Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (30): 3775-3782.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0319
Special Issue: 全民健康最新文章合集
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-03-10
Revised:
2022-05-30
Published:
2022-10-20
Online:
2022-06-17
Contact:
Shumei ZHUANG
About author:
通讯作者:
庄淑梅
作者简介:
基金资助:
项目 | 国内常模组(n=1 388) | 新型毒品成瘾组(n=196) | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
SCL-90总分 | 129.96±38.76 | 206.62±26.66 | 40.26 | <0.001 |
躯体化 | 1.37±0.48 | 2.49±0.34 | 45.68 | <0.001 |
强迫症状 | 1.62±0.58 | 2.38±0.48 | 22.24 | <0.001 |
人际关系敏感 | 1.65±0.51 | 2.28±0.51 | 17.31 | <0.001 |
抑郁 | 1.50±0.59 | 2.46±0.46 | 29.05 | <0.001 |
焦虑 | 1.39±0.43 | 2.69±0.36 | 50.06 | <0.001 |
敌对 | 1.48±0.56 | 1.90±0.40 | 14.90 | <0.001 |
恐怖 | 1.23±0.41 | 1.85±0.38 | 22.94 | <0.001 |
偏执 | 1.43±0.57 | 2.06±0.40 | 22.40 | <0.001 |
精神病性 | 1.29±0.42 | 1.96±0.30 | 31.11 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Comparison of SCL-90 scores between people addicted to new synthetic drugs and domestic norm
项目 | 国内常模组(n=1 388) | 新型毒品成瘾组(n=196) | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
SCL-90总分 | 129.96±38.76 | 206.62±26.66 | 40.26 | <0.001 |
躯体化 | 1.37±0.48 | 2.49±0.34 | 45.68 | <0.001 |
强迫症状 | 1.62±0.58 | 2.38±0.48 | 22.24 | <0.001 |
人际关系敏感 | 1.65±0.51 | 2.28±0.51 | 17.31 | <0.001 |
抑郁 | 1.50±0.59 | 2.46±0.46 | 29.05 | <0.001 |
焦虑 | 1.39±0.43 | 2.69±0.36 | 50.06 | <0.001 |
敌对 | 1.48±0.56 | 1.90±0.40 | 14.90 | <0.001 |
恐怖 | 1.23±0.41 | 1.85±0.38 | 22.94 | <0.001 |
偏执 | 1.43±0.57 | 2.06±0.40 | 22.40 | <0.001 |
精神病性 | 1.29±0.42 | 1.96±0.30 | 31.11 | <0.001 |
影响因素 | rs值 | P值 |
---|---|---|
性别 | -0.058 | 0.419 |
年龄 | -0.285 | <0.001 |
BMI | -0.116 | 0.104 |
受教育程度 | 0.078 | 0.274 |
婚姻状况 | -0.088 | 0.221 |
职业 | 0.072 | 0.314 |
经济收入 | 0.210 | 0.003 |
吸烟史 | 0.103 | 0.152 |
饮酒史 | -0.022 | 0.764 |
毒品种类 | 0.046 | 0.526 |
吸毒时长 | -0.100 | 0.163 |
每日吸毒量 | 0.375 | <0.001 |
戒毒次数 | 0.075 | 0.296 |
人格P | 0.915 | <0.001 |
人格E | 0.748 | <0.001 |
人格N | 0.549 | <0.001 |
人格L | 0.979 | <0.001 |
积极应对 | -0.749 | <0.001 |
消极应对 | 0.754 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Correlation analysis of mental health status with its influencing factors in people addicted to new synthetic drugs
影响因素 | rs值 | P值 |
---|---|---|
性别 | -0.058 | 0.419 |
年龄 | -0.285 | <0.001 |
BMI | -0.116 | 0.104 |
受教育程度 | 0.078 | 0.274 |
婚姻状况 | -0.088 | 0.221 |
职业 | 0.072 | 0.314 |
经济收入 | 0.210 | 0.003 |
吸烟史 | 0.103 | 0.152 |
饮酒史 | -0.022 | 0.764 |
毒品种类 | 0.046 | 0.526 |
吸毒时长 | -0.100 | 0.163 |
每日吸毒量 | 0.375 | <0.001 |
戒毒次数 | 0.075 | 0.296 |
人格P | 0.915 | <0.001 |
人格E | 0.748 | <0.001 |
人格N | 0.549 | <0.001 |
人格L | 0.979 | <0.001 |
积极应对 | -0.749 | <0.001 |
消极应对 | 0.754 | <0.001 |
条目 | 积极应对 | 消极应对 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
rs值 | P值 | rs值 | P值 | |
