680 | 0.501 | 4.77±0.55 | 6.20±0.43 | -2.047 | 0.048 | 1.37±0.12 | 1.08±0.08 | 2.069 | 0.046 |
结合组 | 20 | 6.42±0.74 | 6.98±0.57 | -0.595 | 0.555 | 3.99±0.47 | 7.87±0.46a | -3.611 | 0.001 | 1.50±0.12 | 1.11±0.06 | 2.826 | 0.007 |
线下组 | 20 | 5.59±0.40 | 6.06±0.34 | -0.891 | 0.378 | 4.38±0.28 | 7.50±0.35a | -2.510 | 0.016 | 1.37±0.12 | 1.05±0.07 | 2.348 | 0.024 |
F值 | 0.582 | 1.119 | 0.777 | 4.354 | 0.376 | 0.185 | |||||||
P值 | 0.562 | 0.334 | 0.465 | 0.018 | 0.688 | 0.831 |
Table 5 Comparison of electromyographic indices of paravertebral muscle surface of parietal vertebra between three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 凸侧MAR | 凹侧MAR | 双侧RMSR(100%MVIC) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 6.08±0.46 | 6.48±0.37 | -0.680 | 0.501 | 4.77±0.55 | 6.20±0.43 | -2.047 | 0.048 | 1.37±0.12 | 1.08±0.08 | 2.069 | 0.046 |
结合组 | 20 | 6.42±0.74 | 6.98±0.57 | -0.595 | 0.555 | 3.99±0.47 | 7.87±0.46a | -3.611 | 0.001 | 1.50±0.12 | 1.11±0.06 | 2.826 | 0.007 |
线下组 | 20 | 5.59±0.40 | 6.06±0.34 | -0.891 | 0.378 | 4.38±0.28 | 7.50±0.35a | -2.510 | 0.016 | 1.37±0.12 | 1.05±0.07 | 2.348 | 0.024 |
F值 | 0.582 | 1.119 | 0.777 | 4.354 | 0.376 | 0.185 | |||||||
P值 | 0.562 | 0.334 | 0.465 | 0.018 | 0.688 | 0.831 |
组别 | 例数 | 功能活动 | 疼痛 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 22.67±0.42 | 22.94±0.34 | -0.515 | 0.610 | 22.94±0.25 | 23.11±0.27 | -.457 | 0.651 |
结合组 | 20 | 22.05±0.29 | 22.15±0.33 | -0.224 | 0.824 | 23.15±0.2 | 23.35±0.24 | -0.556 | 0.581 |
线下组 | 20 | 22.25±0.47 | 22.85±2.13 | -1.085 | 0.285 | 23.10±0.27 | 23.20±0.27 | -0.263 | 0.794 |
F值 | 0.598 | 1.837 | 0.161 | 0.215 | |||||
P值 | 0.553 | 0.169 | 0.852 | 0.807 | |||||
组别 | 自我形象 | 心理健康 | 治疗满意度 | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 19.94±0.46 | 21.50±0.47 | -2.373 | 0.023 | 21.00±0.28 | 22.50±0.32 | -3.554 | 0.001 | 7.28±1.02 |
结合组 | 19.45±0.32 | 21.10±0.23 | -4.196 | 0.000 | 20.60±0.44 | 22.15±0.29 | -2.944 | 0.006 | 8.05±1.10a |
线下组 | 20.50±0.44 | 21.75±0.39a | -2.115 | 0.041 | 21.70±0.29 | 23.00±0.25 | -3.380 | 0.002 | 6.90±0.97b |
F值 | 1.697 | 0.820 | 2.639 | 2.305 | 6.459 | ||||
P值 | 0.193 | 0.446 | 0.080 | 0.109 | 0.003 |
Table 6 Comparison of SRS-22 scores among three groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 功能活动 | 疼痛 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 18 | 22.67±0.42 | 22.94±0.34 | -0.515 | 0.610 | 22.94±0.25 | 23.11±0.27 | -.457 | 0.651 |
结合组 | 20 | 22.05±0.29 | 22.15±0.33 | -0.224 | 0.824 | 23.15±0.2 | 23.35±0.24 | -0.556 | 0.581 |
线下组 | 20 | 22.25±0.47 | 22.85±2.13 | -1.085 | 0.285 | 23.10±0.27 | 23.20±0.27 | -0.263 | 0.794 |
F值 | 0.598 | 1.837 | 0.161 | 0.215 | |||||
P值 | 0.553 | 0.169 | 0.852 | 0.807 | |||||
组别 | 自我形象 | 心理健康 | 治疗满意度 | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
线上组 | 19.94±0.46 | 21.50±0.47 | -2.373 | 0.023 | 21.00±0.28 | 22.50±0.32 | -3.554 | 0.001 | 7.28±1.02 |
结合组 | 19.45±0.32 | 21.10±0.23 | -4.196 | 0.000 | 20.60±0.44 | 22.15±0.29 | -2.944 | 0.006 | 8.05±1.10a |
线下组 | 20.50±0.44 | 21.75±0.39a | -2.115 | 0.041 | 21.70±0.29 | 23.00±0.25 | -3.380 | 0.002 | 6.90±0.97b |
F值 | 1.697 | 0.820 | 2.639 | 2.305 | 6.459 | ||||
P值 | 0.193 | 0.446 | 0.080 | 0.109 | 0.003 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
邱勇. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸基因学研究和临床治疗的发展现状及前景[J]. 中华外科杂志,2018,56(8):578-582. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.08.005.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
方积乾,陆盈. 现代医学统计学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
陈峰,沈建雄,邱贵兴. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸骨盆参数与脊柱矢状面参数的相关性[J]. 中华医学杂志,2013,93(7):487-490. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2013.07.003.
