中国全科医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (14): 1813-1819.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.461

所属专题: 男性健康最新文章合集

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

他达拉非联合坦索罗辛治疗男性下尿路症状合并勃起功能障碍疗效及安全性的Meta分析

李金泽,彭磊,李云祥*,韦堂墙,熊蔚,牛超,张宗平   

  1. 637000四川省南充市,川北医学院附属南充市中心医院泌尿外科
    *通信作者:李云祥,教授,硕士生导师;E-mail:liyunxiang369@126.com
  • 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-05-15
  • 基金资助:
    国家青年自然科学基金资助项目(81900617);四川省科技厅重点研发项目(2020YFS0320)

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Tadalafil and Tamsulosin in Treating Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction in Men:a Meta-analysis 

LI Jinze,PENG Lei,LI Yunxiang*,WEI Tangqiang,XIONG Wei,NIU Chao,ZHANG Zongping   

  1. Department of Urology,the Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong 637000,China
    *Corresponding author:LI Yunxiang,Professor,Master supervisor;E-mail:liyunxiang369@126.com
  • Published:2021-05-15 Online:2021-05-15

摘要: 背景 坦索罗辛与他达拉非(TAD)已广泛用于治疗下尿路症状(LUTS)和勃起功能障碍(ED),但联合方案治疗男性LUTS合并ED的疗效与安全性仍存在争议。目的 系统评价TAD联合坦索罗辛与TAD单药治疗男性LUTS合并ED的疗效和安全性。方法 系统检索PubMed、EMBase、Cochrane Controlled Trials Register、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台以及维普网,查找关于TAD联合坦索罗辛与TAD单药治疗男性LUTS合并ED疗效比较的研究,检索时限为建库至2020-02-29。提取第一作者姓名、发表年份、国家、研究类型、样本量、研究对象的年龄及体质指数、干预措施、药物剂量、随访时间、结局指标〔国际前列腺症状(IPSS)总评分、IPSS储尿期症状评分、IPSS排尿期症状评分、生活质量评分、最大尿流率、残余尿量以及国际勃起功能指数5(IIEF-5)评分、不良反应发生率(包括总不良反应发生率和头痛、肌痛、背痛、眩晕、鼻咽炎、射精功能障碍发生率)、因发生不良反应而终止治疗率〕等信息,并采用RevMan 5.3.0软件对数据进行评估和统计分析。结果 最终纳入6篇文献(均为高质量文献),共包括776例患者,其中联合治疗组394例,TAD组382例。Meta分析结果显示,联合治疗组在降低IPSS总评分〔MD=-2.67,95%CI(-3.82,-1.50),P<0.001〕、IPSS储尿期症状评分〔MD=-0.55,95%CI(-0.85,-0.26),P=0.000 2〕、IPSS排尿期症状评分〔MD=-0.97,95%CI(-1.43,-0.51),P<0.001〕、生活质量评分〔MD=-0.37,95%CI(-0.51,-0.23),P<0.001〕,改善最大尿流率方面〔MD=1.45,95%CI(0.90,1.99),P<0.000 01〕优于TAD组。两组残余尿量〔MD=-4.22,95%CI(-12.82,4.39),P=0.34〕、IIEF-5评分〔MD=0.44,95%CI(-0.23,1.11),P=0.19〕、总不良反应发生率〔OR=1.43,95%CI(0.98,2.08),P=0.06〕、头痛发生率〔OR=1.34,95%CI(0.66,2.72),P=0.42〕、肌痛发生率〔OR=1.56,95%CI(0.64,3.82),P=0.33〕、背痛发生率〔OR=1.45,95%CI(0.40,5.22),P=0.57〕、眩晕发生率〔OR=1.14,95%CI(0.27,4.76),P=0.86〕、鼻咽炎发生率〔OR=0.47,95%CI(0.10,2.21),P=0.34〕、射精功能障碍发生率〔OR=3.81,95%CI(0.44,32.97),P=0.22〕、因发生不良反应而终止治疗率〔OR=1.44,95%CI(0.88,2.35),P=0.15〕比较,差异无统计学意义。结论 与TAD单药相比,TAD联合坦索罗辛在改善患者LUTS方面的疗效更明显,但两者在改善ED和安全性方面没有明显的差异。对于同时存在LUTS合并ED的男性患者,可推荐使用TAD联合坦索罗辛方案。受纳入研究数量的限制,需要进一步的高质量的随机对照试验来证实这些发现。

