Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (09): 1105-1112.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.02.070
Special Issue: 肿瘤最新文章合集
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Study on the Mediating Effect of Intimate Relationship between Dyadic Coping and Quality of Life in Gynecological Cancer Patients' Couples
1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang 110004,China
2.School of Nursing,China Medical University,Shenyang 110122,China
*Corresponding author:GE Lina,Associate professor;E-mail:geln@sj-hospital.org
Received:
2021-07-08
Revised:
2021-09-22
Published:
2022-03-20
Online:
2022-03-01
通讯作者:
葛莉娜
基金资助:
CLC Number:
YE Huihui, GE Lina, ZANG Shuang, HU Shuang.
Study on the Mediating Effect of Intimate Relationship between Dyadic Coping and Quality of Life in Gynecological Cancer Patients' Couples [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(09): 1105-1112.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.02.070
项目 | 积极夫妻支持应对得分 | 消极夫妻支持应对得分 | 夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 中文版Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 生理健康得分 | 心理健康得分 | 社会关系得分 | 环境领域得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
积极夫妻支持应对得分 | 1.000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
消极夫妻支持应对得分 | -0.348a | 1.000 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 0.954a | -0.200a | 1.000 | - | - | - | - | - |
中文版Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 0.733a | -0.307a | 0.695a | 1.000 | - | - | - | - |
生理健康得分 | 0.499a | -0.181a | 0.507a | 0.502a | 1.000 | - | - | - |
心理健康得分 | 0.415a | -0.108* | 0.421a | 0.531a | 0.697a | 1.000 | - | - |
社会关系得分 | 0.417a | -0.223a | 0.399a | 0.479a | 0.322a | 0.355a | 1.000 | - |
环境领域得分 | 0.668a | -0.240a | 0.664a | 0.571a | 0.524a | 0.481a | 0.475a | 1.000 |
Table 1 Pearson correlations between scores on the Dyadic Coping Inventory,the Chinese version of the Locke-Wallace Marital (love) Adjustment and Prediction Scale,and the Chinese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF questionnaire
项目 | 积极夫妻支持应对得分 | 消极夫妻支持应对得分 | 夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 中文版Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 生理健康得分 | 心理健康得分 | 社会关系得分 | 环境领域得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
积极夫妻支持应对得分 | 1.000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
消极夫妻支持应对得分 | -0.348a | 1.000 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 0.954a | -0.200a | 1.000 | - | - | - | - | - |
中文版Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 0.733a | -0.307a | 0.695a | 1.000 | - | - | - | - |
生理健康得分 | 0.499a | -0.181a | 0.507a | 0.502a | 1.000 | - | - | - |
心理健康得分 | 0.415a | -0.108* | 0.421a | 0.531a | 0.697a | 1.000 | - | - |
社会关系得分 | 0.417a | -0.223a | 0.399a | 0.479a | 0.322a | 0.355a | 1.000 | - |
环境领域得分 | 0.668a | -0.240a | 0.664a | 0.571a | 0.524a | 0.481a | 0.475a | 1.000 |
因变量 | 自变量 | B | SE | β | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生理健康 | 常量 | -13.975 | 5.895 | - | -2.342 | 0.020 |
夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 0.379 | 0.082 | 0.306 | 4.606 | <0.001 | |
Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 0.207 | 0.048 | 0.289 | 4.353 | <0.001 | |
心理健康 | 常量 | 14.147 | 5.094 | - | 2.777 | 0.006 |
夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 0.105 | 0.070 | 0.101 | 1.501 | 0.134 | |
Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 0.279 | 0.041 | 0.461 | 6.872 | <0.001 | |
社会关系 | 常量 | 11.901 | 5.895 | - | 2.019 | 0.044 |
夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 0.149 | 0.081 | 0.128 | 1.839 | 0.067 | |
Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 0.265 | 0.047 | 0.391 | 5.629 | <0.001 | |
环境领域 | 常量 | -5.913 | 3.675 | - | -1.609 | 0.109 |
夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 0.450 | 0.051 | 0.516 | 8.872 | <0.001 | |
Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 0.107 | 0.029 | 0.212 | 3.640 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Multiple linear regression analysis of influencing factors in physical domain,psychological domain,social domain,and environment domain in gynecological cancer patients
因变量 | 自变量 | B | SE | β | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生理健康 | 常量 | -13.975 | 5.895 | - | -2.342 | 0.020 |
夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 0.379 | 0.082 | 0.306 | 4.606 | <0.001 | |
Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 0.207 | 0.048 | 0.289 | 4.353 | <0.001 | |
心理健康 | 常量 | 14.147 | 5.094 | - | 2.777 | 0.006 |
夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 0.105 | 0.070 | 0.101 | 1.501 | 0.134 | |
Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 0.279 | 0.041 | 0.461 | 6.872 | <0.001 | |
社会关系 | 常量 | 11.901 | 5.895 | - | 2.019 | 0.044 |
夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 0.149 | 0.081 | 0.128 | 1.839 | 0.067 | |
Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 0.265 | 0.047 | 0.391 | 5.629 | <0.001 | |
环境领域 | 常量 | -5.913 | 3.675 | - | -1.609 | 0.109 |
夫妻支持应对量表总得分 | 0.450 | 0.051 | 0.516 | 8.872 | <0.001 | |
Lock-Wallace婚姻(恋爱)关系调适量表得分 | 0.107 | 0.029 | 0.212 | 3.640 | <0.001 |
[1] | JIANG X,TANG H,CHEN T. Epidemiology of gynecologic cancers in China[J]. J Gynecol Oncol,2018,29(1):e7. DOI:10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e7. |
[2] | FENG Y,LIU X C,LIN T W,et al. Exploring the relationship between spiritual well-being and death anxiety in patients with gynecological cancer:a cross-section study[J]. BMC Palliat Care,2021,20(1):78. DOI:10.1186/s12904-021-00778-3. |
[3] | JACOBSEN P B. Screening for psychological distress in cancer patients:challenges and opportunities[J]. J Clin Oncol,2007,25(29):4526-4527. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1367. |
[4] | 李梓萌,庞英,李金江,等. 妇科恶性肿瘤康复期患者情绪及生活质量团体心理治疗的随机对照试验[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2020,34(12):977-982. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2020.12.002. |
[5] | 谢幸,沈源明. 妇科肿瘤的防治现状与面临的挑战[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2020,36(1):20-22. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2020010104. |
[6] | 王千心,张彩云,张志刚,等. 积极心理干预对妇科癌症患者病耻感及适应水平的影响[J]. 护理学杂志,2020,35(13):71-73. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.13.071. |
[7] | BADR H,HERBERT K,RECKSON B,et al. Unmet needs and relationship challenges of head and neck cancer patients and their spouses[J]. J Psychosoc Oncol,2016,34(4):336-346. DOI:10.1080/07347332.2016.1195901. |
[8] | TRAA M J,DE VRIES J,BODENMANN G,et al. Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer:a systematic review[J]. Br J Health Psychol,2015,20(1):85-114. DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12094. |
[9] | BODENMANN G. A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping in couples[J].Swiss J Psychol,1995,54:34-49. |
[10] | AN H,CHEN C,DU R,et al. Self-efficacy,psychological distress,and marital quality in young and middle-aged couples facing lymphoma:The mediating effect of dyadic coping[J]. Psychooncology,2021,30(9):1492-1501. DOI:10.1002/pon.5711. |
[11] | 丁春戈,梅永霞,林蓓蕾,等. 二元应对在慢性病患者及其配偶中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理杂志,2018,53(5):626-630. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.05.024. |
[12] | 曹泽毅. 中华妇产科学[M]. 2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014. |
[13] | BODENMANN G.Dyadisches coping inventar:Dyadic Coping Inventory(DCI)[M]. Bern Switzerland:Huber,2008,185-202. |
[14] | XU F,HILPERT P,RANDALL A K,et al. Validation of the Dyadic Coping Inventory with Chinese couples:factorial structure,measurement invariance,and construct validity[J]. Psychol Assess,2016,28(8):e127-140. DOI:10.1037/pas0000329. |
[15] | 柏荣伟,叶赟,倪静玉. 二元应对在糖尿病患者及其配偶中的应用进展[J]. 护理管理杂志,2020,20(7):496-501. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-315x.2020.07.009. |
[16] | 汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册[M]. 增订版.北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:159-161. |
[17] | 郝元涛,方积乾. 世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表中文版介绍及其使用说明[J]. 现代康复,2000,4(8):1127-1129,1145. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2000.08.002. |
[18] | CRACIUN B. Coping strategies,self-criticism and gender factor in relation to quality of life[J]. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci,2013,78:466-470. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.332. |
[19] | 吴明隆. 结构方程模型-Amos的操作与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009. |
