中国全科医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (35): 4377-4382.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.105

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于文献计量法分析健康相关生命质量量表在慢性肝炎领域中的应用

冉雪蓉1,张堂钦1,蔡一凡1,罗奎1,伍红艳1*,杨星1,张满2   

  1. 1.550004贵州省贵阳市,贵州医科大学医药卫生管理学院 2.550002贵州省贵阳市,贵州省人民医院
    *通信作者:伍红艳,教授,硕士研究生导师;E-mail:why376570155@126.com
  • 出版日期:2018-12-15 发布日期:2018-12-15
  • 基金资助:
    基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71463007);贵州省科技厅社会攻关项目(黔科合SY字[2013]3068);贵州省教育厅高校人文社会科学研究项目(2017ssd01)

Bibliometric Analysis of Health-related Quality of Life Assessment Instruments for Chronic Hepatitis Patients 

RAN Xuerong1,ZHANG Tangqin1,CAI Yifan1,LUO Kui1,WU Hongyan1*,YANG Xing1,ZHANG Man2   

  1. 1.School of Medicine and Health Management,Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang 550004,China
    2.Guizhou Provincial People 's Hospital,Guiyang 550002,China
    *Corresponding author:WU Hongyan,Professor,Master supervisor;E-mail:why376570155@126.com
  • Published:2018-12-15 Online:2018-12-15

摘要: 目的 分析慢性肝炎领域健康相关生命质量量表的应用现状,为我国研究者开展慢性肝炎患者生命质量评价,尤其是健康相关生命质量量表选择提供参考。方法 2017年3—9月,计算机检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网和中国生物医学文献数据库,查找慢性肝炎患者生命质量评价的相关文献,提取文献一般情况、研究内容、生命质量量表应用等内容。结果 共检索到233篇文献,其中期刊文献221篇,会议文献12篇。排除无法确定量表开发者的文献,应用国外开发的普适性量表、特异性量表和心理健康测量量表的频次分别为150(75.76%)、42(65.63%)、92(95.83%)次,国内开发的量表应用频次分别为37(18.67%)、10(15.63%)、0次。158篇(67.81%)文献单独选用普适性量表(124篇,78.48%)、特异性量表(17篇,10.76%)、心理健康测量量表(17篇,10.76%)中的一类,其中分别选择健康调查简表(SF-36)、慢性肝病问卷(CLDQ)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)+抑郁自评量表(SDS)的文献较多;71篇(30.47%)文献选择两类量表开展评价,应用较多的量表组合为SF-36/世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)+CLDQ、SF-36/WHOQOL-BREF/生活质量综合评定问卷(GQOLI-74)+SAS/SDS、CLDQ+SAS/SDS。仅4篇(1.72%)文献同时选择3类量表进行评价,为WHOQOL-BREF+CLDQ/社会功能缺陷筛选量表(SDSS)/服药依从性量表+SAS/SDS。结论 在慢性肝炎领域,目前国内大多数文献仍采用国外开发的量表,基于本国国情的量表尚需进一步的研发及推广,以为研究者在进行慢性肝炎患者生命质量评价时提供更广泛的选择。

关键词: 肝炎, 慢性;生活质量;量表;文献计量法

Abstract: Objective To analyze the application of health-related quality of life(HRQOL) instruments in chronic hepatitis patients,providing a reference for quality of life assessment including the choice of an appropriate instrument in such a population in China.Methods From March to September 2017,we searched the databases of CNKI,Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform,VIP and CBM,to identify the articles about HRQOL assessment.We analyzed the included articles by general information and contents of article,type of used HRQOL instrument and so on.Results A total of 233 articles were included,including 221 journal articles and 12 conference articles.Except those using instruments developed by the undetermined developer,among the remaining articles,the using times of general HRQOL instruments,chronic hepatitis-specific HRQOL instruments,and mental health assessment instruments developed in foreign countries were 150(75.76%),42(65.63%),92(95.83%),respectively,while those of the aforementioned 3 types of instruments developed in China were 37(18.67%),10(15.63%),0,respectively.158 articles(67.81%) used 1 type of HRQOL instrument〔including 124(78.48%),17(10.76%),17(10.76%) using the general HRQOL instrument and chronic hepatitis-specific HRQOL instrument,mental health assessment instrument,respectively〕,most of which used SF-36,CLDQ or SAS+SDS.Seventy-one(30.47%)used 2 types of HRQOL instruments,and most of which used SF-36/WHOQOL-BREF+CLDQ,SF-36/WHOQOL-BREF/GQOLI-74+SAS/SDS,or CLDQ+SAS/SDS.Four(1.72%) used 3 types of HRQOL instruments of WHOQOL-BREF+CLDQ/SDSS/medication adherence scale+SAS/SDS.Conclusion For assessing HRQOL of chronic hepatitis patients,most articles published in China use foreign instruments,and domestic instruments need to be further developed and used extensively by which more choice can be offered for such studies.

Key words: Hepatitis, chronic;Quality of life;Assessment instruments;Bibliometrics