Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (03): 356-366.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0544
• Evidence-based Medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-04-06
Revised:
2022-08-12
Published:
2023-01-20
Online:
2022-09-30
Contact:
LIU Annuo
About author:
通讯作者:
刘安诺
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0544
第一作者 | 发表时间(年) | 国家/地区 | 中心数量 | 研究类型 | 样本量(例) | 诊断标准 | 影响因素 | NOS评分(分) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病例组 | 对照组 | ||||||||
ABELE-HORN[ | 1998 | 德国 | 3 | 队列研究 | 48 | 49 | a | ①⑬⑭⑮⑰(21) | 9 |
MARSHALL[ | 1999 | 美国 | 13 | 队列研究 | 224 | 641 | b | ⑧⑭⑮ | 9 |
PI-YING[ | 2005 | 中国 | 8 | 队列研究 | 538 | 1 225 | b | ⑦⑧⑱(21) | 8 |
TAPIA[ | 2006 | 南美 | 16 | 队列研究 | 446 | 1 379 | b | ⑭⑮⑱⑲(21) | 8 |
HENDERSON-SMART[ | 2006 | 澳大利亚+新西兰 | 25 | 队列研究 | 2 710 | 8 743 | b | ⑨ | 8 |
GUIMARÃES[ | 2010 | 葡萄牙 | 5 | 队列研究 | 33 | 223 | c | ⑧⑰⑳(21) | 7 |
FARSTAD[ | 2011 | 挪威 | 全国 | 队列研究 | 324 | 53 | c | ⑬⑭⑱ | 8 |
GORTNER[ | 2011 | 欧洲 | 10国 | 队列研究 | 677 | 3 508 | b | ③⑨⑩⑪ | 8 |
GAGLIARDI[ | 2011 | 意大利 | 14 | 队列研究 | 196 | 1 064 | c | ⑨⑩⑯(21) | 9 |
ROJAS[ | 2012 | 哥伦比亚 | 8 | 病例对照研究 | 64 | 148 | c | ②⑮⑱(21) | 7 |
YEN[ | 2013 | 中国 | 21 | 队列研究 | 2 006 | 3 747 | b | ④⑦⑧⑨⑰⑱(21) | 9 |
KLINGER[ | 2013 | 以色列 | 28 | 队列研究 | 1 663 | 10 476 | b | ③⑨⑩⑫ | 8 |
TOLIA[ | 2014 | 美国 | 200 | 队列研究 | 3 011 | 3 199 | b | ⑦⑩⑮ | 9 |
LAPCHAROENSAP[ | 2015 | 美国 | 116 | 队列研究 | 7 081 | 7 971 | b | ②③⑤⑨⑪ | 7 |
ROCHA[ | 2019 | 葡萄牙 | 11 | 队列研究 | 119 | 375 | c | ④⑤⑮ | 8 |
VALENZUELA-STUTMAN[ | 2019 | 智利 | 15 | 队列研究 | 2 580 | 13 827 | d | ⑥⑨⑫⑭⑯⑰⑱⑲(21) | 7 |
JUNG[ | 2019 | 韩国 | 69 | 队列研究 | 1 906 | 2 756 | c | ⑨⑰ | 9 |
EUISEOK[ | 2019 | 韩国 | 64 | 队列研究 | 816 | 618 | c | ⑨⑬⑱⑳(21) | 9 |
江苏省新生儿重症监护病房母乳质量改进临床研究协作组[ | 2019 | 中国 | 19 | 病例对照研究 | 191 | 577 | c | ⑮⑰(21) | 8 |
SHIN[ | 2020 | 韩国 | KNN | 队列研究 | 764 | 1 603 | c | ①⑦⑨⑩⑰⑱ | 9 |
NAKASHIMA[ | 2021 | 日本 | 218 | 队列研究 | 7 792 | 9 334 | c | ①⑩⑱ | 8 |
FALEH[ | 2021 | 瑞士 | 9 | 队列研究 | 138 | 1 087 | c | ⑭⑱ | 8 |
LI[ | 2021 | 中国 | 33 | 队列研究 | 181 | 446 | b | ⑥⑨⑫⑯ | 7 |
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the included literature and the quality evaluation outcomes
第一作者 | 发表时间(年) | 国家/地区 | 中心数量 | 研究类型 | 样本量(例) | 诊断标准 | 影响因素 | NOS评分(分) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病例组 | 对照组 | ||||||||
ABELE-HORN[ | 1998 | 德国 | 3 | 队列研究 | 48 | 49 | a | ①⑬⑭⑮⑰(21) | 9 |
MARSHALL[ | 1999 | 美国 | 13 | 队列研究 | 224 | 641 | b | ⑧⑭⑮ | 9 |
PI-YING[ | 2005 | 中国 | 8 | 队列研究 | 538 | 1 225 | b | ⑦⑧⑱(21) | 8 |
TAPIA[ | 2006 | 南美 | 16 | 队列研究 | 446 | 1 379 | b | ⑭⑮⑱⑲(21) | 8 |
