Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (22): 2746-2752.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0224
Special Issue: 女性健康最新文章合集; 肥胖最新文章合集
• Original Research·Clinical Quality Improvement • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-03-16
Revised:
2022-05-27
Published:
2022-08-05
Online:
2022-06-23
Contact:
Wenpei BAI
About author:
通讯作者:
白文佩
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0224
组别 | 例数 | 年龄( | 营养状况〔n(%)〕 | 受教育程度〔n(%)〕 | 个人月收入〔n(%)〕 | 婚姻情况〔n(%)〕 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
超重 | 肥胖 | 专科及以下 | 本科及以上 | ≤5 000元 | >5 000元 | 未婚 | 已婚 | |||
对照组 | 36 | 35.7±2.1 | 16(44.4) | 20(55.6) | 18(50.0) | 18(50.0) | 8(22.2) | 28(77.8) | 8(22.2) | 28(77.8) |
试验组 | 35 | 35.2±1.2 | 13(37.1) | 22(62.9) | 14(40.0) | 21(60.0) | 10(28.6) | 25(71.4) | 7(20.0) | 28(80.0) |
χ2(t)值 | 0.843a | 0.633 | 0.722 | 0.378 | 0.051 | |||||
P值 | 0.401 | 0.819 | 0.403 | 0.536 | 0.821 |
Table 1 Comparison of general information of overweight and obese female railway workers in two groups
组别 | 例数 | 年龄( | 营养状况〔n(%)〕 | 受教育程度〔n(%)〕 | 个人月收入〔n(%)〕 | 婚姻情况〔n(%)〕 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
超重 | 肥胖 | 专科及以下 | 本科及以上 | ≤5 000元 | >5 000元 | 未婚 | 已婚 | |||
对照组 | 36 | 35.7±2.1 | 16(44.4) | 20(55.6) | 18(50.0) | 18(50.0) | 8(22.2) | 28(77.8) | 8(22.2) | 28(77.8) |
试验组 | 35 | 35.2±1.2 | 13(37.1) | 22(62.9) | 14(40.0) | 21(60.0) | 10(28.6) | 25(71.4) | 7(20.0) | 28(80.0) |
χ2(t)值 | 0.843a | 0.633 | 0.722 | 0.378 | 0.051 | |||||
P值 | 0.401 | 0.819 | 0.403 | 0.536 | 0.821 |
组别 | 例数 | 体质量(kg) | BMI(kg/m2) | 体脂率(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | |||
对照组 | 36 | 73.3±1.7 | 73.0±1.9 | 28.1±1.1 | 28.0±1.0 | 42.2±1.0 | 42.2±1.2 | |
试验组 | 35 | 73.6±2.3 | 68.7±2.3a | 28.0±1.4 | 26.5±1.4a | 42.2±1.1 | 38.4±1.9a | |
t值 | 0.761 | 0.171 | 0.192 | 0.030 | 0.801 | 0.190 | ||
P值 | 0.439 | <0.001 | 0.837 | <0.001 | 0.421 | <0.001 | ||
组别 | 脂肪含量(kg) | 腰围(cm) | 臀围(cm) | 腰臀比 | ||||
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | |
对照组 | 26.96±0.68 | 27.17±0.15 | 81.60±1.06 | 81.59±0.99 | 101.66±1.26 | 104.09±1.83 | 0.80±0.01 | 0.79±0.06 |
试验组 | 27.04±0.60 | 24.34±1.06a | 81.57±1.22 | 77.01±8.45a | 102.20±2.20 | 98.86±2.29a | 0.79±0.02 | 0.77±0.08 |
t值 | 0.562 | 0.190 | 0.112 | 0.105 | 1.263 | 0.183 | 0.953 | 0.569 |
P值 | 0.573 | <0.001 | 0.901 | 0.002 | 0.211 | 0.039 | 0.342 | 0.399 |
Table 2 Comparison of body composition between two groups of overweight and obese female railway workers before and after intervention
组别 | 例数 | 体质量(kg) | BMI(kg/m2) | 体脂率(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | |||
对照组 | 36 | 73.3±1.7 | 73.0±1.9 | 28.1±1.1 | 28.0±1.0 | 42.2±1.0 | 42.2±1.2 | |
试验组 | 35 | 73.6±2.3 | 68.7±2.3a | 28.0±1.4 | 26.5±1.4a | 42.2±1.1 | 38.4±1.9a | |
