Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (19): 2363-2370.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0114
Special Issue: 儿科最新文章合集
• Original Research·Clinical Quality Improvement • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-02-25
Revised:
2022-05-24
Published:
2022-07-05
Online:
2022-06-02
Contact:
Rongshao TAN
About author:
通讯作者:
谭荣韶
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0114
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 身高(cm) | 孕前体质量(kg) | 孕前BMI(kg/m2) | 孕期体质量增长(kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW组 | 24 | 30.5±0.8 | 156.9±1.1 | 50.6±1.0 | 20.5±0.5 | 12.7±0.7 |
NW组 | 479 | 30.1±0.2 | 159.7±0.2 | 52.0±0.3 | 20.4±0.1 | 13.2±0.2 |
OW组 | 13 | 31.5±1.5 | 161.2±1.4 | 57.2±1.4 | 21.9±0.6 | 17.3±1.2 |
F值 | 37.54 | 49.23 | 63.83 | 58.95 | 77.63 | |
P值 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
Table 1 General characteristic of three groups of pregnant women
组别 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 身高(cm) | 孕前体质量(kg) | 孕前BMI(kg/m2) | 孕期体质量增长(kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW组 | 24 | 30.5±0.8 | 156.9±1.1 | 50.6±1.0 | 20.5±0.5 | 12.7±0.7 |
NW组 | 479 | 30.1±0.2 | 159.7±0.2 | 52.0±0.3 | 20.4±0.1 | 13.2±0.2 |
OW组 | 13 | 31.5±1.5 | 161.2±1.4 | 57.2±1.4 | 21.9±0.6 | 17.3±1.2 |
F值 | 37.54 | 49.23 | 63.83 | 58.95 | 77.63 | |
P值 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
组别 | 例数 | 糖化血红蛋白(%) | 红细胞比容(%) | 空腹血糖(mmol/L) | 红细胞计数(×1012/L) | 血清谷氨酰转移酶(U/L) | 血红蛋白(g/L) | 血浆纤维蛋白原(g/L) | 中性粒细胞(%) | 淋巴细胞(%) | 球蛋白(g/L) | 丙氨酸氨基转移酶(U/L) | 血清胱抑素C(mg/L) | 嗜碱性粒细胞(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW组 | 24 | 5.3±0.6 | 37.9±6.3 | 4.7±1.1 | 3.5±1.2 | 35.0±1.9 | 92.0±11.7 | 4.0±1.0 | 73.0±11.2 | 22.0±0.9 | 23.0±0.6 | 38.0±1.1 | 1.3±1.0 | 1.3±0.4 |
NW组 | 479 | 4.9±0.3 | 41.7±3.5 | 4.3±0.6 | 4.2±0.5 | 28.0±0.4 | 114.0±8.6 | 3.1±0.3 | 58.0±6.2 | 32.0±0.4 | 28.0±0.3 | 22.0±0.4 | 0.9±0.5 | 0.9±0.1 |
OW组 | 13 | 5.5±0.7 | 37.2±6.8 | 4.8±1.2 | 3.6±1.1 | 37.0±1.8 | 87.0±13.0 | 3.8±0.8 | 69.0±10.4 | 24.0±0.8 | 22.0±0.7 | 43.0±1.4 | 1.3±0.9 | 1.4±0.4 |
F值 | 365.96 | 285.62 | 168.53 | 194.71 | 170.56 | 406.85 | 263.64 | 553.90 | 342.17 | 229.73 | 646.83 | 335.94 | 224.86 | |
P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Table 2 Results of clinical laboratory indices of three groups of pregnant women
组别 | 例数 | 糖化血红蛋白(%) | 红细胞比容(%) | 空腹血糖(mmol/L) | 红细胞计数(×1012/L) | 血清谷氨酰转移酶(U/L) | 血红蛋白(g/L) | 血浆纤维蛋白原(g/L) | 中性粒细胞(%) | 淋巴细胞(%) | 球蛋白(g/L) | 丙氨酸氨基转移酶(U/L) | 血清胱抑素C(mg/L) | 嗜碱性粒细胞(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW组 | 24 | 5.3±0.6 | 37.9±6.3 | 4.7±1.1 | 3.5±1.2 | 35.0±1.9 | 92.0±11.7 | 4.0±1.0 | 73.0±11.2 | 22.0±0.9 | 23.0±0.6 | 38.0±1.1 | 1.3±1.0 | 1.3±0.4 |
