Legal Risks of the Internet + Cross-border Medicine：Taking Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as an Example

doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.549

Abstract

Abstract: The establishment of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area provides a new opportunity for the coordinated development of medical and health undertakings in these three places.The coordinated development of medical care in the three places faces various obstacles in cross-border medical treatment.Internet medical treatment developed under the background of "internet +"，as one of the forms of telemedicine，has considerable advantages in optimizing medical resources and facilitating public access to medical care and health information.The combination of internet + cross-border medicine，although is able to take advantage of both，it faces certain legal risks.Based on the current situation of legislation in China，this paper takes the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as the object of study to explore the legal risks of the combination of cross-border medical treatment and internet medical treatment.In this regard，we can learn from the experience of the EU and sign an agreement with uniform application effectiveness to protect the legitimate rights and interests of patients，doctors and third-party medical platforms.

Key words: Cross-border medical care, Internet medical care, Medical platform, Legal risk, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao

摘要： 粤港澳大湾区的建立为三地医疗卫生事业的协同发展提供了新的契机。三地医疗协同发展面临跨径跨境医疗中的各种障碍。在“互联网+”背景下发展起来的互联网医疗作为远程医疗的形式之一，在优化医疗资源，方便社会公众就医及获取保健信息方面有着相当的优势。将互联网医疗与跨境医疗相结合发展尽管能够发挥两者优势，但面临一定的法律风险。本文基于我国立法现状，以粤港澳大湾区为对象，就跨境医疗与互联网医疗相结合的法律风险做出一定的探讨。提出可借鉴欧盟经验，签订具有统一适用效力的协议，以保障患者、医生、第三方医疗平台的合法权益。

关键词: 跨境医疗, 互联网医疗, 医疗平台, 法律风险, 粤港澳大湾区

LIU Kai. Legal Risks of the Internet + Cross-border Medicine：Taking Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as an Example　[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(31): 3809-3814. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.549.
刘凯. 互联网医疗与跨境医疗结合的法律风险：以粤港澳大湾区为例[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(31): 3809-3814. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.549.

References

［1］金启洲.所有权定义分析：对两种所有权定义方式之反思［J］．中国社会科学院研究生院学报，2005，27（5）：62-70，143.
JIN Q Z.On definition of ownership：review on two means of definition of ownership［J］．Acad J Graduate Sch Chin Acad Soc Sci，2005，27（5）：62-70，143.
［2］李本增.“金卫工程”的进展和展望［J］．中国医院管理，1998，18（1）：41-43.
LI B Z.Hospital information system：progress and prospects［J］．Chin Hosp Manag，1998，18（1）：41-43.
［3］于佳佳.远程医疗对我国现行法律适用之挑战［J］．中国社会科学院研究生院学报，2018，40（3）：125-134.
YU J J.Telemedicine：new challenges to China's current legal systems［J］．J Graduate Sch Chin Acad Soc Sci，2018，40（3）：125-134.
［4］李宝珍.论非法行医罪的主体和客观方面［J］．法律与医学杂志，2001，8（3）：145-147．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-1226.2001.03.015.
LI B Z.On the subject and the object of illegal medical practice［J］．J Law Med，2001，8（3）：145-147．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-1226.2001.03.015.
［5］郑曦，何晖雄，黄少伟，等．互联网医疗研究综述：回顾、现状与监管［J］．中国卫生法制，2018，26（4）：28-33．DOI：10.19752/j.cnki.1004-6607.2018.04.005.
ZHENG X，HE H X，HUANG S W，et al．A review of internet medical treatment：review，current situation and supervision［J］．China Heal Law，2018，26（4）：28-33．DOI：10.19752/j.cnki.1004-6607.2018.04.005.
［6］大湾区医疗健康协作平台成立［EB/OL］．（2018-03-05）［2018-11-03］．http：//www.sohu.com/a/272920300_100253795，2018.11.03.
［7］王丽丽.移动医疗是否涉及非法行医专家认为，移动医疗APP若无执业许可，或涉嫌违法［N］．检察日报，2013-09-15（01）.
［8］刘红梅，杨纲.多点执业背景下医生集团发展战略研究［J］．卫生经济研究，2017，34（9）：8-11．DOI：10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.20170825.019.
LIU H M，YANG G.Research on the development strategy of doctors group under the background of multi-point practice［J］．Heal Econ Res，2017，34（9）：8-11．DOI：10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.20170825.019.
［9］何运臻，冯旅帆，侯志远.欧盟跨境就医管理模式对中国跨省异地就医的经验借鉴［J］．中国卫生政策研究，2018，11（1）：13-20．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2018.01.003.
HE Y Z，FENG L F，HOU Z Y.Experience and reference to China's trans-provincial healthcare from European cross-border healthcare management［J］．Chin J Heal Policy，2018，11（1）：13-20．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2018.01.003.
［10］王梦娟，胡佩佩，邢冬妮，等．跨境医疗法律问题研究［J］．江苏卫生事业管理，2017，28（5）：19-22．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1005-7803.2017.05.007.
WANG M J，HU P P，XING D N，et al．Research on the legal problems of cross-border healthcare［J］．Jiangsu Health Adm，2017，28（5）：19-22．DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1005-7803.2017.05.007.