t值 | 0.761 | 0.171 | 0.192 | 0.030 | 0.801 | 0.190 | ||
P值 | 0.439 | <0.001 | 0.837 | <0.001 | 0.421 | <0.001 | ||
组别 | 脂肪含量(kg) | 腰围(cm) | 臀围(cm) | 腰臀比 | ||||
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | |
对照组 | 26.96±0.68 | 27.17±0.15 | 81.60±1.06 | 81.59±0.99 | 101.66±1.26 | 104.09±1.83 | 0.80±0.01 | 0.79±0.06 |
试验组 | 27.04±0.60 | 24.34±1.06a | 81.57±1.22 | 77.01±8.45a | 102.20±2.20 | 98.86±2.29a | 0.79±0.02 | 0.77±0.08 |
t值 | 0.562 | 0.190 | 0.112 | 0.105 | 1.263 | 0.183 | 0.953 | 0.569 |
P值 | 0.573 | <0.001 | 0.901 | 0.002 | 0.211 | 0.039 | 0.342 | 0.399 |
组别 | 例数 | TC | TG | LDL-C | HDL-C | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 36 | 4.3±0.8 | 4.3±0.7 | 1.2±1.0 | 1.2±0.6 | 2.5±0.8 | 2.5±0.5 | 1.2±0.3 | 1.3±0.2 |
试验组 | 35 | 4.4±0.8 | 4.1±0.3a | 1.2±1.0 | 1.0±0.6a | 2.6±0.5 | 2.4±0.1a | 1.3±0.2 | 1.4±0.2 |
t值 | 1.266 | 1.232 | 0.098 | 0.134 | 0.300 | 0.321 | 0.955 | 1.291 | |
P值 | 0.210 | 0.032 | 0.922 | 0.039 | 0.765 | 0.027 | 0.343 | 0.192 |
Table 3 Comparison of blood lipid indices between two groups overweight and obese female railway workers before and after intervention
组别 | 例数 | TC | TG | LDL-C | HDL-C | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 36 | 4.3±0.8 | 4.3±0.7 | 1.2±1.0 | 1.2±0.6 | 2.5±0.8 | 2.5±0.5 | 1.2±0.3 | 1.3±0.2 |
试验组 | 35 | 4.4±0.8 | 4.1±0.3a | 1.2±1.0 | 1.0±0.6a | 2.6±0.5 | 2.4±0.1a | 1.3±0.2 | 1.4±0.2 |
t值 | 1.266 | 1.232 | 0.098 | 0.134 | 0.300 | 0.321 | 0.955 | 1.291 | |
P值 | 0.210 | 0.032 | 0.922 | 0.039 | 0.765 | 0.027 | 0.343 | 0.192 |
组别 | 例数 | 健康责任 | 营养饮食 | 压力管理 | 体育活动 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 36 | 16.3±2.7 | 17.0±3.9 | 16.1±1.0 | 17.1±2.0 | 15.1±3.0 | 16.2±1.3 | 14.5±1.7 | 15.2±2.2 |
试验组 | 35 | 17.8±3.3 | 20.7±2.1a | 15.0±1.5 | 23.5±1.8a | 16.4±2.6 | 20.4±2.2a | 15.4±1.3 | 24.3±2.0a |
t值 | 0.803 | 1.301 | 0.866 | 1.132 | 1.323 | 1.283 | 1.011 | 0.224 | |
P值 | 0.224 | <0.001 | 0.295 | 0.012 | 0.172 | 0.003 | 0.132 | 0.001 | |
组别 | 人际关系 | 自我实现 | 总分 | ||||||
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||||
对照组 | 15.4±1.3 | 16.4±1.9 | 14.4±2.2 | 16.0±1.2 | 90.8±3.0 | 98.4±2.1 | |||
试验组 | 14.4±1.5 | 19.3±3.4a | 13.1±2.2 | 19.3±2.2a | 91.8±2.3 | 124.4±2.0a | |||
t值 | 0.104 | 0.253 | 1.065 | 0.412 | 18.277 | 19.778 | |||
P值 | 0.132 | 0.011 | 0.297 | 0.003 | 0.021 | 0.022 |
Table 4 Comparison of the total score and scores of dimensions of the HPLP-Ⅱbetween two groups of overweight and obese female railway workers before and after intervention
组别 | 例数 | 健康责任 | 营养饮食 | 压力管理 | 体育活动 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||
对照组 | 36 | 16.3±2.7 | 17.0±3.9 | 16.1±1.0 | 17.1±2.0 | 15.1±3.0 | 16.2±1.3 | 14.5±1.7 | 15.2±2.2 |
试验组 | 35 | 17.8±3.3 | 20.7±2.1a | 15.0±1.5 | 23.5±1.8a | 16.4±2.6 | 20.4±2.2a | 15.4±1.3 | 24.3±2.0a |
