Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (30): 3783-3788.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0262
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-12-17
Revised:
2022-04-25
Published:
2022-10-20
Online:
2022-06-16
Contact:
Jun CHEN
About author:
通讯作者:
陈君
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0262
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄( | 病程〔M(P25,P75),月〕 |
---|---|---|---|---|
改良八段锦组 | 30 | 9/21 | 41.1±10.9 | 3.00(2.00,12.00) |
常规康复组 | 30 | 10/20 | 41.3±10.1 | 4.50(1.00,23.25) |
检验统计量值 | 0.077a | 0.049b | -0.178 | |
P值 | 0.781 | 0.961 | 0.859 |
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy patients between two groups
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄( | 病程〔M(P25,P75),月〕 |
---|---|---|---|---|
改良八段锦组 | 30 | 9/21 | 41.1±10.9 | 3.00(2.00,12.00) |
常规康复组 | 30 | 10/20 | 41.3±10.1 | 4.50(1.00,23.25) |
检验统计量值 | 0.077a | 0.049b | -0.178 | |
P值 | 0.781 | 0.961 | 0.859 |
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规康复组 | 30 | 11.63±3.23 | 14.57±2.69a | 15.10±2.78ab | 13.90±2.72ac |
改良八段锦组 | 30 | 10.67±3.65 | 16.37±1.81ad | 17.70±1.64abd | 17.90±1.30abcd |
F值 | F交互=11.862,F时间=109.882,F组间=11.772 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 |
Table 2 Comparison of the Yasuhisa Tanaka 20 Score Scale score between two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规康复组 | 30 | 11.63±3.23 | 14.57±2.69a | 15.10±2.78ab | 13.90±2.72ac |
改良八段锦组 | 30 | 10.67±3.65 | 16.37±1.81ad | 17.70±1.64abd | 17.90±1.30abcd |
F值 | F交互=11.862,F时间=109.882,F组间=11.772 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 |
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规康复组 | 30 | 46.37±9.66 | 43.36±7.43a | 42.34±8.12ab | 44.86±5.72ac |
改良八段锦组 | 30 | 44.72±8.76 | 35.48±7.34ad | 32.54±9.04abd | 29.87±6.63abcd |
F值 | F交互=23.395,F时间=19.131,F组间=21.884 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 |
Table 3 Comparison of the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale scores between two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规康复组 | 30 | 46.37±9.66 | 43.36±7.43a | 42.34±8.12ab | 44.86±5.72ac |
改良八段锦组 | 30 | 44.72±8.76 | 35.48±7.34ad | 32.54±9.04abd | 29.87±6.63abcd |
F值 | F交互=23.395,F时间=19.131,F组间=21.884 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 |
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规康复组 | 30 | 5.33±2.86 | 3.43±2.24a | 2.87±2.18ab | 3.47±2.22ac |
改良八段锦组 | 30 | 5.00±2.59 | 2.27±1.51ad | 1.47±1.17abd | 1.20±1.00abcd |
F值 | F交互=6.722,F时间=45.391,F组间=8.360 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 |
Table 4 Comparison of the Visual Analogue Scale score for neck pain between two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规康复组 | 30 | 5.33±2.86 | 3.43±2.24a | 2.87±2.18ab | 3.47±2.22ac |
改良八段锦组 | 30 | 5.00±2.59 | 2.27±1.51ad | 1.47±1.17abd | 1.20±1.00abcd |
F值 | F交互=6.722,F时间=45.391,F组间=8.360 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 |
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规康复组 | 30 | 107.13±14.19 | 111.29±13.46ad | 114.49±14.69abd | 113.11±15.38abcd |
改良八段锦组 | 30 | 110.88±13.49 | 124.99±12.81a | 129.02±12.36ab | 131.42±10.04ac |
F值 | F交互=9.819,F时间=32.096,F组间=12.396 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 |
Table 5 Comparison of the Chinese version of the SF-36 score between two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规康复组 | 30 | 107.13±14.19 | 111.29±13.46ad | 114.49±14.69abd | 113.11±15.38abcd |
改良八段锦组 | 30 | 110.88±13.49 | 124.99±12.81a | 129.02±12.36ab | 131.42±10.04ac |
F值 | F交互=9.819,F时间=32.096,F组间=12.396 | ||||
P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
戴文康,谢瑞,常晓娟,等. 八段锦治疗神经根型颈椎病的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 天津中医药,2020,37(4):422-428. DOI:10.11656/j.issn.1672-1519.2020.04.16.