|
[16] |
杜青,周璇,励建安,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸腰腹部肌群表面肌电信号特征研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2013,35(8):612-616. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2013.08.005.
|
[17] |
袁望舒,陈丽霞,沈建雄,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者顶椎椎旁肌表面肌电信号与Cobb角及轴向躯干旋转角的相关性[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2019,23(24):3824-3828. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1223.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
胡攀攀,于淼,刘晓光,等. Lenke 1型青少年特发性脊柱侧弯脊柱-骨盆矢状位与冠状位参数的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版),2015,47(2):248-252. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.02.011.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
吴亮,邱勇,王斌,等. 脊柱侧凸椎旁肌肌纤维不对称性分布的研究[J].脊柱外科杂志,2004,2(5):276-279. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2004.05.007.
|
[24] |
贾惊宇,孙英伟,张立军. 特发性脊柱侧凸患者两侧椎旁肌横截面积的CT测量[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(3):208-211. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2009.03.08.
|
[1] | ZHANG Shuai, LI Qin, LI Dongfeng, XIAO Jinping, LI Yunpeng. A Prospective Cohort Study of Solid Fuels Use and Risk of Hypertension in Chinese Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4001-4006. |
[2] | GAO Jing, ZHOU Shangcheng, GAO Sande, ZOU Guanyang, CHEN Yingyao. Health-related Quality of Life and Its Influencing Factors in Patients with Prevention of Disease in Traditionnal Chinese Medicine based on EQ-5D-5L Scale [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4043-4050. |
[3] | HU Jingyi, HONG Jing, GUO Xiaodong, ZHANG Xiaohong, MO Ning, ZHOU Xiaocui, YU Qin, ZHOU Minhua, SUN Yan, NI Liu, SHI Xiaoli, SU Xiaoqing, LI Yuqian. Efficacy of Community-involved Hospice Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(28): 3573-3584. |
[4] | SUN Xiaolei, LEI Xiaolong, LIN Jiasheng, LI Keliang, GUO Ao, ZHANG Xiaohui. Effect of High Intensity Laser Combined with Physiotherapy Scoliosis Specific Exercise Therapy on Ultrasound Morphology of Multifidus Muscles in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with Low Back Pain [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3456-3462. |
[5] | YUAN Mingpei, LIN Yaowang, BEI Weijie, LIU Huadong, DONG Shaohong, SUN Xin. Feasibility of Retrograde Recanalization of Occluded Radial Artery via Distal Transradial Artery Approach: a Single-center Prospective Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3373-3377. |
[6] | ZHANG Xingshan, LIN Yue, WAN Chonghua, SONG Aifeng, PAN Haiyan. A Nephrotic Syndrome-specific Quality of Life Scale: Development Based on the Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases, and Verification Using the Classical Test Theory [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2488-2495. |
[7] | XUE Shan, LI Laiyou, LIANG Junli, JIN Yinghui, WEI Shuyan. The Efficacy and Safety of Home Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2540-2547. |
[8] | LI Peiwen, HE Jiahui, MA Ximin, QIAO Hui. Health-related Quality of Life Measured Using the EQ-5D-3L and Health Service Utilization in Rural Residents of Ningxia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(19): 2361-2368. |
[9] | WU Xiaoyu, WAN Chonghua, CHEN Ying, RUAN Yanqin, WENG Yijie, XU Xiaojiang. A Review of Studies on Patient-reported Outcomes and Disease-specific Health-related Quality of Life Instruments for Irritable Bowel Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2268-2276. |
[10] | ZHANG Li, ZHANG Jianjiang, DOU Wenjie, ZENG Huiqin, WANG Qin. Intestinal Flora in Children with Henoch-Schönlein Purpura Nephritis: Composition and Abundance Analysis and Clinical Significance [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2250-2255. |
[11] | XU Mingzhu, LIN Run, WEN Huaneng, WANG Yixiao, LIU Lu, WANG Bihan, CHEN Kexun, XUAN Chunyu, CUI Shaoyang. Effect of Jin's Three Needles Therapy Combined with Mirror Therapy on Lower Limb Dysfunction with Cerebral Infarction Patients: Analysis Based on Surface Electromyography [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(17): 2162-2168. |
[12] | ZHENG Qingyong, ZHAO Liang, WEI Wei, REN Xuejun, WANG Chao, SUN Rui, CONG Minghua, YU Lei, YANG Min. Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction Can Improve Psychological Condition in Breast Cancer Patients: an Overview of Systematic Reviews [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1503-1512. |
[13] | DONG Linrui, CHANG Qingqing, MA Jianjun, LIU Chuanze, GUO Dashuai, LI Xiaohuan, FAN Yongyan, LI Dongsheng. Correlation between Autonomic Dysfunction and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Parkinson's Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1450-1455,1471. |
[14] | MIAO Xueyi, DING Lingyu, LU Jinling, HU Jieman, ZHU Hanfei, CHEN Li, XU Xinyi, XU Qin. Preoperative Frailty and Postoperative Adverse Outcomes among Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(08): 980-988. |
[15] | HUA Hongxia, LIANG Hui, XU Xinyi, XU Qin, SONG Yating, YANG Ningli. Maladaptive Eating Behavior after Bariatric Surgery: a Conceptual Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(07): 783-789. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||