t值 | 0.803 | 1.301 | 0.866 | 1.132 | 1.323 | 1.283 | 1.011 | 0.224 | |
P值 | 0.224 | <0.001 | 0.295 | 0.012 | 0.172 | 0.003 | 0.132 | 0.001 | |
组别 | 人际关系 | 自我实现 | 总分 | ||||||
干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | 干预前 | 干预后 | ||||
对照组 | 15.4±1.3 | 16.4±1.9 | 14.4±2.2 | 16.0±1.2 | 90.8±3.0 | 98.4±2.1 | |||
试验组 | 14.4±1.5 | 19.3±3.4a | 13.1±2.2 | 19.3±2.2a | 91.8±2.3 | 124.4±2.0a | |||
t值 | 0.104 | 0.253 | 1.065 | 0.412 | 18.277 | 19.778 | |||
P值 | 0.132 | 0.011 | 0.297 | 0.003 | 0.021 | 0.022 |
自变量 | b | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预组别(以对照组为参照) | ||||||
试验组 | 3.353 | 0.709 | 22.397 | 0.002 | 28.612(7.132,114.688) | |
年龄(岁,以<35为参照) | ||||||
≥35 | 0.488 | 0.485 | 1.011 | 0.315 | 1.619(0.629,4.218) | |
基线营养状况(以超重为参照) | ||||||
肥胖 | 1.079 | 0.499 | 4.677 | 0.031 | 2.941(1.106,7.818) | |
受教育程度(以专科及以下为参照) | ||||||
本科及以上 | 0.209 | 0.485 | 0.185 | 0.667 | 1.232(0.476,3.190) | |
个人月收入(元,以≤5 000为参照) | ||||||
>5 000 | 0.309 | 0.546 | 0.320 | 0.572 | 1.362(0.467,3.974) | |
婚姻情况(以未婚为参照) | ||||||
已婚 | 0.077 | 0.557 | 0.019 | 0.890 | 1.080(0.362,3.220) |
Table 5 Univariate Logistic regression of the influencing factors of a 5% or more weight loss from baseline in overweight and obese female railway workers
自变量 | b | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预组别(以对照组为参照) | ||||||
试验组 | 3.353 | 0.709 | 22.397 | 0.002 | 28.612(7.132,114.688) | |
年龄(岁,以<35为参照) | ||||||
≥35 | 0.488 | 0.485 | 1.011 | 0.315 | 1.619(0.629,4.218) | |
基线营养状况(以超重为参照) | ||||||
肥胖 | 1.079 | 0.499 | 4.677 | 0.031 | 2.941(1.106,7.818) | |
受教育程度(以专科及以下为参照) | ||||||
本科及以上 | 0.209 | 0.485 | 0.185 | 0.667 | 1.232(0.476,3.190) | |
个人月收入(元,以≤5 000为参照) | ||||||
>5 000 | 0.309 | 0.546 | 0.320 | 0.572 | 1.362(0.467,3.974) | |
婚姻情况(以未婚为参照) | ||||||
已婚 | 0.077 | 0.557 | 0.019 | 0.890 | 1.080(0.362,3.220) |
自变量 | b | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预组别(以对照组为参照) | ||||||
试验组 | 1.421 | 0.613 | 5.378 | 0.020 | 4.142(1.246,13.756) | |
基线营养状况(以超重为参照) | ||||||
肥胖 | 2.513 | 0.625 | 16.176 | <0.001 | 12.337(3.626,41.972) |
Table 6 Multivariate Logistic regression of the influencing factors of a 5% or more weight loss from baseline in overweight and obese female railway workers
自变量 | b | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干预组别(以对照组为参照) | ||||||
试验组 | 1.421 | 0.613 | 5.378 | 0.020 | 4.142(1.246,13.756) | |
基线营养状况(以超重为参照) | ||||||
肥胖 | 2.513 | 0.625 | 16.176 | <0.001 | 12.337(3.626,41.972) |
[1] |
姜勇. 我国成人超重肥胖流行现状、变化趋势及健康危害研究[D]. 北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2013.
|
[2] |
国家卫生计生委疾病预防控制局. 中国居民营养与慢性病状况报告(2015年)[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2015:1.
|
[3] |
中共中央,国务院. "健康中国2030"规划纲要[EB/OL]. (2016-10-25)[2021-12-17].