|
[3] |
奎瑜,陈秀华,徐振华,等. 陈氏飞针治疗椎动脉型颈椎病伴失眠的临床研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2016,19(21):2553-2556,2561. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.21.012.
|
[4] |
张若冰. 推拿改善颈型颈椎病员工焦虑状态:疼痛缓解的中介作用[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志,2018,24(12):927-931. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2018.12.009.
|
[5] |
李贞晶,瞿昱,孟宪忠. 针刺结合家庭锻炼对神经根型颈椎病患者疼痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 国际中医中药杂志,2019,41(12):1323-1326. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4246.2019.12.010.
|
[6] | |
[7] |
中国颈椎病诊治与康复指南2007年[R]. 北京:中国康复医学会颈椎病专业委员会,2007.
|
[8] |
|
[9] | |
[10] |
袁菊莲,罗伦,赵燕,等. 八段锦锻炼联合常规康复疗法在老年神经根型颈椎病患者康复治疗中的应用[J]. 中医正骨,2019,31(8):25-30,34.
|
[11] |
中华外科杂志编辑部. 颈椎病的分型、诊断及非手术治疗专家共识(2018)[J]. 中华外科杂志,2018,56(6):401-402. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.06.001.
|
[12] |
冯罡. "项八针"联合改良关节松动术对神经根型颈椎病患者颈痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2020,41(4):490-492,495. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2020.04.036.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
杨丽,侯洁,刘新春,等. 情绪反应性量表中文版的信效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2018,26(2):264-267. DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.02.012.
|
[15] |
袁菊莲,代庆凯,段鑫,等. 地震后下肢截肢患者综合康复治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2009,24(8):741-743. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2009.08.017.
|
[16] |
孙志成,顾晓美,欧阳钢,等. 基于虚拟现实的八段锦对养老机构老年骨质疏松症患者跌倒风险及生活质量的影响[J]. 中国医药导报,2020,17(1):90-93,97.
|
[17] |
朱立国,于杰,高景华. 旋转手法治疗神经根型颈椎病研究概述[J]. 中医正骨,2005,17(8):69-70,73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-6015.2005.08.053.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
王小云,章路军,叶羽翀. 神经根型颈椎病神经根性疼痛与炎性因子相关性研究[J]. 福建医药杂志,2019,41(1):13-15.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
黄春兰,陆青梅,黄连欣,等. 颈椎病患者疾病不确定感与焦虑、抑郁相关性调查分析[J]. 中国医药导报,2013,10(9):109-110,113. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7210.2013.09.043.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
李水琴,欧妍. 牵引联合颈椎关节松动术治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2018,40(1):63-65. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2018.01.017.
|
[24] |
於先贵. 综合康复疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病65例[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2007,29(3):162-163. DOI:10.3760/j:issn:0254-1424.2007.03.025.
|
[25] |
江建春. 神经根型颈椎病的中医药治疗研究概况[J]. 中医正骨,2015,27(11):71-74.
|
[26] |
于杰,朱立国,洪毅,等. 中医综合疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效评价与长期随访[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志,2016,24(9):11-13,17.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
何欣蔚. 八段锦对颈型颈椎病患者临床康复疗效的观察[D]. 南京:南京中医药大学,2014.
|
[29] |
张萍,王琰. 中高架势八段锦对溃疡性结肠炎患者焦虑、抑郁及生活质量的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(1):81-85. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.01.018.