人格P | -0.713 | P<0.001 | 0.750 | P<0.001 |
人格E | -0.738 | P<0.001 | 0.286 | P<0.001 |
人格N | -0.272 | P<0.001 | 0.612 | P<0.001 |
人格L | -0.707 | P<0.001 | 0.684 | P<0.001 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of personality traitswith coping styles in people addicted to new synthetic drugs
条目 | 积极应对 | 消极应对 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
rs值 | P值 | rs值 | P值 | |
人格P | -0.713 | P<0.001 | 0.750 | P<0.001 |
人格E | -0.738 | P<0.001 | 0.286 | P<0.001 |
人格N | -0.272 | P<0.001 | 0.612 | P<0.001 |
人格L | -0.707 | P<0.001 | 0.684 | P<0.001 |
路径 | 直接效应 | 95%CI | 间接效应 | 95%CI | 总效应 | 中介效应占比(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
人格P-消极应对-总分 | 0.14a | (0.08,0.19) | 0.07a | (0.03,0.13) | 0.21 | 33.3 |
人格N-总分 | 0.09a | (0.06,0.12) | 0 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 |
人格E-消极应对-总分 | 0.14a | (0.09,0.20) | -0.11a | (-0.09,-0.13) | 0.03 | 78.6b |
人格E-积极应对-总分 | 0.14a | (0.09,0.20) | 0.02a | (0.01,0.05) | 0.16 | 12.5 |
人格L-消极应对-总分 | 0.51a | (0.44,0.60) | 0.14a | (0.07,0.27) | 0.65 | 21.5 |
人格L-积极应对-总分 | 0.51a | (0.44,0.60) | 0.04a | (0.02,0.07) | 0.55 | 7.3 |
消极应对-经济收入-总分 | 0.15a | (0.11,0.21) | -0.01 | (-0.02,0.00) | 0.14 | 6.7b |
积极应对-经济收入-总分 | -0.08a | (-0.11,-0.05) | 0.01 | (0.00,0.03) | -0.07 | 12.5b |
经济收入-总分 | 0.03 | (-0.02,0.06) | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 |
Table 4 Analysis of direct effect,indirect effect and total effect of possibleinfluencing factors on mental health status in people addicted to new synthetic drugs
路径 | 直接效应 | 95%CI | 间接效应 | 95%CI | 总效应 | 中介效应占比(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
人格P-消极应对-总分 | 0.14a | (0.08,0.19) | 0.07a | (0.03,0.13) | 0.21 | 33.3 |
人格N-总分 | 0.09a | (0.06,0.12) | 0 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 |
人格E-消极应对-总分 | 0.14a | (0.09,0.20) | -0.11a | (-0.09,-0.13) | 0.03 | 78.6b |
人格E-积极应对-总分 | 0.14a | (0.09,0.20) | 0.02a | (0.01,0.05) | 0.16 | 12.5 |
人格L-消极应对-总分 | 0.51a | (0.44,0.60) | 0.14a | (0.07,0.27) | 0.65 | 21.5 |
人格L-积极应对-总分 | 0.51a | (0.44,0.60) | 0.04a | (0.02,0.07) | 0.55 | 7.3 |
消极应对-经济收入-总分 | 0.15a | (0.11,0.21) | -0.01 | (-0.02,0.00) | 0.14 | 6.7b |
积极应对-经济收入-总分 | -0.08a | (-0.11,-0.05) | 0.01 | (0.00,0.03) | -0.07 | 12.5b |
经济收入-总分 | 0.03 | (-0.02,0.06) | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 |
[1] |
The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report 2018[S/OL]. (2018-07-01)[2021-03-08].
|
[2] |
中华人民共和国公安部. 2018年中国毒品形势报告[S/OL]. (2019-06-18)[2021-03-08].
|
[3] |
国家食品药品监督管理总局. 国家药物滥用监测年度报告(2016年)[EB/OL]. (2017-03-27)[2021-03-08].
|
[4] |
杨皓,朱长才,熊峰,等. 新型毒品与传统毒品吸食人员回归社会影响因素对比分析[J]. 中国健康教育,2017,33(5):392-394,402. DOI:10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2017.05.002.
|
[5] |
陈骋,陈剑珩,沈洁,等. 传统毒品向新型毒品滥用转变的现状及原因分析[J]. 中国药物滥用防治杂志,2017,23(3):143-145,151. DOI:10.15900/j.cnki.zylf1995.2017.03.005.