NW组 | 479 | 4.9±0.3 | 41.7±3.5 | 4.3±0.6 | 4.2±0.5 | 28.0±0.4 | 114.0±8.6 | 3.1±0.3 | 58.0±6.2 | 32.0±0.4 | 28.0±0.3 | 22.0±0.4 | 0.9±0.5 | 0.9±0.1 |
OW组 | 13 | 5.5±0.7 | 37.2±6.8 | 4.8±1.2 | 3.6±1.1 | 37.0±1.8 | 87.0±13.0 | 3.8±0.8 | 69.0±10.4 | 24.0±0.8 | 22.0±0.7 | 43.0±1.4 | 1.3±0.9 | 1.4±0.4 |
F值 | 365.96 | 285.62 | 168.53 | 194.71 | 170.56 | 406.85 | 263.64 | 553.90 | 342.17 | 229.73 | 646.83 | 335.94 | 224.86 | |
P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
组别 | 例数 | Firmicutes | Bacteroidetes | Actinobacteria | Protecobacteria | Euryarchaeota | Verrucomicrobia | 其他 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW组 | 24 | 85.52±9.20 | 5.63±0.70 | 5.92±0.70 | 1.29±0.20 | 0.11±0.01 | 1.43±0.20 | 0.10±0.01 |
NW组 | 479 | 78.19±8.10 | 13.16±1.30 | 5.25±0.60 | 2.13±0.20 | 0.41±0.04 | 0.75±0.20 | 0.11±0.01 |
OW组 | 13 | 78.42±8.90 | 13.67±1.70 | 1.93±0.30 | 1.68±0.30 | 0.35±0.06 | 3.86±0.50 | 0.09±0.01 |
F值 | 12.90 | 14.60 | 9.30 | 10.50 | 8.40 | 13.30 | 5.20 | |
P值 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.20 | 0.73 |
Table 3 The average relative abundance of intestinal floras at the phylum level of mothers of three groups of babies divided by birth weight
组别 | 例数 | Firmicutes | Bacteroidetes | Actinobacteria | Protecobacteria | Euryarchaeota | Verrucomicrobia | 其他 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW组 | 24 | 85.52±9.20 | 5.63±0.70 | 5.92±0.70 | 1.29±0.20 | 0.11±0.01 | 1.43±0.20 | 0.10±0.01 |
NW组 | 479 | 78.19±8.10 | 13.16±1.30 | 5.25±0.60 | 2.13±0.20 | 0.41±0.04 | 0.75±0.20 | 0.11±0.01 |
OW组 | 13 | 78.42±8.90 | 13.67±1.70 | 1.93±0.30 | 1.68±0.30 | 0.35±0.06 | 3.86±0.50 | 0.09±0.01 |
F值 | 12.90 | 14.60 | 9.30 | 10.50 | 8.40 | 13.30 | 5.20 | |
P值 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.20 | 0.73 |
Figure 1 Shannon Diversity Index measuring the alpha diversity indices of intestinal flora of mothers of three groups of babies divided by birth weight
Figure 2 Simpson's Diversity Index measuring the alpha diversity indices of intestinal flora of mothers of three groups of babies divided by birth weight
组别 | 例数 | Faecalibacterium | Roseburia | Blautia | Bacteroides | Megamonas | Lachnospiraceae+ | Ruminococcus | Paraprevotella | Streptococcus | 其他 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW组 | 24 | 17.82±1.90 | 6.52±0.80 | 6.81±0.80 | 8.26±0.90 | 5.36±0.60 | 5.22±0.60 | 5.07±0.60 | 7.25±0.70 | 1.89±0.20 | 35.8±3.90 |
NW组 | 479 | 17.39±1.60 | 8.71±0.80 | 7.96±0.80 | 5.79±0.60 | 4.35±0.50 | 6.52±0.60 | 5.81±0.60 | 5.22±0.50 | 2.75±0.30 | 35.5±3.60 |
OW组 | 13 | 19.56±2.10 | 9.42±1.10 | 5.06±0.70 | 4.64±0.70 | 8.41±1.00 | 5.09±0.70 | 5.05±0.70 | 3.18±0.60 | 3.93±0.50 | 35.6±4.10 |
F值 | 6.80 | 7.50 | 8.30 | 12.10 | 10.90 | 5.50 | 4.60 | 10.90 | 8.90 | 4.10 | |