|
[30] |
雷聪云,叶秀春,纪伟娟,等. 八段锦对慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期肺肾气虚证患者运动耐力和生活质量的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2020,35(8):992-994. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.08.022.
|
[1] | MENG Jiangtao, YANG Siyu, SUN Lei, LEI Ruining, ZHAO Xiaoxia. Advances in the Prognostic Value of Diffusion Tensor Imaging with Motor Evoked Potential for Motor Function in Cerebral Infarction Patients with Hemiplegia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4098-4102. |
[2] | GAO Jing, ZHOU Shangcheng, GAO Sande, ZOU Guanyang, CHEN Yingyao. Health-related Quality of Life and Its Influencing Factors in Patients with Prevention of Disease in Traditionnal Chinese Medicine based on EQ-5D-5L Scale [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4043-4050. |
[3] | MA Liyuan, WANG Zengwu, FAN Jing, HU Shengshou. Interpretation of Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2022 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 3975-3994. |
[4] | WANG Xiaoran, ZHANG Dan. Influence of Multimorbidity on Anxiety Symptoms among Chinese Elderly People: a Propensity Score-matched Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3622-3627. |
[5] | HU Jingyi, HONG Jing, GUO Xiaodong, ZHANG Xiaohong, MO Ning, ZHOU Xiaocui, YU Qin, ZHOU Minhua, SUN Yan, NI Liu, SHI Xiaoli, SU Xiaoqing, LI Yuqian. Efficacy of Community-involved Hospice Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(28): 3573-3584. |
[6] | TANG Shilan, XIE Kexin, LIU Lingyu, QI Tiantian, YANG Yansui. Advances in Rehabilitation Outcomes and Care in Patients with Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3342-3348. |
[7] | DU Yuying, WANG Cailing, CUI Senlin, LEI lei, WANG Yanping, SONG Xueqin, HAN Shuqin, ZHANG Yanmei, WANG Baolan, HUANG Haixia, CHEN Mi, YAN Huirong, LI Dong, ZHANG Jingjing, REN Yu. Analysis of Appropriate Technology Promotion for Stroke Rehabilitation in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(25): 3178-3184. |
[8] | YIN Cong, DIAO He, SHENG Wei, CAO Yan, BAI Wenpei. Influence of Daily Self-weighing Supported by Online Supervision on Body Composition and Emotions in Overweight/Obese Women with Anxiety and Depression [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 2992-2996. |
[9] | ZHANG Xinyi, XU Muzi, ZHENG Yan, ZHAO Yue. Advances in Health Anxiety and Its Online Cognitive-behavioral Interventions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(23): 2936-2942. |
[10] | WANG Dan, WANG Jianhui, DONG Jianxiu, CHANG Wenhong, QIN Lu, LIU Qi, CHEN Chen. Effect of an Internet-based Intervention on Motor Behavior in Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(21): 2603-2608. |
[11] | XUE Shan, LI Laiyou, LIANG Junli, JIN Yinghui, WEI Shuyan. The Efficacy and Safety of Home Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2540-2547. |
[12] | ZHANG Xingshan, LIN Yue, WAN Chonghua, SONG Aifeng, PAN Haiyan. A Nephrotic Syndrome-specific Quality of Life Scale: Development Based on the Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases, and Verification Using the Classical Test Theory [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2488-2495. |
[13] | GE Anxin, ZHANG Guiqing, JIANG Liang, XING Wenlong, HU Min, LI Haohao, MENG Yao. Epidemiological Survey of the Prevalence and Associated Factors of Mental Disorders in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(19): 2395-2401. |
[14] | LI Peiwen, HE Jiahui, MA Ximin, QIAO Hui. Health-related Quality of Life Measured Using the EQ-5D-3L and Health Service Utilization in Rural Residents of Ningxia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(19): 2361-2368. |
[15] | GUO Tianci, CHEN Jixin, YU Weijie, LIU Aifeng. Recent Developments in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoarthritis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(19): 2428-2433. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||