[20] | 罗群,周利华,王维利,等. 妇科癌症患者和配偶夫妻支持应对与亲密关系的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2017,31(12):964-970. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2017.12.006. |
[21] | HERZBERG P Y. Coping in relationships:the interplay between individual and dyadic coping and their effects on relationship satisfaction[J]. Anxiety Stress Coping,2013,26(2):136-153. DOI:10.1080/10615806.2012.655726. |
[22] | 蔡旭婷,雷丽婵,张日文.肺癌患者夫妇二元支持应对状况及影响因素分析[J].中国实用护理杂志,2020,36(12):939-944.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20191113-03325. |
[23] | 安慧颖,王月芹,陈长英,等. 中青年淋巴瘤患者二元应对水平及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学杂志,2020,35(3):70-73. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.03.070. |
[24] | 彭青,王慧慧,李雪,等. 宫颈癌术后化疗期老年患者创伤后应激障碍与创伤后成长相关性分析[J]. 新疆医科大学学报,2019,42(2):262-265. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10095551.2019.02.029. |
[25] | 倪倩倩,周利华,王维利,等. 妇科癌症患者配偶心理困扰与自我表露、亲密关系的调查分析[J]. 中华护理杂志,2016,51(5):529-533. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2016.05.003. |
[26] | 周帅,覃彦珠,张玲,等. 妇科癌症术后化疗病人身体意象现状及其影响因素研究[J]. 护理研究,2021,35(2):306-310. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.02.022. |
[27] | SHIRALI E,YARANDI F,GHAEMI M,et al. Quality of life in patients with gynecological cancers:a web-based study[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2020,21(7):1969-1975. DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.7.1969. |
[28] | HEINRICHS N,ZIMMERMANN T,HUBER B,et al. Cancer distress reduction with a couple-based skills training:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Behav Med,2012,43(2):239-252. DOI:10.1007/s12160-011-9314-9. |
[29] | 薛平莉. 二元应对干预对宫颈癌患者及其配偶心理压力及亲密关系的影响[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2020,5(2):149-150. |
[30] | HEO J,CHUN M,OH Y T,et al. Psychiatric comorbidities among ovarian cancer survivors in South Korea:a nationwide population-based,longitudinal study[J]. Psychooncology,2018,27(3):1021-1026. DOI:10.1002/pon.4628. |
[31] | GOLEZAR S,KESHAVARZ Z,RAMEZANI TEHRANI F,et al. An exploration of factors affecting the quality of life of women with primary ovarian insufficiency:a qualitative study[J]. BMC Women's Heal,2020,20(1):163. DOI:10.1186/s12905-020-01029-y. |
[32] | FALCONIER M K,JACKSON J B,HILPERT P,et al. Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction:a meta-analysis[J]. Clin Psychol Rev,2015,42:28-46. DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002. |
[33] | The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL):position paper from the World Health Organization[J]. Soc Sci Med,1995,41(10):1403-1409. DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k. |
[34] | FACCHIN F,BUGGIO L,VERCELLINI P,et al. Quality of intimate relationships,dyadic coping,and psychological health in women with endometriosis:Results from an online survey[J]. J Psychosom Res,2021,146:110502. DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110502. |
[35] | STEFANUT A M,VINTILA M,TUDOREL O I. The relationship of dyadic coping with emotional functioning and quality of the relationship in couples facing cancer-A meta-analysis[J]. Front Psychol,2020,11:594015. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.594015. |
[36] | 于歌,崔金金. 二元应对模式对慢性心力衰竭患者生活质量及其配偶间亲密关系的影响[J]. 护理学报,2019,26(16):63-67. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.16.063. |
[37] | BRANDÃO T,BRITES R,HIPÓLITO J,et al. Dyadic coping,marital adjustment and quality of life in couples during pregnancy:an actor-partner approach[J]. J Reprod Infant Psychol,2020,38(1):49-59. DOI:10.1080/02646838.2019.1578950. |
[38] | MITTINTY M M,KINDT S,MITTINTY M N,et al. A dyadic perspective on coping and its effects on relationship quality and psychological distress in couples living with chronic pain:a longitudinal study[J]. Pain Med,2020,21(2):e102-e113. DOI:10.1093/pm/pnz267. |
[39] | 成香,杜若飞,郑可心,等. 癌症病人夫妻疾病沟通的研究进展[J]. 护理研究,2021,35(1):105-109. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.01.018. |
[40] | RATNER E S,FORAN K A,SCHWARTZ P E,et al. Sexuality and intimacy after gynecological cancer[J]. Maturitas,2010,66(1):23-26. DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.01.015. |
[41] | CRANGLE C J,TORBIT L A,FERGUSON S E,et al. Dyadic coping mediates the effects of attachment on quality of life among couples facing ovarian cancer[J]. J Behav Med,2020,43(4):564-575. DOI:10.1007/s10865-019-00096-3. |