HENDERSON-SMART[ | 2006 | 澳大利亚+新西兰 | 25 | 队列研究 | 2 710 | 8 743 | b | ⑨ | 8 |
GUIMARÃES[ | 2010 | 葡萄牙 | 5 | 队列研究 | 33 | 223 | c | ⑧⑰⑳(21) | 7 |
FARSTAD[ | 2011 | 挪威 | 全国 | 队列研究 | 324 | 53 | c | ⑬⑭⑱ | 8 |
GORTNER[ | 2011 | 欧洲 | 10国 | 队列研究 | 677 | 3 508 | b | ③⑨⑩⑪ | 8 |
GAGLIARDI[ | 2011 | 意大利 | 14 | 队列研究 | 196 | 1 064 | c | ⑨⑩⑯(21) | 9 |
ROJAS[ | 2012 | 哥伦比亚 | 8 | 病例对照研究 | 64 | 148 | c | ②⑮⑱(21) | 7 |
YEN[ | 2013 | 中国 | 21 | 队列研究 | 2 006 | 3 747 | b | ④⑦⑧⑨⑰⑱(21) | 9 |
KLINGER[ | 2013 | 以色列 | 28 | 队列研究 | 1 663 | 10 476 | b | ③⑨⑩⑫ | 8 |
TOLIA[ | 2014 | 美国 | 200 | 队列研究 | 3 011 | 3 199 | b | ⑦⑩⑮ | 9 |
LAPCHAROENSAP[ | 2015 | 美国 | 116 | 队列研究 | 7 081 | 7 971 | b | ②③⑤⑨⑪ | 7 |
ROCHA[ | 2019 | 葡萄牙 | 11 | 队列研究 | 119 | 375 | c | ④⑤⑮ | 8 |
VALENZUELA-STUTMAN[ | 2019 | 智利 | 15 | 队列研究 | 2 580 | 13 827 | d | ⑥⑨⑫⑭⑯⑰⑱⑲(21) | 7 |
JUNG[ | 2019 | 韩国 | 69 | 队列研究 | 1 906 | 2 756 | c | ⑨⑰ | 9 |
EUISEOK[ | 2019 | 韩国 | 64 | 队列研究 | 816 | 618 | c | ⑨⑬⑱⑳(21) | 9 |
江苏省新生儿重症监护病房母乳质量改进临床研究协作组[ | 2019 | 中国 | 19 | 病例对照研究 | 191 | 577 | c | ⑮⑰(21) | 8 |
SHIN[ | 2020 | 韩国 | KNN | 队列研究 | 764 | 1 603 | c | ①⑦⑨⑩⑰⑱ | 9 |
NAKASHIMA[ | 2021 | 日本 | 218 | 队列研究 | 7 792 | 9 334 | c | ①⑩⑱ | 8 |
FALEH[ | 2021 | 瑞士 | 9 | 队列研究 | 138 | 1 087 | c | ⑭⑱ | 8 |
LI[ | 2021 | 中国 | 33 | 队列研究 | 181 | 446 | b | ⑥⑨⑫⑯ | 7 |
影响因素 | 敏感性分析前 | 敏感性分析后 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR值 | 95%CI | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI | P值 | |
母亲合并绒毛膜羊膜炎 | 1.46 | (1.18,1.80) | 0.000 6 | 1.34 | (1.11,1.62) | 0.000 2 |
母亲合并妊娠期高血压 | 1.26 | (1.15,1.37) | <0.000 01 | 1.23 | (1.14,1.33) | <0.000 01 |
母亲合并胎膜早破 | 1.18 | (1.10,1.26) | <0.000 01 | 1.18 | (1.10,1.26) | <0.000 01 |
母亲产前使用类固醇 | 2.38 | (0.15,37.76) | 0.54 | 2.38 | (0.15,37.76) | 0.53 |
母亲合并子痫前期 | 1.74 | (0.31,9.82) | 0.53 | 1.74 | (0.31,9.82) | 0.53 |
母亲合并妊娠期糖尿病 | 1.50 | (0.35,6.44) | 0.58 | 0.80 | (0.23,2.75) | 0.72 |
早产儿出生体质量 | 0.79 | (0.76,0.83) | <0.000 01 | 0.79 | (0.76,0.83) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿胎龄 | 0.80 | (0.73,0.87) | <0.000 01 | 0.77 | (0.71,0.85) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿SGA | 2.64 | (1.85,3.77) | <0.000 01 | 2.46 | (1.74,3.47) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿产房气管插管 | 2.50 | (1.39,4.50) | 0.002 | 2.50 | (1.39,4.51) | 0.002 |
早产儿5 min Apgar评分<7分 | 2.47 | (1.36,4.47) | 0.003 | 2.47 | (1.36,4.47) | 0.003 |
男性早产儿 | 1.49 | (1.43,1.55) | <0.000 01 | 1.49 | (1.43,1.55) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿机械通气 | 1.59 | (1.28,1.96) | <0.000 1 | 1.39 | (1.14,1.71) | <0.000 1 |