|
[6] |
张迪然,丁昌权,江文明,等. 贵阳市新型合成毒品滥用现况及滥用人群心理健康状况分析[J]. 中国药物依赖性杂志,2017,26(2):135-140. DOI:10.13936/j.cnki.cjdd1992.2017.02.011.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
徐猛,李艳峰,霍艳. 国内新型合成毒品滥用者心理测量与临床诊治的文献回顾[J]. 中国药物依赖性杂志,2016,25(6):500-504. DOI:10.13936/j.cnki.cjdd1992.2016.06.003.
|
[9] | |
[10] |
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders fifth edition[M]. Arlington VA:American Psychiatric Association,2013.
|
[11] |
陈树林,李凌江. SCL-90信度效度检验和常模的再比较[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志,2003,29(5):323-327. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0152.2003.05.002.
|
[12] |
熊燕,彭萍,彭瑜. CCSMHS和SCL-90在大学新生中的应用比较研究[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志,2009,17(5):579-581. DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2009.05.032.
|
[13] |
陈仲庚.艾森克人格问卷的项目分析[J]. 心理学报,1983,15(2):211-218.
|
[14] |
钱铭怡,武国城,朱荣春,等. 艾森克人格问卷简式量表中国版(EPQ-RSC)的修订[J]. 心理学报,2000,32(3):317-323.
|
[15] | |
[16] |
汪向东,王希林,马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册[M]. 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:108-109.
|
[17] |
徐智华,蒋萍萍. 肿瘤科护士的心理状况及其简易应对方式的调查[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊),2016(7):19-21.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
金华,吴文源,张明园. 中国正常人SCL-90评定结果的初步分析[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志,1986,12(5):260-263.
|
[22] |
陈燕玲,朱洁英,卢小明,等. 新型毒品滥用者的心理健康状态探讨与护理干预[J]. 中国药物滥用防治杂志,2018,24(4):197-199. DOI:10.15900/j.cnki.zylf1995.2018.04.003.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] | |
[26] |
焦玲艳,张华伟,陈景武. 医科大学生的心理健康状况和个性特征分析[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志,2007,15(3):231-234. DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2007.03.016.
|
[27] |
王玮,任桂秋,肇恒伟,等. 苯丙胺类兴奋剂滥用者心理健康状况及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国药物依赖性杂志,2013,22(2):131-134. DOI:10.13936/j.cnki.cjdd1992.2013.02.014.
|
[28] |
惠慧,洪昂,周爽伊,等. 童年期情感虐待对强迫症患者强迫症状的影响:神经质人格与应激感受的链式中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2022,30(1):51-55. DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2022.01.010.
|
[29] |
黄先伟,周祎,何成森. 初中生人格特征、心理健康状况与学业情绪间关系研究[J]. 赤峰学院学报(自然科学版),2015,31(5):118-119. DOI:10.13398/j.cnki.issn1673-260x.2015.05.049.
|
[30] |
苑杰,史晓妹,姜伟时,等. 临床医学研究生抑郁与人格特征、应对方式的关系[J]. 预防医学,2019,31(12):1263-1266. DOI:10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2019.12.018.
|
[31] |
沈宁达,王霞,吴正君,等. 未成年男性戒毒人员吸毒原因及人格社会支持自尊分析[J]. 云南警官学院学报,2018(4):28-32.
|
[32] |
唐浩,李晨. 甲基苯丙胺成瘾者人格特质及其对心理渴求的影响[J]. 中国预防医学杂志,2019,20(10):897-902. DOI:10.16506/j.1009-6639.2019.10.003.
|
[33] |
吕玥,李彦章. 戒毒青少年心理复原力与人格、抑郁的关系[J]. 成都医学院学报,2019,14(6):810-813. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-2257.2019.06.027.
|
[34] |
张宇朋,李洁璇,吴波,等. 新型毒品与海洛因滥用者MMPI结果分析[J]. 中国药物滥用防治杂志,2015,21(6):325-328. DOI:10.15900/j.cnki.zylf1995.2015.06.004.
|
[35] |
沈可,黄笛,刘晴,等. 中国医学生心理健康状况与人格特征相关性研究的元分析[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志,2017,9(9):1029-1033. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2017.09.02.
|
[36] |
黄慧,贾艳滨,苏瑞兴. 家庭情感功能、应对方式与戒毒康复人员心理健康的关系研究[J]. 中国药物依赖性杂志,2020,29(1):36-40. DOI:10.13936/j.cnki.cjdd1992.2020.01.007.
|
[37] |
刘晓滨,张诗茗,李东俊,等. 对海洛因依赖者心理健康与应对方式的研究[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生,2007,7(5):348-351. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2007.05.006.
