Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (19): 2349-2355.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0118
Special Issue: 运动相关研究最新文章合集; 肥胖最新文章合集
• Original Research·Clinical Quality Improvement • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-02-25
Revised:
2022-05-24
Published:
2022-07-05
Online:
2022-06-02
Contact:
Huan ZHU
About author:
通讯作者:
朱欢
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0118
组别 | 最大脂肪氧化速率(g/min) | FATmax对应的摄氧量 | 功率(W) | 心率(次/min) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绝对值(ml/min) | 相对值(ml·kg-1·min-1) | |||||
试验前 | ||||||
有氧运动组 | 0.39±0.32 | 1 468±456 | 20.26±5.45 | 77±18 | 130±18 | |
联合运动组 | 0.40±0.25 | 1 492±346 | 20.42±4.21 | 78±21 | 128±16 | |
第5周 | ||||||
有氧运动组 | 0.51±0.21 | 1 508±311 | 21.88±4.15 | 85±14 | 135±20 | |
联合运动组 | 0.53±0.19 | 1 539±401 | 22.22±3.82 | 88±20 | 134±23 |
Table 1 Fatmax intensity in obese college students in exercise group and combined aerobic and resistance exercise group before and 5 weeks after the intervention
组别 | 最大脂肪氧化速率(g/min) | FATmax对应的摄氧量 | 功率(W) | 心率(次/min) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绝对值(ml/min) | 相对值(ml·kg-1·min-1) | |||||
试验前 | ||||||
有氧运动组 | 0.39±0.32 | 1 468±456 | 20.26±5.45 | 77±18 | 130±18 | |
联合运动组 | 0.40±0.25 | 1 492±346 | 20.42±4.21 | 78±21 | 128±16 | |
第5周 | ||||||
有氧运动组 | 0.51±0.21 | 1 508±311 | 21.88±4.15 | 85±14 | 135±20 | |
联合运动组 | 0.53±0.19 | 1 539±401 | 22.22±3.82 | 88±20 | 134±23 |
组别 | 例数 | 男/女 | 年龄( | 身高( | 体质量( | 体脂率( | BMI( |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 22 | 8/14 | 20.9±1.7 | 1.63±0.08 | 73.67±8.92 | 33.08±3.72 | 27.70±2.04 |
有氧运动组 | 22 | 8/14 | 20.8±1.1 | 1.64±0.08 | 72.47±7.73 | 32.47±4.30 | 26.94±2.14 |
联合运动组 | 22 | 8/14 | 20.8±1.8 | 1.63±0.09 | 73.03±9.13 | 32.98±4.70 | 27.32±2.29 |
F值 | - | 0.034 | 0.073 | 0.066 | 0.543 | 0.496 | |
P值 | - | 0.967 | 0.930 | 0.937 | 0.585 | 0.613 |
Table 2 Baseline data of three groups of obese college students
组别 | 例数 | 男/女 | 年龄( | 身高( | 体质量( | 体脂率( | BMI( |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 22 | 8/14 | 20.9±1.7 | 1.63±0.08 | 73.67±8.92 | 33.08±3.72 | 27.70±2.04 |
有氧运动组 | 22 | 8/14 | 20.8±1.1 | 1.64±0.08 | 72.47±7.73 | 32.47±4.30 | 26.94±2.14 |
联合运动组 | 22 | 8/14 | 20.8±1.8 | 1.63±0.09 | 73.03±9.13 | 32.98±4.70 | 27.32±2.29 |
F值 | - | 0.034 | 0.073 | 0.066 | 0.543 | 0.496 | |
P值 | - | 0.967 | 0.930 | 0.937 | 0.585 | 0.613 |
组别 | 例数 | 体质量(kg) | BMI(kg/m2) | 体脂率(%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | ||
对照组 | 22 | 73.67±8.92 | 74.41±8.40 | 27.70±2.04 | 28.01±1.72 | 33.08±3.72 | 33.73±4.72 |