早产儿机械通气>7 d | 7.99 | (4.47,14.29) | <0.000 01 | 6.55 | (3.63,11.80) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿肺表面活性物质 | 3.46 | (1.96,6.11) | <0.000 1 | 3.46 | (1.96,6.11) | <0.000 1 |
早产儿使用类固醇 | 2.42 | (1.93,3.03) | <0.000 01 | 2.51 | (1.86,3.40) | <0.000 1 |
早产儿RDS | 3.40 | (2.01,5.75) | <0.000 01 | 3.23 | (1.93,5.41) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿PDA | 1.96 | (1.38,2.79) | 0.000 2 | 1.96 | (1.38,2.80) | 0.000 2 |
早产儿败血症 | 1.82 | (1.36,2.44) | <0.000 1 | 1.74 | (1.30,2.34) | <0.000 1 |
早产儿NEC | 1.62 | (1.18,2.22) | 0.003 | 1.62 | (1.18,2.22) | 0.003 |
早产儿ROP | 1.83 | (0.80,4.14) | 0.15 | 1.83 | (0.80,4.14) | 0.15 |
Table 2 Sensitivity analysis results
影响因素 | 敏感性分析前 | 敏感性分析后 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR值 | 95%CI | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI | P值 | |
母亲合并绒毛膜羊膜炎 | 1.46 | (1.18,1.80) | 0.000 6 | 1.34 | (1.11,1.62) | 0.000 2 |
母亲合并妊娠期高血压 | 1.26 | (1.15,1.37) | <0.000 01 | 1.23 | (1.14,1.33) | <0.000 01 |
母亲合并胎膜早破 | 1.18 | (1.10,1.26) | <0.000 01 | 1.18 | (1.10,1.26) | <0.000 01 |
母亲产前使用类固醇 | 2.38 | (0.15,37.76) | 0.54 | 2.38 | (0.15,37.76) | 0.53 |
母亲合并子痫前期 | 1.74 | (0.31,9.82) | 0.53 | 1.74 | (0.31,9.82) | 0.53 |
母亲合并妊娠期糖尿病 | 1.50 | (0.35,6.44) | 0.58 | 0.80 | (0.23,2.75) | 0.72 |
早产儿出生体质量 | 0.79 | (0.76,0.83) | <0.000 01 | 0.79 | (0.76,0.83) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿胎龄 | 0.80 | (0.73,0.87) | <0.000 01 | 0.77 | (0.71,0.85) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿SGA | 2.64 | (1.85,3.77) | <0.000 01 | 2.46 | (1.74,3.47) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿产房气管插管 | 2.50 | (1.39,4.50) | 0.002 | 2.50 | (1.39,4.51) | 0.002 |
早产儿5 min Apgar评分<7分 | 2.47 | (1.36,4.47) | 0.003 | 2.47 | (1.36,4.47) | 0.003 |
男性早产儿 | 1.49 | (1.43,1.55) | <0.000 01 | 1.49 | (1.43,1.55) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿机械通气 | 1.59 | (1.28,1.96) | <0.000 1 | 1.39 | (1.14,1.71) | <0.000 1 |
早产儿机械通气>7 d | 7.99 | (4.47,14.29) | <0.000 01 | 6.55 | (3.63,11.80) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿肺表面活性物质 | 3.46 | (1.96,6.11) | <0.000 1 | 3.46 | (1.96,6.11) | <0.000 1 |
早产儿使用类固醇 | 2.42 | (1.93,3.03) | <0.000 01 | 2.51 | (1.86,3.40) | <0.000 1 |
早产儿RDS | 3.40 | (2.01,5.75) | <0.000 01 | 3.23 | (1.93,5.41) | <0.000 01 |
早产儿PDA | 1.96 | (1.38,2.79) | 0.000 2 | 1.96 | (1.38,2.80) | 0.000 2 |
早产儿败血症 | 1.82 | (1.36,2.44) | <0.000 1 | 1.74 | (1.30,2.34) | <0.000 1 |
早产儿NEC | 1.62 | (1.18,2.22) | 0.003 | 1.62 | (1.18,2.22) | 0.003 |
早产儿ROP | 1.83 | (0.80,4.14) | 0.15 | 1.83 | (0.80,4.14) | 0.15 |
[1] |
World health organization:preterm birth[EB/OL]. (2018-02-19) [2021-12-01].