P值 | 0.66 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.22 | 0.34 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.82 |
Table 4 The average relative abundance of intestinal flora at the genus level of mothers of three groups of babies divided by birth weight
组别 | 例数 | Faecalibacterium | Roseburia | Blautia | Bacteroides | Megamonas | Lachnospiraceae+ | Ruminococcus | Paraprevotella | Streptococcus | 其他 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW组 | 24 | 17.82±1.90 | 6.52±0.80 | 6.81±0.80 | 8.26±0.90 | 5.36±0.60 | 5.22±0.60 | 5.07±0.60 | 7.25±0.70 | 1.89±0.20 | 35.8±3.90 |
NW组 | 479 | 17.39±1.60 | 8.71±0.80 | 7.96±0.80 | 5.79±0.60 | 4.35±0.50 | 6.52±0.60 | 5.81±0.60 | 5.22±0.50 | 2.75±0.30 | 35.5±3.60 |
OW组 | 13 | 19.56±2.10 | 9.42±1.10 | 5.06±0.70 | 4.64±0.70 | 8.41±1.00 | 5.09±0.70 | 5.05±0.70 | 3.18±0.60 | 3.93±0.50 | 35.6±4.10 |
F值 | 6.80 | 7.50 | 8.30 | 12.10 | 10.90 | 5.50 | 4.60 | 10.90 | 8.90 | 4.10 | |
P值 | 0.66 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.22 | 0.34 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.82 |
Figure 6 ROC curve of random forest classification model based on maternal blood test indices for distinguishing between babies born with normal and low weight
Figure 7 ROC curve of random forest classification model based on maternal blood test indices for distinguishing between a baby with normal birth weight and a macrosomia
Figure 8 ROC curve of random forest classification model based on maternal intestinal flora OTUs for distinguishing between babies born with normal and low weight
Figure 9 ROC curve of random forest classification model based on maternal intestinal flora OTUs for distinguishing between a baby with normal birth weight and a macrosomia
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
潘娣. 运动与饮食干预下肥胖儿童体重变化的能量平衡与失衡[D]. 北京:北京体育大学,2017.
|
[7] | |
[8] |
宋伟,张志,梁胜男,等. 肥胖孕妇孕期增重及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2021,24(5):352-359. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20200821-00843.
|
[9] |
冯银宏,钱晶晶,宋学军. 孕前体重指数、孕期体重增加与妊娠期并发症及妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2021,31(2):92-96.
|
[10] |
金玉,齐宸,管滔,等. 孕期增重过多对孕妇肠道菌群及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中国微生态学杂志,2019,31(5):509-511,518. DOI:10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.201905003.
|
[11] |
吴莎. 妊娠期糖尿病孕妇体重、肠道菌群的组成变化特点及对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中国医师杂志,2019,21(6):909-911. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2019.06.026.
|
[12] |
谢幸,苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
王佩,马良坤,刘俊涛. 早/中孕期孕妇肠道菌群差异及其与妊娠期糖尿病的关系:前瞻性队列研究[J]. 协和医学杂志,2021,12(5):721-728.
|
[23] |
张青松,王妮,秦家云,等. 妊娠期便秘孕妇与健康孕妇肠道菌群差异研究[J]. 湖北医药学院学报,2021,40(4):407-412,442. DOI:10.13819/j.issn.2096-708X.2021.04.017.