有氧运动组 | 22 | 72.47±7.73 | 68.52±7.53ab | 26.94±2.14 | 25.52±2.03ab | 32.47±4.30 | 29.91±3.60ab |
联合运动组 | 22 | 73.03±9.13 | 67.92±11.76ab | 27.32±2.29 | 25.44±2.30ab | 32.98±4.70 | 29.63±3.92ab |
F值 | F组间=5.764,F交互=4.763,F时间=5.104 | F组间=4.280,F交互=4.320,F时间=5.940 | F组间=4.771,F交互=5.764,F时间=4.075 | ||||
P值 | P组间=0.013,P交互=0.030,P时间=0.026 | P组间=0.042,P交互=0.041,P时间=0.017 | P组间=0.031,P交互=0.013,P时间=0.046 |
Table 3 Comparison of body weight,BMI and body fat percentage among three groups of obese college students before and after the intervention
组别 | 例数 | 体质量(kg) | BMI(kg/m2) | 体脂率(%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | ||
对照组 | 22 | 73.67±8.92 | 74.41±8.40 | 27.70±2.04 | 28.01±1.72 | 33.08±3.72 | 33.73±4.72 |
有氧运动组 | 22 | 72.47±7.73 | 68.52±7.53ab | 26.94±2.14 | 25.52±2.03ab | 32.47±4.30 | 29.91±3.60ab |
联合运动组 | 22 | 73.03±9.13 | 67.92±11.76ab | 27.32±2.29 | 25.44±2.30ab | 32.98±4.70 | 29.63±3.92ab |
F值 | F组间=5.764,F交互=4.763,F时间=5.104 | F组间=4.280,F交互=4.320,F时间=5.940 | F组间=4.771,F交互=5.764,F时间=4.075 | ||||
P值 | P组间=0.013,P交互=0.030,P时间=0.026 | P组间=0.042,P交互=0.041,P时间=0.017 | P组间=0.031,P交互=0.013,P时间=0.046 |
组别 | 例数 | MBP基础值(PU) | MBP加热值(PU) | TcPO2(mm Hg) | SmO2(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | ||
对照组 | 22 | 8.45±4.01 | 8.43±2.36 | 90.15±19.60 | 86.95±18.12 | 59.87±7.34 | 58.81±7.26 | 61.60±5.67 | 60.09±6.25 |
有氧运动组 | 22 | 7.78±2.00 | 7.93±2.56 | 89.94±20.11 | 105.25±19.38ab | 59.02±6.98 | 65.92±7.28ab | 61.56±6.99 | 64.93±5.41a |
联合运动组 | 22 | 7.83±2.58 | 8.32±2.46 | 89.10±20.32 | 123.32±26.11abc | 59.13±7.13 | 67.49±7.50ab | 59.82±6.23 | 65.11±4.95a |
F值 | F组间=0.444,F交互=0.081,F时间=0.155 | F组间=6.888,F交互=7.704,F时间=16.931 | F组间=3.117,F交互=4.598,F时间=11.935 | F组间=1.598,F交互=3.229,F时间=4.496 | |||||
P值 | P组间=0.642,P交互=0.922,P时间=0.694 | P组间=0.002,P交互=0.001,P时间<0.001 | P组间=0.048,P交互=0.012,P时间=0.001 | P组间=0.207,P交互=0.044,P时间=0.036 |
Table 4 Comparison of microcirculation indicators of three groups of obese college students before and after the intervention
组别 | 例数 | MBP基础值(PU) | MBP加热值(PU) | TcPO2(mm Hg) | SmO2(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | ||
对照组 | 22 | 8.45±4.01 | 8.43±2.36 | 90.15±19.60 | 86.95±18.12 | 59.87±7.34 | 58.81±7.26 | 61.60±5.67 | 60.09±6.25 |
有氧运动组 | 22 | 7.78±2.00 | 7.93±2.56 | 89.94±20.11 | 105.25±19.38ab | 59.02±6.98 | 65.92±7.28ab | 61.56±6.99 | 64.93±5.41a |
联合运动组 | 22 | 7.83±2.58 | 8.32±2.46 | 89.10±20.32 | 123.32±26.11abc | 59.13±7.13 | 67.49±7.50ab | 59.82±6.23 | 65.11±4.95a |