关键词: 下尿路症状, 勃起功能障碍, 他达拉非, 坦索罗辛, Meta分析, 系统评价

Abstract: Background Tamsulosin and tadalafil(TAD)have been widely used for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS)and erectile dysfunction(ED).However,the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of these two medicines for LUTS and ED in men is still controversial.Objective To systematically investigate the efficacy and safety of TAD plus tamsulosin compared with TAD monotherapy in treating men with LUTS and ED.Methods PubMed,EMBase,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,SinoMed,CNKI,WanFang Data Service Platform,and CQVIP databases were searched extensively from inception to February 29,2020 to obtain eligible studies comparing the efficacy and safety of TAD plus tamsulosin and TAD monotherapy in treating men with LUTS and ED.Data were extracted,such as the name(s)of the first author(s),year of publication,geographical location(country)of the research setting,types of research,sample size,age and BMI of the subjects,interventions,dosage,follow-up time and outcome indicators 〔total International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS)score,IPSS storage subscore,IPSS voiding subscore,quality of life score,maximum urinary flow rate,post-void residual urine volume and International Index of Erectile Function-5(IIEF-5)score〕,incidence of adverse events(including total incidence of adverse events,incidence of headache,myalgia,back pain,dizziness,nasopharyngitis and ejaculation dysfunction),and rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events.Revman 5.3.0 was used for data evaluation and statistical analysis.Results Six studies were included,all were assessed with high methodological quality,involving 776 cases,394 in the combination group and 382 in the TAD group.The results of the meta-analysis indicated that compared with the TAD group,the combination group obtained more benefits from treatment in aspects of total IPSS score 〔MD=-2.67,95%CI(-3.82,-1.50),P<0.001〕,IPSS storage subscore 〔MD=-0.55,95%CI(-0.85,-0.26),P=0.000 2〕,IPSS voiding subscore 〔MD=-0.97,95%CI(-1.43,-0.51),P<0.001〕,quality of life score 〔MD=-0.37,95%CI(-0.51,-0.23),P<0.001〕,and maximum urinary flow rate 〔MD=1.45,95%CI(0.90,1.99),P<0.000 01〕.However,there were no significant differences in post-void residual urine volume 〔MD=-4.22,95%CI(-12.82,4.39),P=0.34〕,IIEF-5 score 〔MD=0.44,95%CI(-0.23,1.11),P=0.19〕,the incidence of adverse events 〔OR=1.43,95%CI(0.98,2.08),P=0.06〕,the incidence of headache 〔OR=1.34,95%CI(0.66,2.72),P=0.42〕,myalgia 〔OR=1.56,95%CI(0.64,3.82),P=0.33〕,back pain 〔OR=1.45,95%CI(0.40,5.22),P=0.57〕,dizziness 〔OR=1.14,95%CI(0.27,4.76),P=0.86〕,nasopharyngitis 〔OR=0.47,95%CI(0.10,2.21),P=0.34〕,ejaculatory dysfunction 〔OR=3.81,95%CI(0.44,32.97),P=0.22〕,and the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events 〔OR=1.44,95%CI(0.88,2.35),P=0.15〕 between the two groups.Conclusion Both therapies have similar beneficial effects on ED and similar safety,but the combination of TAD plus tamsulosin is more effective for the improvement of the LUTS.Hence,the combination therapy may be recommended as a suitable option for men with both LUTS and ED.However,due to limited evidence,high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to further confirm these findings.

Key words: Lower urinary tract symptoms, Erectile dysfunction, Tadalafil, Tamsulosin, Meta-analysis, Systematic review