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[1] | XIAO Liqi, YANG Li, CUI Saixian, ZHANG Yayuan, WANG Yulu, HE Yan. Advances in the Association of High Salt-induced Gut Microbiota Disturbances with Salt-sensitive Blood Pressure [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3704-3709. |
[2] | ZHANG Zhendong, CAI Bin, WANG Hongwei, QIAO Zengyong. Study on the Changes of Intestinal Flora and Its Metabolite Phenylacetylglutamine in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3665-3673. |
[3] | CHE Guoyu, MA Aqin, YANG Lan, LI Jing, WANG Ling. Influence of Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Pregnancy Outcomes among Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Propensity Score Matching Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 2968-2972. |
[4] | ZHANG Yushuang, KONG Lingyang, GUAN Jiachang, LI Jianbo, WANG Yiran, WANG Yu, LI Jing. 16S rDNA Sequence Analysis of the Characteristics of Gut Flora in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2496-2502. |
[5] | TANG Binzhi, YANG Qian, LING Qiying, LI Maojun, SHI Wei, WU Qing. Early Postnatal Management of an Extremely Low Birth Weight Periviable Infant [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2559-2566. |
[6] | FU Weiqiang, ZHOU Jianbo, WU Xiongjian, HUANG Caibin. Treatment Strategy of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Targeting the Intestinal Microbiota [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(06): 742-748. |
[7] | CEN Qiuyu, PANG Rizhao, CUI Yanru, WEI Juanfang, ZHANG Anren. Advances in the Mechanism of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Improving Inflammatory Bowel Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(36): 4595-4600. |
[8] | Lei MO, Ping ZHONG. Study on the Relationship between Intestinal Microflora Differences and the Incidence of Preeclampsia in Pregnant Women in the Early and Middle Stages of Pregnancy [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(20): 2489-2492. |
[9] | Xiaojun HUANG, Jin YANG, Yaqimei LEI, Zhijie ZENG, Zhaohui JIN. New Research Progress of a New Auxiliary Antihypertensive Model Targeting Intestinal Flora [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(18): 2297-2302. |
[10] | Qiuyu CEN, Rizhao PANG, Xiaomin HU, Yanru CUI, Anren ZHANG. New Developments in the Role of Lactobacillus Reuteri in Regulating Intestinal Barrier Function [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(15): 1918-1922. |
[11] |
ZENG Lin, ZHANG Pengxiang, HUANG Qian, WANG Gaoxiang, LI Huilin.
Research Progress of the Prevention and Treatment of Metabolic Diseases Based on Short Chain Fatty Acids [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(09): 1141-1147. |
[12] |
ZHANG Yushuang, YU Fuyang, WU Zhongbing, WANG Yiran, LI Jing.
Analysis of Gut Flora in a Mouse Model of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Situ [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(08): 945-951. |
[13] |
CUI Tianyi, LIU Jiarui, LYU Bin, GAO Xiumei, ZHAO Xin.
Novel Developments in the Relationship of Gut Microbiota and Immune Regulation with Childhood Asthma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(08): 1021-1026. |
[14] | XIAO Siyao,ZHANG Shunan. Recent Advances in the Relationship between Intestinal Flora and Respiratory Diseases [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(9): 1165-1172. |
[15] | LI Sisi,JIN Ying,DUAN Ya,ZHANG Cui,TIAN Meiling,MA Xuyuan,Wang Li. Epidemiological Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Low Birth Weight Infants in Hebei Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(35): 4506-4511. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||