F值 | F组间=0.444,F交互=0.081,F时间=0.155 | F组间=6.888,F交互=7.704,F时间=16.931 | F组间=3.117,F交互=4.598,F时间=11.935 | F组间=1.598,F交互=3.229,F时间=4.496 | |||||
P值 | P组间=0.642,P交互=0.922,P时间=0.694 | P组间=0.002,P交互=0.001,P时间<0.001 | P组间=0.048,P交互=0.012,P时间=0.001 | P组间=0.207,P交互=0.044,P时间=0.036 |
组别 | 例数 | NO(μmol/L) | eNOS(U/mL) | ET-1(ng/L) | VEGF(ng/L) | HOMA-IR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | ||
对照组 | 22 | 39.49±4.88 | 37.91±5.10 | 7.98±0.84 | 7.73±0.90 | 49.80±6.84 | 50.91±7.09 | 160.65±14.58 | 157.41±15.34 | 2.76±0.25 | 2.80±0.47 |
有氧运动组 | 22 | 39.85±4.18 | 44.78±4.38ab | 7.54±1.14 | 8.45±1.40a | 51.38±6.34 | 46.84±5.92a | 159.01±14.15 | 177.37±16.45a | 2.68±0.41 | 2.45±0.34ab |
联合运动组 | 22 | 39.03±5.89 | 45.20±6.14ab | 7.59±0.89 | 9.08±1.01a | 51.16±7.07 | 44.68±6.53a | 160.95±15.09 | 173.99±16.40a | 2.73±0.21 | 2.27±0.26abc |
F值 | F组间=3.743,F交互=3.929,F时间=6.833 | F组间=1.308,F交互=4.255,F时间=8.353 | F组间=0.805,F交互=2.113,F时间=4.451 | F组间=2.640,F交互=3.222,F时间=6.723 | F组间=4.430,F交互=3.196,F时间=7.420 | ||||||
P值 | P组间=0.029,P交互=0.024,P时间=0.011 | P组间=0.227,P交互=0.018,P时间=0.005 | P组间=0.451,P交互=0.129,P时间=0.039 | P组间=0.079,P交互=0.046,P时间=0.012 | P组间=0.016,P交互=0.047,P时间=0.008 |
Table 5 Comparison of NO,eNOS,ET-1 and HOMA-IR in three groups of obese college students before and after the intervention
组别 | 例数 | NO(μmol/L) | eNOS(U/mL) | ET-1(ng/L) | VEGF(ng/L) | HOMA-IR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | 试验前 | 试验后 | ||
对照组 | 22 | 39.49±4.88 | 37.91±5.10 | 7.98±0.84 | 7.73±0.90 | 49.80±6.84 | 50.91±7.09 | 160.65±14.58 | 157.41±15.34 | 2.76±0.25 | 2.80±0.47 |
有氧运动组 | 22 | 39.85±4.18 | 44.78±4.38ab | 7.54±1.14 | 8.45±1.40a | 51.38±6.34 | 46.84±5.92a | 159.01±14.15 | 177.37±16.45a | 2.68±0.41 | 2.45±0.34ab |
联合运动组 | 22 | 39.03±5.89 | 45.20±6.14ab | 7.59±0.89 | 9.08±1.01a | 51.16±7.07 | 44.68±6.53a | 160.95±15.09 | 173.99±16.40a | 2.73±0.21 | 2.27±0.26abc |
F值 | F组间=3.743,F交互=3.929,F时间=6.833 | F组间=1.308,F交互=4.255,F时间=8.353 | F组间=0.805,F交互=2.113,F时间=4.451 | F组间=2.640,F交互=3.222,F时间=6.723 | F组间=4.430,F交互=3.196,F时间=7.420 | ||||||
P值 | P组间=0.029,P交互=0.024,P时间=0.011 | P组间=0.227,P交互=0.018,P时间=0.005 | P组间=0.451,P交互=0.129,P时间=0.039 | P组间=0.079,P交互=0.046,P时间=0.012 | P组间=0.016,P交互=0.047,P时间=0.008 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
王成科,朱欢,董徽徽,等.运动对高血压患者微血管反应性的干预效应及可能机制研究进展[J].中国预防医学杂志,2021,22(9):726-731. DOI:10.16506/j.1009-6639.2021.09.013.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
齐玉刚,王津,徐冬青. 有氧抗阻结合与单纯有氧运动减重干预的对比研究[J]. 天津体育学院学报,2020,35(5):541-544. DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2020.05.008.
