中国全科医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (04): 393-401.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.A0026

• 标准·指南·共识 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用CRISP清单,提升我国全科医学和基本医疗研究报告的质量

杨辉1,*(), 汪洋2,3, 陈庆奇4, 刘晨曦5, 顾杰6,7, 赵洋8,9, 秦江梅10, 曹新阳11, Sturgiss Elizabeth12, Phillips William R.13, 许岩丽11,*()   

  1. 1.VIC 3168澳大利亚墨尔本市,Monash大学公共卫生与预防医学学院
    2.200090 上海市全科医学与社区卫生发展研究中心
    3.200090 上海市,同济大学附属杨浦医院全科医学科
    4.999077 香港特别行政区,香港大学家庭医学及基层医疗学系
    5.430000 湖北省武汉市,华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院
    6.200032 上海市,复旦大学附属中山医院全科医学科
    7.200032 上海市,复旦大学附属中山医院国际医疗部
    8.2050澳大利亚悉尼,新南威尔士大学乔治全球健康研究院
    9.3010澳大利亚墨尔本,墨尔本大学人口与全球健康学院
    10.100044 北京市,国家卫生健康委卫生发展研究中心
    11.100053 北京市,《中国全科医学》杂志社有限公司
    12.VIC 3168 School of Primary and Allied Health Care,Monash University,Melbourne,Victoria,Australia
    13.98195 University of Washington,Seattle,Washington
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-15 修回日期:2024-10-26 出版日期:2025-02-05 发布日期:2024-12-03
  • 通讯作者: 杨辉, 许岩丽

  • 作者贡献:

    杨辉、汪洋负责研究的构思与设计;杨辉、汪洋、陈庆奇、刘晨曦、顾杰、赵洋、秦江梅、曹新阳撰写论文;杨辉、Elizabeth Sturgiss、William R. Phillips进行论文的修订;杨辉、许岩丽负责文章的质量控制与审查,对文章整体负责,监督管理。

Applying the Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care Checklist to Improve Reporting Quality in Primary Care Research in China

YANG Hui1,*(), WANG Yang2,3, CHEN Qingqi4, LIU Chenxi5, GU Jie6,7, ZHAO Yang8,9, QIN Jiangmei10, CAO Xinyang11, Sturgiss Elizabeth12, Phillips William R.13, XU Yanli11,*()   

  1. 1. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne VIC 3168, Australia
    2. Shanghai General Practice and Community Health Development Research Center, Shanghai 200090, China
    3. Department of General Practice, Yangpu Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200090, China
    4. Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
    5. School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430000, China
    6. Department of General Practice, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    7. Department of International Medical Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    8. George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2050, Australia
    9. School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
    10. China National Health Development Research Center, Beijing 100044, China
    11. Publishing House Co., Ltd. of Journal of Chinese General Practice, Beijing 100053, China
    12. School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia
    13. Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA
  • Received:2024-10-15 Revised:2024-10-26 Published:2025-02-05 Online:2024-12-03
  • Contact: YANG Hui, XU Yanli

摘要: 基本医疗(初级保健)研究报告内容的条目共识(CRISP)工作组于2023年提出了CRISP清单,以支持改善上述领域研究报告的质量、实用性和传播性。《中国全科医学》英文版的学术编辑团队对CRISP清单进行了中文翻译,并通过这篇述评,在回顾我国全科医学和基本医疗研究的内涵和发展现状的基础上,归纳了该领域的科研报告中目前存在的主要问题,如"以作者为中心""过度重视塑造权威性""盲目生搬国际经验""缺乏对方法学的透明报告""在论文中压入大量冗繁信息"以及"遮蔽关键信息"等。最后,编辑团队推荐和鼓励中国的全科医学和基本医疗服务研究的作者、编辑和学术评议专家尝试使用CRISP清单,在改善中国全科医学和基本医疗研究报告质量的同时,进一步完善该工具在学科发展研究、临床研究、卫生服务研究、卫生政策研究、教育和培训研究以及社区流行病学研究等亚领域中的应用。

关键词: 全科医学, 基本医疗, 研究报告, 内容, 共识

Abstract:

In 2023, the Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) Working Group introduced a consensus checklist aimed at enhancing the quality, practicality, and dissemination of research reports in general practice and primary care. The editorial team of the Chinese General Practice Journal translated the CRISP checklist into Chinese and conducted a review of the current status of primary care research in China. The review identifies major problems in the field, including six common problems: "author-centered orientation" "overemphasis on authority" "uncritically adopting international experience" "lack of rigor in reporting methodologies" "inclusion of excessive and redundant information" and "lack of transparency". Finally, the editorial team encourages authors, editors, and reviewers in China to adopt the CRISP checklist to improve the quality of primary care research reports. Additionally, the review provides specific recommendations for applying the CRISP Checklist in various subfields, such as discipline development research, clinical research, health services research, health policy research, medical education research, and community epidemiological research.

Key words: General practice, Primary care, Research report, Content, Consensus

中图分类号: