[1] |
孙建衡,盛修贵,白萍. 妇科肿瘤学[M]. 2版. 北京:北京大学医学出版社,2019:236.
|
[2] |
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Cervical cancer [EB/OL]. [2021-02-19].
|
[3] |
LANDONI F, MANEO A, COLOMBO A,et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stageⅠb-Ⅱa cervical cancer[J]. Lancet, 1997, 350(9077):535-540. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02250-2.
|
[4] |
SEDLIS A, BUNDY B N, ROTMAN M Z,et al. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stageⅠB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy:a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1999, 73(2):177-183. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5387.
|
[5] |
DATTA N R, STUTZ E, LIU M,et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervix cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2017, 145(2):374-385. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.033.
|
[6] |
CHINO J, ANNUNZIATA C M, BERIWAL S,et al. Radiation therapy for cervical cancer:executive summary of an ASTRO clinical practice guideline[J]. Pract Radiat Oncol, 2020, 10(4):220-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.04.002.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
LUO H C, LIN G S, LIAO S G,et al. Cervical cancer treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy base on Sedlis criteria (NCCN VS RTOG)[J]. Br J Radiol, 2018, 91(1081):20170398. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170398.
|
[10] |
NAIK A, GURJAR O P, GUPTA K L,et al. Comparison of dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity of intensity-modulated and three-dimensional radiotherapy in patients with cervix carcinoma:a randomized prospective study[J]. Cancer Radiother, 2016, 20(5):370-376. DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.05.011.
|
[11] |
KLOPP A H, YEUNG A R, DESHMUKH S,et al. Patient-reported toxicity during pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy:NRG oncology-RTOG 1203[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(24):2538-2544. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.4273.
|
[12] |
CHANG Y, YANG Z Y, LI G L,et al. Correlations between radiation dose in bone marrow and hematological toxicity in patients with cervical cancer:a comparison of 3DCRT,IMRT,and RapidARC[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2016, 26(4):770-776. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000660.
|
[13] |
LIN A J, KIDD E, DEHDASHTI F,et al. Intensity modulated radiation therapy and image-guided adapted brachytherapy for cervix cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2019, 103(5):1088-1097. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.012.
|
[14] |
OSBORNE E M, KLOPP A H, JHINGRAN A,et al. Impact of treatment year on survival and adverse effects in patients with cervical cancer and paraortic lymph node metastases treated with definitive extended-field radiation therapy[J]. Pract Radiat Oncol, 2017, 7(3):e165-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.09.003.
|
[15] |
WAKATSUKI M, KATO S, OHNO T,et al. Multi-institutional observational study of prophylactic extended-field concurrent chemoradiation therapy using weekly cisplatin for patients with pelvic node-positive cervical cancer in east and Southeast Asia[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2019, 105(1):183-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.04.039.
|
[16] |
YU C, ZHU W, JI Y,et al. A comparative study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and standard radiation field with concurrent chemotherapy for local advanced cervical cancer[J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol,2015,36(3):278-282.
|
[17] |
MARJANOVIC D, PLESINAC KARAPANDZIC V, STOJANOVIC RUNDIC S,et al. Implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and comparison with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of cervical cancer[J]. J BUON,2019,24(5):2028-2034.
|
[18] |
GUO M F, HUANG E L, LIU X F,et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy in radical irradiation for cervical cancer without lymphadenectasis:dosimetric and clinical results[J]. Oncol Res Treat, 2018, 41(3):105-109. DOI: 10.1159/000484608.
|
[19] |
WALI L, HELAL A, DARWESH R,et al. A dosimetric comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy in localized cervical cancer radiotherapy[J]. J Xray Sci Technol, 2019, 27(3):473-483. DOI: 10.3233/XST-180468.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
DE BOER P, VAN DE SCHOOT A J A J, WESTERVELD H,et al. Target tailoring and proton beam therapy to reduce small bowel dose in cervical cancer radiotherapy:a comparison of benefits[J]. Al, 2018, 194(3):255-263. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1224-8.
|
[22] |
MAYADEV J, VISWANATHAN A, LIU Y,et al. American Brachytherapy Task Group Report:a pooled analysis of clinical outcomes for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer[J]. Brachytherapy, 2017, 16(1):22-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.03.008.
|
[23] |
FIELDS E C, HAZELL S, MORCOS M,et al. Image-guided gynecologic brachytherapy for cervical cancer[J]. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2020, 30(1):16-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.08.010.
|
[24] |
DIMOPOULOS J C A, PETROW P, TANDERUP K,et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV):basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2012, 103(1):113-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.024.
|
[25] |
BATUMALAI V, BURKE S, ROACH D,et al. Impact of dosimetric differences between CT and MRI derived target volumes for external beam cervical cancer radiotherapy[J]. Br J Radiol, 2020, 93(1114):20190564. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190564.
|
[26] |
CARESIA-ARÓZTEGUI A P, DELGADO-BOLTON R C, ALVAREZ-RUIZ S,et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in locally advanced cervical cancer:a review[J]. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed), 2019, 38(1):59-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2018.08.004.
|
[27] |
KHIEWVAN B, TORIGIAN D A, EMAMZADEHFARD S,et al. Update of the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in the management of patients with cervical cancer[J]. Hell J Nucl Med, 2016, 19(3):254-268. DOI: 10.1967/s002449910409.
|
[28] |
HOLSCHNEIDER C H, PETEREIT D G, CHU C,et al. Brachytherapy:a critical component of primary radiation therapy for cervical cancer:from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) and the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS)[J]. Brachytherapy, 2019, 18(2):123-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.11.009.
|