|
[10] |
朱欢,胡庆华,彭爱萍,等.长期太极拳运动对中老年人膝关节皮肤微血管反应性、经皮氧分压的影响[J].中国应用生理学杂志,2020,36(4):321-323,384. DOI:10.12047/j.cjap.5957.2020.069.
|
[11] |
胡庆华,乾佑玲,刘晓丽,等. 12周太极拳运动对中老年轻度高血压患者微血管反应性的影响及机制[J].中国应用生理学杂志,2021,37(6):683-687. DOI:10.12047/j.cjap.6164.2021.080.
|
[12] |
杨梅,朱欢,彭永,等. 12周FATmax强度运动对肥胖大学生外周动脉硬化的影响及机制研究[J].中国细胞生物学学报,2021,43(4):781-788. DOI:10.11844/cjcb.2021.04.0010.
|
[13] |
彭永,朱欢,杨梅,等. 12周FATmax强度运动对肥胖型非酒精性脂肪肝患者血糖血脂及肝功能的影响[J].基因组学与应用生物学,2021. [Epub ahead of print].
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
周术锋,肖哲,朱欢,等. 12周有氧运动对习惯久坐大学生微循环功能的影响[J]. 中国学校卫生,2021,42(9):1332-1335,1339. DOI:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.09.013.
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
唐东辉,侯玉洁,杨东升,等. 有氧运动结合抗阻训练对肥胖青少年微血管内皮功能的影响:第四届(2016)全国运动生理与生物化学学术会议论文集[C]. 无锡:中国体育科学学会,2016.
|
[26] |
赵军,梁晋裕.有氧运动结合抗阻训练对肥胖男性大学生身体成分、心血管功能及血清C反应蛋白水平的改善作用[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2019,45(5):1134-1140.
|
[27] | |
[28] |
杨梅,朱欢,肖杰文,等.长期有氧运动对大学生下肢微循环功能及最大摄氧量的影响[J].中国学校卫生,2021,42(7):1000-1004. DOI:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.07.010.
|
[29] |
蔡前鑫,魏文哲,赵之光,等.肌氧饱和度与全身耐力的关联性[J].山东体育科技,2016,38(2):56-59.
|
[30] |
蔡前鑫. 肌氧饱和度评定肌肉耐力和全身耐力的实验研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2016.
|
[31] |
徐坤,刘永.股四头肌肌肉氧饱和度与Wingate test无氧功率相关性分析[EB/OL].(2022-03-25)[2022-05-10].
