中国全科医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (36): 4590-4596.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.618

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于常识模型的2型糖尿病伴低血糖意识受损患者疾病感知的混合方法研究

沈支佳1,罗彩凤1*,刘巧艳2,步红兵2,尹卫2,朱冬梅1   

  1. 1.212000江苏省镇江市,江苏大学医学院 2.212000江苏省镇江市,江苏大学附属医院
    *通信作者:罗彩凤,教授;E-mail:Lcf0105@163.com
  • 出版日期:2020-12-20 发布日期:2020-12-20

Illness Perception of Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia as Defined by the Common-sense Model in Type 2 Diabetics:a Mixed Methods Study 

SHEN Zhijia1,LUO Caifeng1*,LIU Qiaoyan2,BU Hongbing2,YIN Wei2,ZHU Dongmei1   

  1. 1.School of Medicine,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212000,China
    2.Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212000,China
    *Corresponding author:LUO Caifeng,Professor;E-mail:Lcf0105@163.com
  • Published:2020-12-20 Online:2020-12-20

摘要: 背景 疾病感知对于患者的疾病管理和健康结局具有重要意义。目前国内外文献鲜有报道2型糖尿病经胰岛素治疗后低血糖意识受损(IAH)患者疾病感知现状与特异性体验。目的 基于常识模型,了解不同应对方式的胰岛素治疗后2型糖尿病伴IAH患者疾病感知现状与特异性体验,为2型糖尿病伴IAH患者疾病感知的干预提供参考依据。方法 本研究采用混合方法研究的解释性序列设计,分为两个阶段,第一阶段的量性研究资料来源于2019年2—12月在江苏大学附属医院内分泌科住院的2型糖尿病伴IAH患者,采用调查问卷〔包括患者一般资料、简易疾病感知问卷(BIPQ)、简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)〕由被调查者自填或研究人员代填的方式进行问卷调查,分析不同应对方式的2型糖尿病伴IAH患者BIPQ总分及疾病后果、时间特性、个人控制、治疗控制、疾病认同、疾病担忧、疾病理解能力、情绪反应因子得分;第二阶段的质性研究资料来源于量性研究中14例患者的面对面、半结构式深入访谈,分析不同应对方式的2型糖尿病伴IAH患者疾病感知(疾病后果、个人控制、疾病认同、疾病担忧、疾病理解能力与情绪反应)存在差异的原因与真实体验。结果 量性研究结果:回收有效问卷133例,有效回收率为100.0%。133例2型糖尿病伴IAH患者中积极应对方式49例(36.8%),消极应对方式84例(63.2%)。积极应对的2型糖尿病伴IAH患者BIPQ总分及疾病后果、个人控制、疾病认同、疾病担忧、疾病理解能力、情绪反应因子得分高于消极应对者(P<0.05)。质性研究结果:访谈针对不同应对方式的2型糖尿病伴IAH患者各提出5个主题,积极应对者:难以采取适宜的预防、处理措施,症状识别敏感,社会交往受限,应激情绪、行为明显与疾病知识需求强烈;消极应对者:经验性识别低血糖,合理化IAH,否认受IAH影响,缺少疾病带来的心理波动体验与强调高血糖的危害。结论 大部分2型糖尿病伴IAH患者的疾病应对方式为消极应对方式,不同应对方式的2型糖尿病伴IAH患者疾病感知体验具有特异性,医护人员应依据患者的疾病感知体验与应对方式提供专业性、个性化的健康教育与情感支持。

关键词: 糖尿病, 2型;低血糖意识受损;胰岛素;疾病感知;应对方式;常识模型;混合方法研究

Abstract: Background Illness perception has great significant implications for patient disease management and health outcomes.Currently,quite few reports focus on the level and specific experience of illness perceptions of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) following insulin therapy in type 2 diabetics.Objective To explore the level and specific experience of illness perception of IAH as defined by the common-sense model following insulin therapy in type 2 diabetics,to provide a basis for delivering targeted interventions for such patients.Methods This study adopted a two-phase,mixed-methods sequential explanatory design.The first phase was a quantitative analysis.Eligible type 2 diabetes inpatients with IAH following insulin therapy were recruited from Department of Endocrinology,Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University from February to December 2019 and received a self-administered or researcher-administered questionnaire survey using Demographic Questionnaire developed by our research group,the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire(BIPQ) and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire(SCSQ).The scale score of BIPQ,and scores of consequences,timeline,personal and treatment control,identity,concern,overall comprehension of illness,and emotional response were compared by coping strategies.The second phase was a qualitative analysis.Qualitative data were derived from semi-structured face-to-face in-depth interviews with 14 cases selected from the participants of the first phase of study and were analyzed comparatively,including real experience of IAH,and illness perceptions of IAH(consequences,personal control,identify,concern,overall comprehension of illness,and emotional response) related to coping strategies.Results The questionnaire survey obtained a response rate of 100.0%(113/113).The prevalence of using negative and positive coping strategies was 36.8%(49/133) and 63.2%(84/133),respectively.Participants who used positive coping strategies had higher mean scale score of BIPQ,and higher mean scores of consequences,personal control,identity,concern,overall comprehension of illness,and emotional response(P<0.05).5 themes were summarized from the interview results of participants using positive coping strategies:difficulties to take appropriate prevention and treatment measures for IAH,sensitivity to recognize the symptoms of IAH,restricted social communication,emotional responses,typical behaviors and eager for illness knowledge.5 themes were also summarized from the interview results of those using negative coping strategies:identifying hypoglycemia based on personal experience,rationalizing the prevalence of IAH,denying suffering from the negative impact of IAH,lack of psychological fluctuation experience caused by illness and emphasizing the dangers of hyperglycemia.Conclusion Most of type 2 diabetics with IAH following insulin therapy had negative responses to their illness,and their illness perceptions differed by coping strategies.In view of this,medical workers should provide professional and personalized health education and emotional support based on the patient's illness perceptions and coping strategies.

Key words: Diabetes mellitus, type 2;Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia;Insulin;Illness perception;Coping style;Common sense model;Mixed methods research