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] | |
[11] |
张啸,陈大方. 基于互联网线上生活方式干预对有减重意愿人群的减重效果观察[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制,2019,27(4):257-260. DOI:10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2019.04.004.
|
[12] |
张德春,施建明,熊英,等. 科学营养与运动健身对超重与肥胖的干预[J]. 中国食物与营养,2015,21(2):76-79.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
王艳萍,邹东阳,贺修君,等. 多元化健康教育联合个性化有氧运动对高血压患者健康行为、心理压力状态的影响[J]. 中华保健医学杂志,2021,23(2):183-185.
|
[19] |
李京蕾,杨保才. 大学生人际关系与自我效能感的相关探究:以沈阳大学为例[J]. 沈阳大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(2):248-252. DOI:10.16103/j.cnki.21-1582/c.2015.02.061.
|
[20] |
王子达. 高中生体育锻炼、一般自我效能感与人际交往能力的关系研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学,2020.
|
[21] |
宁艾伦. 幼儿教师人际关系与自我效能感和职业倦怠感的相关关系研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨师范大学,2020.
|
[22] |
李晓敏,彭保艳,孙王乐贤,等. 护理人员健康促进生活方式与自我效能感关系研究[J]. 中国职业医学,2016,43(3):337-340. DOI:10.11763/j.issn.2095-2619.2016.03.021.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[1] | LI Jixin, QIU Linjie, REN Yan, WANG Wenru, LI Meijie, ZHANG Jin. The Correlation of Dietary Inflammatory Index with Overweight, Obesity and Abdominal Obesity: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4089-4097. |
[2] | PAN Yaojia, WANG Weiqiang, YI Weizhuo, GAO Bing, FU Fanglin, HAN Zheng, SUN Meng, DONG Yaqin, GU Huaicong. Relationship between Triglyceride-glucose Index and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in Middle-aged Obese Residents of Different Genders [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3628-3635. |
[3] | ZHAO Tiefu, ZHANG Bin, MA Hanying, HAN Hongya, MA Liping, GAO Xuxia, LUO Tianxiang, LUO Hongchi. Doctor-patient Communication Skills in Master Supervisors in General Practice during Outpatient Encounters: a Survey from Beijing [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(28): 3539-3543. |
[4] | WANG Qianqian, WANG Xiaohang, ZHOU Xiaoying, QIU Shanhu, SUN Zilin. Exercise is the Foundation of Weight Loss [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(28): 3471-3476. |
[5] | JIANG Qiuhui, LI Xuejun. Exercise is Not the Foundation of Weight Loss [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(28): 3477-3481. |
[6] | BIAN Lili, LI Xiaoxiao, DU Xueping, DAI Qinfang, WU Lin, SONG Beibei. Risk Stratification of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Lipid Goal Attainment in Hypertensive Patients Registered in Community [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3388-3391. |
[7] | ZHANG Li, ZHENG Wei, WANG Jia, YUAN Xianxian, HAN Weiling, HUANG Junhua, TIAN Zhihong, LI Guanghui. Comparison of Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes in Chinese Women with Singleton Pregnancy Using Standard of Recommendation for Weight Gain during Pregnancy Period and Guidelines by the Institute of Medicine [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 2959-2967. |
[8] | YIN Cong, DIAO He, SHENG Wei, CAO Yan, BAI Wenpei. Influence of Daily Self-weighing Supported by Online Supervision on Body Composition and Emotions in Overweight/Obese Women with Anxiety and Depression [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 2992-2996. |
[9] | ZHANG Lina, WANG Yan, ZHANG Kanghuai, LI Youjia. Clinical Research Progress of Tirzepatide: a New Hypoglycemic Agent [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(15): 1902-1908. |
[10] | WANG Junwei, LIN Lingjun, SONG Linling, CHENG Xiaocui, NIE Xiuling. Association between Serum Potassium and Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Primary Gout [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1479-1484. |
[11] | LIU Yanhui, CHEN Shuchun. Interpretation and Clinical Significance of the Definition and Diagnostic Criteria for Sarcopenic Obesity: ESPEN and EASO Consensus Statement [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1422-1428. |
[12] | CAI Ming, WANG Liyan, YANG Ruoyu, LIANG Leichao, YANG Yuanyuan, JIA Shihao, CHEN Ruiyi, REN Yu, LIU Qianle, HU Jingyun. Short-term High-intensity Interval Training Reduces the Accumulation of Advanced Glycation End Products and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Normal Weight Obese Female University Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1472-1478. |
[13] | YUAN Lijun, WEI Wenjing, ZHANG Xia, FU Ruiyuan, CHEN Qiu. Bariatric Surgery Increases the Risk of Fracture: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(11): 1382-1388. |
[14] | ZHANG Xiyu, LI Ye, WU Qunhong, LI Jida, HU Yu. High-precision Identification and Prediction of Spatio-temporal Evolutionary Patterns of Overweight among Children under 5 in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(07): 816-824. |
[15] | WANG Yide, LI Zheng, LI Fengsen. Role of Endocrine Function of Adipose Tissue in the Development of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Review of Recent Advances [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(06): 754-759. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||