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
罗曦娟,王正珍,李博文,等.抗阻和有氧运动对糖尿病前期人群胰岛素抵抗的影响[J]. 成都体育学院学报,2018,44(5):66-72. DOI:10.15942/j.jcsu.2018.05.011.
|
[41] |
魏建翔,何玉秀,刘阳. 有氧联合抗阻运动与单纯有氧运动改善不同人群血糖与胰岛素抵抗效果的差异比较:meta分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2021,36(8):984-991. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2021.08.015.
|
[1] | LI Jixin, QIU Linjie, REN Yan, WANG Wenru, LI Meijie, ZHANG Jin. The Correlation of Dietary Inflammatory Index with Overweight, Obesity and Abdominal Obesity: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4089-4097. |
[2] | PAN Yaojia, WANG Weiqiang, YI Weizhuo, GAO Bing, FU Fanglin, HAN Zheng, SUN Meng, DONG Yaqin, GU Huaicong. Relationship between Triglyceride-glucose Index and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in Middle-aged Obese Residents of Different Genders [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3628-3635. |
[3] | WANG Qianqian, WANG Xiaohang, ZHOU Xiaoying, QIU Shanhu, SUN Zilin. Exercise is the Foundation of Weight Loss [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(28): 3471-3476. |
[4] | JIANG Qiuhui, LI Xuejun. Exercise is Not the Foundation of Weight Loss [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(28): 3477-3481. |
[5] | ZHANG Li, ZHENG Wei, WANG Jia, YUAN Xianxian, HAN Weiling, HUANG Junhua, TIAN Zhihong, LI Guanghui. Comparison of Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes in Chinese Women with Singleton Pregnancy Using Standard of Recommendation for Weight Gain during Pregnancy Period and Guidelines by the Institute of Medicine [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 2959-2967. |
[6] | YIN Cong, DIAO He, SHENG Wei, CAO Yan, BAI Wenpei. Influence of Daily Self-weighing Supported by Online Supervision on Body Composition and Emotions in Overweight/Obese Women with Anxiety and Depression [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 2992-2996. |
[7] | HE Rong, ZHANG Li, LI Peng, ZHANG Xiaoling, ZHANG Guo, ZANG Yiran, WU Shouling, SUN Lixia. Immediate Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Arterial Stiffness in a Male Population with Different Blood Glucose Levels [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 2997-3004. |
[8] | ZHANG Lina, WANG Yan, ZHANG Kanghuai, LI Youjia. Clinical Research Progress of Tirzepatide: a New Hypoglycemic Agent [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(15): 1902-1908. |
[9] | LIU Yanhui, CHEN Shuchun. Interpretation and Clinical Significance of the Definition and Diagnostic Criteria for Sarcopenic Obesity: ESPEN and EASO Consensus Statement [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1422-1428. |
[10] | WANG Junwei, LIN Lingjun, SONG Linling, CHENG Xiaocui, NIE Xiuling. Association between Serum Potassium and Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Primary Gout [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1479-1484. |
[11] | CAI Ming, WANG Liyan, YANG Ruoyu, LIANG Leichao, YANG Yuanyuan, JIA Shihao, CHEN Ruiyi, REN Yu, LIU Qianle, HU Jingyun. Short-term High-intensity Interval Training Reduces the Accumulation of Advanced Glycation End Products and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Normal Weight Obese Female University Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1472-1478. |
[12] | YUAN Lijun, WEI Wenjing, ZHANG Xia, FU Ruiyuan, CHEN Qiu. Bariatric Surgery Increases the Risk of Fracture: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(11): 1382-1388. |
[13] | WANG Yide, LI Zheng, LI Fengsen. Role of Endocrine Function of Adipose Tissue in the Development of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Review of Recent Advances [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(06): 754-759. |
[14] | ZHAO Kang, XU Xinyi, ZHU Hanfei, LIANG Hui, YANG Ningli, LIN Rui, XU Qin. Association of Therapeutic Effects on Psychological Status of Post-bariatric Patients One Year after Surgery [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(36): 4528-4536. |
[15] | YANG Tao, ZHANG Yongjun, ZHENG Liang, GE Xuhua. Diagnostic Efficacy of New ECG Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Overweight and Obese Patients with Hypertension [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(36): 4502-4508. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||