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
王媛,刘春兰. 社会支持及应对方式在护士人格特征与心理健康间的中介作用[J]. 中华护理教育,2019,16(7):536-540. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2019.07.015.
|
[40] | |
[41] |
|
[42] |
宗玲,周利民,宗伟,等.成年男性暴力犯罪人员的人格特征及与社会支持、应对方式的相关性分析[J]. 中国当代医药,2022,29(6):35-37. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2022.06.010.
|
[43] |
彭婉蓉,储珺,郑凯莉,等. 应激感受与老年抑郁:主观经济地位的调节与心理弹性的中介[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2021,29(5):1069-1073. DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2021.05.036.
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[1] | YANG Lu, ZONG Zhanhong, YI Yingying. Current Status and Influencing Factors of Depression among Rural Middle-aged and Elderly Women in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(25): 3091-3095. |
[2] | WEI Lan, HUANG Yue, SONG Yanan, HOU Lihong, WANG Yani, PAN Dongchen, FEI Xiaolu. Investigation on Platform for Evaluation Management and Consultation Services of Polypharmacy among Older Patients Needs of Healthcare Professionals [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(25): 3157-3162. |
[3] | WEI Lan, HUANG Yue, SONG Yanan, HOU Lihong, WANG Yani, PAN Dongchen, FEI Xiaolu. Investigation on Platform for Evaluation Management and Consultation Services of Polypharmacy among Older Patients Needs of General Population [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(25): 3163-3169. |
[4] | LIU Rui, DENG Jing, CHEN Ailing, CHENG Peihua, LUO Xingneng, HU Yongjiao, ZHANG Munan. Influence of Policy Factors on Healthcare-seeking Behaviors in Patients with Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(19): 2385-2394. |
[5] | ZHANG Guanbai, ZHENG Ling, YANG Liping, ZHOU Qin, WANG Fei, HE Liangze, CHENG Xuan, CHA Li, LI Xinyue. Co-prevalence of Substance Use Disorders and Common AxisⅠDisorders in Yunnan's Drug Users [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(36): 4554-4560. |
[6] | YI Huijie, LI Jianxiang, ZHANG Chi, XU Liyue, DONG Xiaosong, HAN Fang. Effect of Depressive Symptoms on the Adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Using a Path Analysis-based Approach [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(33): 4179-4184. |
[7] | WU Xiaoran, WANG Xiaoyue, GENG Yibo, ZHANG Hongxing, ZHANG Haisan. Spontaneous Brain Activities in Hyperthyroidism Patients Assessed Using Fractional Amplitude of Low-frequency Fluctuation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(33): 4173-4178. |
[8] | Yaoxia LI, Qiaohong YANG, Weiyu QIU, Hongyu YU, Xianzhen HUANG, Qiqi KE. Disease Coping Styles in Young and Middle-aged Patients with First Acute Myocardial Infarction: a Qualitative Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(24): 2992-2997. |
[9] | LIU Lei,LIU Huaping,GUO Hong,SUN Zhe,ZHONG Lili,LI Xiaoxue. Reliability,Validity and Applicability of the Chinese Version of the Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale for the Elderly [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(5): 619-624. |
[10] | WEI Xiaofei,QIN Xianjing,PENG Rong,FENG Jun,FENG Qiming. Efficiency of Mental Health Services Delivery in Township Hospitals of Guangxi Based on Data Envelopment Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(4): 421-426. |
[11] | WANG Yongxin,LI Xiaoju,JING Mingxia,ZHANG Mei,LIANG Rujiang. Path Analysis of Influencing Factors for Medication Compliance in Community-dwelling Elderly Patients with Hypertension [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(4): 503-508. |
[12] | WANG Xixin,CAO Jie,YANG Yanguo,XU Fei,XIA Lei,HU Xiaowen,LIU Huanzhong. A Follow-up Survey on Mental Health Status of COVID-19 Survivors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(26): 3343-3348. |
[13] | ZHANG Zhenxiang,LI Hui,PING Zhiguang,LIU Qingxuan,LIU Feng. Correlation of Mental Health Literacy between Stroke Patients and Their Caregivers [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(22): 2855-2859. |
[14] | ZHANG Zhenxiang,REN Juanjuan,LIN Beilei,PING Zhiguang,WANG Wenna,GUO Yunfei,LUAN Wenyan. Relationship between Mental Health Literacy and Health Behaviors among Elderly Stroke Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(22): 2860-2865. |
[15] | Leon Piterman,Marika Vicziany1,LIN Chuling(translator),HUANG Wenjing(translator),YANG Hui(translator). Counting the Cost of Pandemics:Spanish Flu vs COVID-19 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(13): 1592-1596. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||