中国全科医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (31): 3857-3864.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0051

• 指南·共识 • 上一篇    下一篇

腰椎间盘突出症临床实践指南和专家共识的方法学质量评价与综合分析

秦晓宽1, 孙凯1,2, 冯天笑1,3, 肖想玉1,4, 王国辰5, 苏祥飞5, 魏戌1,2,*(), 朱立国1,2,*()   

  1. 1.100102 北京市,中国中医科学院望京医院
    2.100012 北京市,中医正骨技术北京市重点实验室
    3.100029 北京市,北京中医药大学
    4.250355 山东省济南市,山东中医药大学
    5.100029 北京市,中华中医药学会
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-26 修回日期:2024-07-08 出版日期:2024-11-05 发布日期:2024-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 魏戌, 朱立国

  • 作者贡献:

    秦晓宽负责资料收集、数据整理分析及论文初稿撰写;孙凯、冯天笑负责文献筛选、信息提取;肖想玉负责数据整理;王国辰、苏祥飞负责论文稿件修订;魏戌、朱立国负责论文选题、构思设计、团队组建、全程质量控制及论文审校。

  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC1712800,2021YFC1712803); 2022年度北京中医药"十四五"重点专科项目(BJZKLC0004); 中华中医药学会研究与评价课题(CACMRE2020-A-01)

Methodological Quality Evaluation and Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Expert Consensus for Lumbar Disc Herniation

QIN Xiaokuan1, SUN Kai1,2, FENG Tianxiao1,3, XIAO Xiangyu1,4, WANG Guochen5, SU Xiangfei5, WEI Xu1,2,*(), ZHU Liguo1,2,*()   

  1. 1. Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China
    2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Zhenggu Technology, Beijing 100102, China
    3. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
    4. Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ji'nan 250355, China
    5. China Association of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2024-01-26 Revised:2024-07-08 Published:2024-11-05 Online:2024-08-16
  • Contact: WEI Xu, ZHU Liguo

摘要: 背景 腰椎间盘突出症是腰痛最常见的原因之一,近年来发病人数逐年攀升。高质量的指南可规范临床诊疗行为,提高医疗质量,筛选和制订高质量的指南对于规范腰椎间盘突出症的临床实践具有十分重要的意义。 目的 系统分析腰椎间盘突出症诊疗指南和专家共识方法学质量,并对高质量指南和共识推荐意见进行分析,以期为腰椎间盘突出症的防治提供借鉴。 方法 计算机检索数据库、指南网和相关专业网中腰椎间盘突出症指南和专家共识,检索时间为各数据库建库至2023-10-31。同时手工检索当当网等获取以专著形式出版的腰椎间盘突出症指南。由2名研究人员通过一致性评价后,采用临床指南研究与评价系统Ⅱ(AGREE Ⅱ)对纳入的指南及共识进行方法学质量评价,并对高质量指南和共识推荐意见进行分析。 结果 共纳入15部指南及共识,最终9部评级为B级(修改后可推荐),6部为C级(暂不推荐)。推荐疗法主要包括卧床休息、药物治疗、手术治疗等。 结论 腰椎间盘突出症诊疗指南和专家共识的方法学质量有待进一步提高,部分治疗方法存在争议,指南推荐意见尚需进一步完善、统一,以优化临床实践。

关键词: 腰椎间盘突出症, 腰痛, 指南, 专家共识, 指南研究与评价工具Ⅱ, 方法学质量评价

Abstract:

Background

Lumbar disc herniation is one of the most common causes of low back pain, and the number of cases has been increasing year by year in recent years. High-quality guidelines can standardize clinical diagnosis and treatment behaviors and improve medical quality, and screening and formulating high-quality guidelines are of great significance for standardizing the clinical practice of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Objective

To systematically evaluate the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, and to analyze the high-quality guidelines and consensus recommendations, in order to provide reference for the prevention and treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Methods

Clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus on lumbar intervertebral disc herniation were searched from the establishment of each database to October 31, 2023. At the same time, Dangdang.com and others were manually searched to obtain the guidelines for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation published in the form of monographs. After the consistency evaluation was passed by two researchers, the methodological quality of the included guidelines and consensus was evaluated using the AGREE Ⅱ tool, and the high-quality guidelines and consensus recommendations were analyzed.

Results

A total of 15 guidelines and consensus were included, and the final recommendation level of 9 guidelines was B (can be recommended after modification), and 6 guidelines and consensus were C (not recommended for the time being). Recommendations mainly include bed rest, medication, surgical treatment, etc.

Conclusion

The methodological quality of the clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation needs to be further improved, and some treatment methods are controversial, and the recommendations of the guidelines need to be further improved and unified to optimize clinical practice.

Key words: Lumbar disc herniation, Lumbago, Guidelines, Expert consensus, AGREEⅡ, Methodological quality assessment

中图分类号: