Efficacy and Safety of New Ultrasound-guided Hydrostatic Reduction vs Conventional Pneumatic Reduction for Intussusception in Pediatric Patients

doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.264

Abstract

Abstract: Background　The conventional pneumatic reduction of an intussusception is associated with a risk of perforation and considerable ionizing radiations.Objective　To compare efficacy and safety of new ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction and conventional pneumatic reduction in treating pediatric intussusception.Methods　A total of 60 patients with primary intussusception meeting inclusion criteria admitted to Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from 10 May 2016 to 2 August 2016 were enrolled.Subjects were divided into hydrostatic reduction group and pneumatic reduction group by random numbers generated by computers，each with 30 patients.The pneumatic reduction group received new ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction，and the hydrostatic reduction group received conventional pneumatic reduction.The success rate of reduction，rate of recurrence，duration of reduction，and enema pressure were recorded.Results　No significantly statistical differences were found in terms of success rate of reduction and recurrence rate between the two groups（P>0.05）.The duration of reduction in hydrostatic reduction group was significantly longer than that in pneumatic reduction group，and the enema pressure in hydrostatic reduction group was significantly higher than that in pneumatic reduction group（P<0.001）.No perforation and delayed intestinal necrosis were found in two groups. Conclusion　The new ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction and conventional pneumatic reduction have similar success rate of reduction and recurrence rate in the treatment of pediatric intussusception.The new ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction is of great use of value as its pressure is controllable，although it has longer duration of reduction and higher enema pressure.

Key words: Intussusception, Enema, Treatment outcome, Comparative effectiveness research

摘要： 背景　传统的X线引导下的空气灌肠治疗肠套叠存在较大的辐射，且有较大穿孔风险。目的　探讨超声引导下新型水灌肠仪器灌肠与传统空气灌肠在小儿肠套叠治疗中的有效性及安全性。方法　选取2016-05-10至2016-08-02于重庆医科大学附属儿童医院就诊，且符合纳入标准的原发性肠套叠患儿60例。使用电脑产生的随机数将其分为水灌肠组及空气灌肠组，各30例。水灌肠组使用超声引导下水灌肠仪器灌肠，空气灌肠组使用传统空气灌肠。观察记录两组患儿的复位成功率、复发率、复位时间及灌肠压力。结果　两组复位成功率、复发率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。水灌肠组复位时间长于空气灌肠组，灌肠压力高于空气灌肠组（P<0.001）。两组均没有肠穿孔及迟发型肠坏死发生。结论　超声引导下新型水灌肠仪器灌肠治疗小儿肠套叠的复位成功率及复发率与传统空气灌肠无统计学差异，其复位时间较空气灌肠长，压力也更大，但是由于其压力可控等优点，仍值得推广使用。

关键词: 肠套叠, 灌肠, 治疗结果, 疗效比较研究

WANG Dengliang,KANG Quan,WANG Haoming, et al. Efficacy and Safety of New Ultrasound-guided Hydrostatic Reduction vs Conventional Pneumatic Reduction for Intussusception in Pediatric Patients[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(6): 712-714. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.264.
汪登亮,康权,王浩名等. 超声引导下新型水灌肠仪器灌肠与传统空气灌肠治疗小儿肠套叠的有效性及安全性研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(6): 712-714. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.264.

References

［1］KHORANA J，SINGHAVEJSAKUL J，UKARAPOL N，et al．Prognostic indicators for failed nonsurgical reduction of intussusception［J］．Ther Clin Risk Manag，2016，12：1231-1237．DOI：10.2147/TCRM.S109785.
［2］BERES A L，BAIRD R.An institutional analysis and systematic review with meta-analysis of pneumatic versus hydrostatic reduction for pediatric intussusception［J］．Surgery，2013，154（2）：328-334．DOI：10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.036.
［3］MANDEVILLE K，CHIEN M，WILLYERD F A，et al．Intussusception：clinical presentations and imaging characteristics［J］．Pediatr Emerg Care，2012，28（9）：842-844．DOI：10.1097/PEC.0b013e318267a75e.
［4］XIE X，WU Y，WANG Q，et al．A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients［J］．J Pediatr Surg，2018，53（8）：1464-1468．
［5］BINES J E，LIEM N T，JUSTICE F A，et al．Risk factors for intussusception in infants in Vietnam and Australia：adenovirus implicated，but not rotavirus［J］．J Pediatr，2006，149（4）：452-460．DOI：10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.010.
［6］KWON S R，HA S O，OH Y T，et al．Air reduction of intussusception after abdominal blunt trauma and a literature review［J］．Clin Exp Emerg Med，2016，3（1）：59-62．DOI：10.15441/ceem.15.014.
［7］LU S J，GOH P S.Traumatic intussusception with intramural haematoma［J］．Pediatr Radiol，2009，39（4）：403-405．
［8］ERICHSEN D，SELLSTR?M H，ANDERSSON H.Small bowel intussusception after blunt abdominal trauma in a 6-year-old boy：case report and review of 6 cases reported in the literature［J］．J Pediatr Surg，2006，41（11）：1930-1932．DOI：10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.06.004.
［9］KRISHNAKUM A R，HAMEED S，UMAMAHESHWARI.Ultrasound guided hydrostatic reduction in the management of intussusception［J］．Indian J Pediatr，2006，73（3）：217-220．DOI：10.1007/BF02825484.
［10］SORANTIN E，LINDBICHLER F.Management of intussusception［J］．Eur Radiol，2004，14 Suppl 4：L146-154．DOI：10.1007/s00330-003-2033-2.
［11］DIGANT S M，RUCHA S，EKE D.Ultrasound guided reduction of an ileocolic intussusception by a hydrostatic method by using normal saline enema in paediatric patients：a study of 30 cases［J］．J Clin Diagn Res，2012，6（10）：1722-1725．