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
江苏省新生儿重症监护病房母乳质量改进临床研究协作组. 多中心回顾性分析极低及超低出生体重儿支气管肺发育不良的临床特点及高危因素[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2019,57(1):33-39. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.01.009.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
原晋芳,韩彤妍. 绒毛膜羊膜炎与早产儿肺部疾病研究进展[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2019,34(10):794-796. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2019.10.018.
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[1] | ZHANG Aili, HOU Qiqi, HAN Quanle, ZHANG Boheng, ZHANG Jiawei, CAO Hongxia, ZHANG Chao, CHEN Shuohua, WU Shouling, LI Kangbo. Correlation between Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of New-onset Chronic Kidney Disease in Northern Chinese Population [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(36): 4521-4526. |
[2] | TANG Can, LI Xiangyang, LI Jing, QIN Haoran, ZHU Hong. The Value of Nomogram Established by Serological Indicators and Tumor Diameter to Predict the Risk of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(36): 4514-4520. |
[3] | LU Yihan, WANG Jiwen, SUN Yue, FENG Runrun, HAN Yufei, SONG Zhenzhen, SUN Ying, DAI Huihua, CHEN Xing. Risk Factors and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Pregnant Women with Total Labor over 24 Hours [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4459-4463. |
[4] | CHENG Hao, ZHOU Jinchi, LIU Xi, KANG Lin, FAN Ahui, DOU Weijia, LIU Zhenxiong. Risk Factors Analysis and Risk Prediction Model Establishment for Rebleeding Events within 3 Years after Endoscopic Treatment of Gastroesophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4446-4452. |
[5] | XIE Xuemei, GAO Jing, BAI Dingxi, LU Xianying, HE Jiali, LI Yue. Current Status of Polypharmacy in the Elderly and Its Influencing Factors: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4394-4403. |
[6] | WANG Yue, CHEN Qing, LIU Lurong. Detection Rate of Depression and Its Influencing Factors in Chinese Elderly: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4329-4335. |
[7] | WANG Zhe, DONG Zhihao, ZHENG Hao, KONG Wencheng, ZHANG Yukuan, ZHANG Qiuyue, HAN Jing. Construction of Optimized Treatment Plan of Acupuncture for Migraine Based on Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Method [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4336-4342. |
[8] | LIU Weina, GE Haiyan, MA Jing, CAO Qinying, BAI Xingyu, CUI Shifang, QIAO Yanxia. A Study on the Relationship of Vitamin A and E Levels in Umbilical Cord Blood with Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4152-4158. |
[9] | LI Jixin, QIU Linjie, REN Yan, WANG Wenru, LI Meijie, ZHANG Jin. The Correlation of Dietary Inflammatory Index with Overweight, Obesity and Abdominal Obesity: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4089-4097. |
[10] | MA Liyuan, WANG Zengwu, FAN Jing, HU Shengshou. Interpretation of Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2022 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 3975-3994. |
[11] | JIA Yu, ZHOU Zitong, CAO Xuehua, HU Wanqin, XIANG Feng, XIONG Langyu, WANG Xiaoxia. Incidence of Perimenopausal Syndrome in Chinese Women Aged 40 to 65 Years: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4080-4088. |
[12] | ZHANG Shuai, LI Qin, LI Dongfeng, XIAO Jinping, LI Yunpeng. A Prospective Cohort Study of Solid Fuels Use and Risk of Hypertension in Chinese Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4001-4006. |
[13] | JIAN Qiufeng, XU Ronghua, YAO Qian, ZHOU Yuanyuan. A Meta-analysis of the Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Chinese Elderly Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4070-4079. |
[14] | LI Yujing, JIN Yichao, CHEN Xing, JI Mengying, DAI Huihua. Risk Factors for Endometrial Lesions Detected by Hysteroscopy in Breast Cancer Patients Taking Tamoxifen [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4026-4030. |
[15] | HE Jingyi, WANG Fang, SHUI Xiaoling, LI Ling, LIANG Qian. Efficacy of Non-pharmacological Interventions to Improve Perimenopausal Insomnia Symptoms: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(31): 3963-3974. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||