[42] | MANNE S,BADR H. Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer[J]. Cancer,2008,112():2541-2555. DOI:10.1002/cncr.23450. |
[1] | GAO Jing, ZHOU Shangcheng, GAO Sande, ZOU Guanyang, CHEN Yingyao. Health-related Quality of Life and Its Influencing Factors in Patients with Prevention of Disease in Traditionnal Chinese Medicine based on EQ-5D-5L Scale [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4043-4050. |
[2] | HU Jingyi, HONG Jing, GUO Xiaodong, ZHANG Xiaohong, MO Ning, ZHOU Xiaocui, YU Qin, ZHOU Minhua, SUN Yan, NI Liu, SHI Xiaoli, SU Xiaoqing, LI Yuqian. Efficacy of Community-involved Hospice Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(28): 3573-3584. |
[3] | SUN Yujing, ZHANG Jing, YU Hong, ZHOU Yuqiu, JIANG Wenlong, JIA Yannan. Effect of Childhood Trauma on Aggressive Behavior in Stable Schizophrenia Patients: the Chain Mediating Effect of Self-esteem and Resilience [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(23): 2899-2906. |
[4] | XUE Shan, LI Laiyou, LIANG Junli, JIN Yinghui, WEI Shuyan. The Efficacy and Safety of Home Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2540-2547. |
[5] | ZHANG Xingshan, LIN Yue, WAN Chonghua, SONG Aifeng, PAN Haiyan. A Nephrotic Syndrome-specific Quality of Life Scale: Development Based on the Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases, and Verification Using the Classical Test Theory [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2488-2495. |
[6] | LI Peiwen, HE Jiahui, MA Ximin, QIAO Hui. Health-related Quality of Life Measured Using the EQ-5D-3L and Health Service Utilization in Rural Residents of Ningxia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(19): 2361-2368. |
[7] | WU Xiaoyu, WAN Chonghua, CHEN Ying, RUAN Yanqin, WENG Yijie, XU Xiaojiang. A Review of Studies on Patient-reported Outcomes and Disease-specific Health-related Quality of Life Instruments for Irritable Bowel Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2268-2276. |
[8] | CHEN Yilin, LIN Ping, HAN Yongkui, WANG Yini. Research on the Construction of Adherence and Its Influencing Factors of Patients with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Phase Ⅰ Cardiac Rehabilitation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2209-2216. |
[9] | FU Shi, CHEN Chen, YU Mengzhu, JIN Changqin, HE Gan, CHU Qiao, HE Yaping. Potential Effect of Walking on Emotional Health among Breast Cancer Survivors: the Mediating Effects of Different Dimensions of Posttraumatic Growth [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(17): 2089-2094. |
[10] | ZHENG Qingyong, ZHAO Liang, WEI Wei, REN Xuejun, WANG Chao, SUN Rui, CONG Minghua, YU Lei, YANG Min. Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction Can Improve Psychological Condition in Breast Cancer Patients: an Overview of Systematic Reviews [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1503-1512. |
[11] | DONG Linrui, CHANG Qingqing, MA Jianjun, LIU Chuanze, GUO Dashuai, LI Xiaohuan, FAN Yongyan, LI Dongsheng. Correlation between Autonomic Dysfunction and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Parkinson's Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1450-1455,1471. |
[12] | MIAO Xueyi, DING Lingyu, LU Jinling, HU Jieman, ZHU Hanfei, CHEN Li, XU Xinyi, XU Qin. Preoperative Frailty and Postoperative Adverse Outcomes among Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(08): 980-988. |
[13] | HUA Hongxia, LIANG Hui, XU Xinyi, XU Qin, SONG Yating, YANG Ningli. Maladaptive Eating Behavior after Bariatric Surgery: a Conceptual Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(07): 783-789. |
[14] | SHI Zhao, DOU Lei, LI Shunping. Patient-reported Outcome: Recent Advances in Applications and Research at Home and Abroad [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(04): 401-408. |
[15] | HUANG Xinyi, ZHANG Yili, SUN Kai, LIU Ning, QI Baoyu, GAO Jinghua, XIE Yanming, WEI Xu. Association of Vitamin D Level with Health-related Quality of Life in Community-dwelling Elderly Population [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(36): 4515-4521. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||