[1]	YAO Yuzhong, MA Xiaojun, SONG Huan, ZHONG Yu. The Management Effect of Diabetes "1358 model" on Community Diabetes Patients Based on "Precision Management Combining General Care and Specialty Care" [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4308-4314.
[2]	LI Qian, ZHANG Yunshu, YAN Baoping, WANG Jian, MA Yanjuan, WANG Yuan, QIN Yingjie, NA Long, REN Zhiyong, SUN Junwei, DENG Huaili, MA Hongjun, QU Xuehui, ZHOU Nan, SI Tianmei. Efficacy and Safety of Risperidone Microspheres for Injection (Ⅱ) in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4007-4012.
[3]	LU Bin, XIANG Chong, YUAN Xuesong, CAI Gaojun, WEI Wenfeng, YAN Yongmin. Effectiveness, Safety and Satisfaction of Distal Transradial Artery Approach in Cerebral Angiography [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3378-3382.
[4]	YAO Junjie, SHANG Qiangqiang, WANG Yufeng, LI Jiahui, LIU Chang, PANG Tingting. Wearable Inertial Sensors-based Efficacy Evaluation of Comprehensive Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation Due to Qi-stagnation and Blood-stasis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3450-3455.
[5]	LIU Minghao, WANG Pan, GAO Lijian, XU Shuqing, WANG Huanhuan, ZHAO Guangxian, CHEN Jue, QIAO Shubin, XU Bo, YUAN Jinqing. Feasibility, Safety and Timing of Secondary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Artery Approach [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3366-3372.
[6]	GAO Yang, WANG Yunxia, GAO Chuanyu. Familial Hypercholesterolemia in 45-year-old and Younger Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Blood Lipid Control Effect [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2232-2237.
[7]	WANG Qiuqin, ZHANG Yutong, XU Yuchen, BAI Yamei, CHEN Hua, JIANG Rongrong, YAN Shuxia, WANG Qing, XU Guihua, XIE Ying, QIAO Chun, YANG Juan. Short-term Clinical Effect of Guasha Combined with Drug Therapy on Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(17): 2155-2161.
[8]	YANG Bei, HAN Lin, WANG Yin, CHENG Kangyao. Effectiveness of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Injection in Type 2 Diabetes in Older Adults: a Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(15): 1892-1901.
[9]	LIU Chuanfen, LI Zheng, WU Manyan, CUI Yuxia, SONG Jing, ZHANG Chunying, CHEN Hong. Analysis of Serum Lipid Level and Drug Use in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(11): 1325-1329.
[10]	FEI Jingwen, LIN Huize, ZHANG Pingping, LIU Lanping, WANG Xiang, SHEN Jianghong, ZHU Kexin, YANG Tao, YU Jinna. Motion Style Acupuncture Can Effectively Improve the Effectiveness of Acute Nonspecific Low Back Pain: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1044-1052.
[11]	TIAN Maosheng, GAO Jihua, XU Jiancheng, QI Wenyue, WANG Linyue, GAO Ce. Clinical Effect of Mussel Adhesive Protein with Tongyangxiao Lotion in Grades 1 and 2 Mixed Hemorrhoids [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(08): 955-962.
[12]	GUAN Ningxiao, YAO Zhuoya, LI Ye, LIU Ziwei, LIU Fangli. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques Can Effectively Relieve Post-stroke Fatigue: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(08): 1008-1014.
[13]	HU Shuwei, OU Wei, WANG Zhi, PENG Juan. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing versus Sertraline in the Treatment of Depressed Adolescents with Childhood Trauma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(06): 692-698.
[14]	HUANG Tao, LUO Na, LUO Song, XU Qin. Clinical Application of a Novel Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Face Mask with Two Channels and Constant Leakage for Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Carbon Dioxide Retention [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(03): 343-347.
[15]	SONG Pingan, CHEN Xiaoliang, YAO Yuan, GAO Jin, YANG Yang, CUI Hongchun, ZHANG Yi. Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitors Monotherapy for Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(02): 241-247.